PDA

View Full Version : A good week for Conservation



MOWGLI
04-03-2006, 11:20
From the Sunday NY Times. The article mentions a possible 400,000 acre deal between Nature Conservancy & Plum Creek near Moosehead Lake. I'd be curious to hear some insight from Weary on this.

Deals Turn Swaths of Timber Company Land Into Development-Free Areas
By FELICITY BARRINGER
BRITTONS NECK, S.C., March 28 — Timber companies and conservation organizations have been working to arrange and announce a cascade of deals transferring large, unbroken swaths of forestland into the hands of government, nonprofit — or even commercial — groups that are committed to keeping them free from development.

On Tuesday, the International Paper Company announced it would receive $300 million in a deal arranged by the Nature Conservancy and the Conservation Fund for 217,000 acres in 10 states around the Southeast.

The largest single tract, an unkempt 25,668-acre peninsula between the Pee Dee and Little Pee Dee Rivers in South Carolina, will ideally revert to the cypress and longleaf-pine forest that once covered these sandy flatlands. The company also said it had sold 69,000 acres of forestland in Wisconsin for $83 million to the Nature Conservancy.

The third and largest deal is intended to preserve up to 400,000 acres of land near Moosehead Lake in central Maine. Financial and other details are still being worked out between the Plum Creek Timber Company, the Nature Conservancy and two regional conservation groups.

But for all the good news, celebrated by all sides, a stubborn fact remains: The nearly one million acres that have been preserved in these deals over the past two years, including a 257,000-acre tract in the Adirondacks, represent barely 2 percent of timber company lands that are coming on the market in the East.

And in many places like parts of North and South Carolina, conservation groups are competing for the land with developers who seem more determined than ever.

"Based on market components," said David Liebetreu, International Paper's vice president for forest resources, "our forestlands are worth a lot more to other people than they are to us."

International Paper is not the only company making that calculation.

"The timber industry has taken nearly a century to assemble these large blocks of forestland," said Derb Carter, a lawyer with the Southern Environmental Law Center.

Craig Culp, who runs the Wilderness Society's eastern forest programs, said, "We're talking about forever altering the landscape."

The quick succession of sales, Mr. Carter said, provide a golden opportunity for conservation organizations — but the amount of state, federal and nonprofit money available is dwarfed by the amounts that can be offered by developers of residential communities, golf courses and hunting clubs. "The federal government is, for practical purposes, out of the conservation land acquisition business," Mr. Carter said.

An analysis of federal budget data by the Wilderness Society shows conservation financing — money available for conservation purchases either directly or through grants to states — has shrunk to about $140 million annually from more than $500 million in 2001.

At the moment, International Paper's land is the focus of attention. South Carolina, where two of its largest tracts going into conservation are located, expects to add 1 million residents to its population of 4.2 million in the next decade, said John E. Frampton, director of the state's Department of Natural Resources. There are 100 golf courses in the Myrtle Beach area, he added, and The Charleston Post recently reported that there were 134,000 building permits in Charleston County alone.

If the 39,000 acres in the two tracts — Woodbury in Brittons Neck and Hamilton Ridge on the other side of the state, near the Georgia border — were up for sale, Mr. Frampton predicted, it would be bought up instantly and subdivided into hunting clubs and hobby farms and eventually second-home communities.

The state had been trying to acquire those two tracts from their succession of timber company owners for more than a decade. When International Paper made clear last summer that it would sell all or part of its 6.5 million acres of forestland around the East, the conservation groups brokered a deal; this week, the $32 million bond issue that cements it was signed by Gov. Mark Sanford, a Republican. And here, as with the other tracts, International Paper is guaranteed a supply of timber for its nearby mills for at least five years.

The South Carolina bonds ensure that the state is the eventual heir to the Woodbury tract, where canebrakes and occasional skeletons of old cypress trees interrupt the not-so-neat rows of half-grown loblolly pines. Across the state, in one of South Carolina's fastest-growing regions, the 13,281-acre Hamilton Ridge tract, with its egret rookeries, will also be protected from development.

The tracts were chosen based on their ecological value, including the presence of endangered species, the stock of hardwoods and softwoods, and the proximity to other protected areas, said Mr. Liebetreu of International Paper; Steve McCormick, the Nature Conservancy's chairman; and Larry Selzer, who heads the Conservation Fund.

