PDA

View Full Version : Integral Designs eEVENT rain jacket, first impression



chris
05-18-2005, 19:28
Yeah, I know $187 (on sale) is too much to pay for a jacket for the AT, but I'm going to be spending some time this summer in the Rockies and I want/need to have good weather protection and the ability to hike in my rain gear. The potential for cold rain is just too high to hike without solid gear. I got my eVENT jacket yesterday and spent a little time playing around with it. As far as I know, there hasn't been a thruhiker type test of the ID jacket, just things on BPL (which you have to pay to see). I'm going to put the jacket through a thrashing this summer and will write up a full report when I get back in late September. The following are some initial impressions.

Weight, for a size large, is 8.7 oz according to my scale. This is less than claimed, but I suspect that the claimed weight includes the small, zippered silnylon pouch that it came with. While not, quite, as light as Frogg Toggs, it is very close.

There is one pocket, and this is located on the chest and is accessible while wearing the pack. The pocket looks large enough to put a camera in and perhaps some food or other things you don't want getting wet in a downpour.

The material feels like GoreTex XCR, but thinner. So, not soft like Frogg Toggs, but overall just fine.

The hood appears to be functional, although a brim would have been a nice touch. The hood is shockcorded and you cannot adjust the tension of the shock cord. Forget about wearing a helmet underneath the hood. The hood seals nicely around my face, although I suspect that wind driven rain will present a problem. Still, the hood is far superior to those found on Frogg Toggs or O2 jackets/anoraks. It isn't as nice as the hood on my MEC Aquanator III jacket. I'm carrying a brimmed hat anyways for sun protection.

The jacket is definitely cut on the trim side, which is how I like it. There is enough room underneath for a thin shirt and a thermal top, but not much more. If you are expecting to use this jacket in conditions in which a fleece underneath would be good, I'd get a size larger than you need.

Cuffs are velcro closures, which is a nice change from the shock-corded cuffs on Frogg Toggs.

The bottom of the jacket is tightened or loosened by means of twin shock cords with barrel locks . Unfortunately, the locks are right at the zipper, which makes zipping up the jacket a little awkward. This might not be an issue, though.

The zipper is one of the Urtek(?) waterproof deals.

You can get the jacket in yellow or dark green. I got the dark green for more of a stealth effect, especially as I might have to do some night stealth hiking across priaate property.

tlbj6142
05-18-2005, 22:13
I've read its quite short. You're long in the torso does it ride quite a bit when you raise your arms? Does it cover the top third of your waist/butt? Regarding the hood, I though it was designed to be placed over a helmet. Isn't it primarily designed for climbers (one reason why I believe it is a bit short)?

I think someone else has a nice multi-page write-up. The link, I think, is in a message on this board posted shortly after they arrived on the market.

The bpl review doesn't say much more than what you have written except Ryan claims he can wear a base layer and a lofty thermal layer underneath his with "binding in the shoulders or chest."

chris
05-19-2005, 10:53
The length is right at the waist, so you get no butt coverage. Moving my arms about kept the jacket where it should be, but I didn't try doing pull ups with it on. It is about the same length as the Frogg Toggs anorak, I suppose, but shorter than other rain jackets I've used. The MEC Aquanator covers about half my arse.

The shockcorded hood could, I suppose, be worn under a helmet, but definitely not over: There just isn't enough volume.

tlbj6142
05-19-2005, 17:33
The shockcorded hood could, I suppose, be worn under a helmet, but definitely not over: There just isn't enough volume.After re-reading the bpl review, they don't mention helmet support. Must have been mistaken.

papa john
06-14-2005, 08:53
Actually, I am a transcriber for 2 thru-hikers that started out with the event jackets. Both of the jackets failed at some point before entering the Shenandoahs. You can read about it here: http://www.trailjournals.com/entry.cfm?trailname=2738 Go to the last entry and read back. They are trying to get in touch with the manufacturer.

HikeLite
06-14-2005, 