When the Nature Conservancy heard about the proposed sales by International Paper, "we laid out a long list of properties," totaling about a million acres, Mr. McCormick said. That wish list was pared down based on available financing and the company's preferences.

"It's a great example of private, public and nonprofit cooperation," said International Paper's chairman and chief executive, John Faraci.

The fact that the paper company retains the right to a supply of timber rankles a few environmentalists, but not Jamie Dozier, a biologist with the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Mr. Dozier grew up not far from the sandy second- and third-growth forest that thrives in the swampy areas between the Pee Dee River, which carries rich red soils from the Piedmont, and the blackish, acidic Little Pee Dee.

"They are the only folks who own very large pieces of land," Mr. Dozier said.

Referring to booming Myrtle Beach 40 miles away, Mr. Dozier said, "You'll have a 1,000-home subdivision pop up there in two weeks." While it will be a decade or more before that kind of development pressure arrives here in Marion County, he said, such deals are necessary to prepare for the future.

"You can't change concrete," Mr. Dozier said. "You can change a loblolly plantation."

Tha Wookie
04-03-2006, 11:32
Thanks for the good news!

The Solemates
04-03-2006, 11:49
And in many places like parts of North and South Carolina, conservation groups are competing for the land with developers who seem more determined than ever.

"Based on market components," said David Liebetreu, International Paper's vice president for forest resources, "our forestlands are worth a lot more to other people than they are to us."


this doesnt sound like good news to me.

weary
04-03-2006, 12:00
Plum Creek months ago proposed major development on about half the nearly million acres the company owns in Maine. The proposal included a thousand new house lots, RV campgrounds, and four season resorts in some of the wildest country in Maine.

That plan evoked a flury of opposition, in part because it promised no permanent protection for any of the acreage, and the company went back to the drawing boards.

A revised plan is supposed to be released in a few days. In the meantime the Nature Conservancy, Appalachian Mountain Club, and the Forest Society of Maine got together and agreed to a complex plan of gifts and purchases to permanently protect 400,000 acres of Plum Creek holdings.

I find the deal a bit worrisome, but overall positive. Afterall 400,000 acres is a lot of land, like half the size of the White Mountain National Forest.

The worry is that we still don't know the extent of Plum Creek's planned development. Which remote lakes and mountains will be cluttered with condos and resorts, which wildlife habitats changed forever.

But with the protection plan on the table, it will be more difficult for Maine regulators to reject the Plum Creek development, regardless with how bad a plan the company comes up with.

Weary

Tha Wookie
04-03-2006, 12:04
And in many places like parts of North and South Carolina, conservation groups are competing for the land with developers who seem more determined than ever.

"Based on market components," said David Liebetreu, International Paper's vice president for forest resources, "our forestlands are worth a lot more to other people than they are to us."


this doesnt sound like good news to me.

Is that part really news to you?

weary
04-03-2006, 12:07
And in many places like parts of North and South Carolina, conservation groups are competing for the land with developers who seem more determined than ever.
"Based on market components," said David Liebetreu, International Paper's vice president for forest resources, "our forestlands are worth a lot more to other people than they are to us."
this doesnt sound like good news to me.
This, of course, is why we founded the Maine Appalachian TRail Land TRust. We wanted to be in a position to buy those lands adjacent to the trail corridor as they came on the market. A lot of land has been purchased by Conservation groups in Maine over the past decade. Until we came along, no one had as their main goal additional buffers for the AT.


We have already succeeded in completing the protection of Abraham and the southeast slopes of Saddleback.

Those who wish to help can open www.matlt.org and make a donation. The need is great.

Weary

MOWGLI
04-03-2006, 12:31
Solemates:

No question. The information is a mixed bag, with the future implications being negative. However, it is not every week that nearly 1,000,000 acres of land is set aside and protected from development.

Now more than ever, it is important to assist Land Trusts like the Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust (http://www.matlt.org/). The landscape that our children and grandchildren hike, paddle and fish will in large part be shaped by the efforts of these great organizations.

I sent my first (small) check to the MATLT in December. I plan to send another one before too long. I hope others will too. In fact, maybe at some point Whiteblaze could do a fundraiser for MATLT. Maybe one of the Rucks could raise some much needed $$$.

The Solemates
04-03-2006, 13:27
Is that part really news to you?

no, just saddening

The Solemates
04-03-2006, 13:29
Solemates:

Maybe one of the Rucks could raise some much needed $$$.

this sounds like a great idea. i assume they will have a booth at trail days? weary?

Sly
04-03-2006, 14:54
Maybe one of the Rucks could raise some much needed $$$.

I can think of nothing better. One problem was/is having the group in a regional Ruck agree on a cause.

Since I'll be coordinator for the SoRuck again next year, I hope to come up with something, just not sure what.

It would ideal if Weary or someone else from MALT could make the trip.

the goat
04-03-2006, 15:13
sounds like excellent news to me, you've gotta figure there would be some sort of compromise b/t development & conservation....i'm glad that that much land was able to be secured! it seems that all too often conservation gets outbid by big developers & their investors.
i'm thrilled to see the success that MALT has had and pray that it continues in the future! (thank you weary for your efforts!)

TJ aka Teej
04-03-2006, 15:46
I find the deal a bit worrisome, but overall positive. Afterall 400,000 acres is a lot of land, like half the size of the White Mountain National Forest.

The worry is that we still don't know the extent of Plum Creek's planned development. Which remote lakes and mountains will be cluttered with condos and resorts, which wildlife habitats changed forever.


I'll hold back my "overall positive" until we learn what lands (if any) are to be set aside for preservation, what lands are to be developed to what extent, and exactly what Plum Creek means when they say "preserved." It is quite probable that they mean "preserved for traditional uses" which means they'll continue logging the land they don't build on.

weary
04-03-2006, 16:11
I'll hold back my "overall positive" until we learn what lands (if any) are to be set aside for preservation, what lands are to be developed to what extent, and exactly what Plum Creek means when they say "preserved." It is quite probable that they mean "preserved for traditional uses" which means they'll continue logging the land they don't build on.
It will be a mix of uses. Some lands (about 100,000 acres, I understand) will be totally protected as ecological preserves. Some will continue to be harvested. Maine still does have a lumber and paper industry. Let he who uses no wood or paper cast the first stone. Once land is in public or conservation ownership we have the balance of civilization to figure out how best to manage it. Trees will grow back. Condos and golf courses remain forever a blight on the wildness that once was northern Maine.

Weary

Cookerhiker
04-03-2006, 17:45
Well, most of this news causes some hope. But wouldn't it be nice if we had some real leadership in the White House and the upper echelons of Congress and our Statehouses, someone appreciative of and dedicated to the basic concept of conservation? Someone pro-active, not just having a good voting record.

Last week, I was approached by an eager young volunteer advocating for a Democratic state senate candidate in the primary (where I live is about 70% Democratic). The one-page flyer listed all these desirable, do-good, liberal causes - education, housing affordability, living wages, integrity from special interests, affordable health care, you name it. Absent from this literature was any reference to the Chesapeake Bay (the signature environmental issue in Maryland) let alone suburban sprawl, poor air quality, degradation of water. global climate change. Sure, this candidate may vote "right" on these issues. But where's the passion, what's the priority? I gently told this campaign worker that I'd vote for the candiate who made environmental issues a priority - not just a back-burner matter to address when "someone else" brought it to the forefront; I want my representative to bring them to the forefront.

Yeah, there are some political heroes out there but we need more of them in higher places.

walkin' wally
04-03-2006, 18:34
There is a nice strip of proposed conservation land of several thousand acres running from somewhere near Whitecap Mountain ,abutting the AT corridor, I think, north to the Nahmakanta unit. Hopefully that will include some of the small ponds like Penobscot Pond and some the Roach Ponds etc. It also abuts the AMC land.

As a landowner at Moosehead I do like this plan better than the original but it remains to be seen what the scope of development will be. I am amazed that they wanted to put another golf course in the area when the two that are there now are not used a great deal.

TJ aka Teej
04-04-2006, 18:48
created a new thread with today's NRCM statement:
http://www.whiteblaze.net/forum/showthread.php?t=14152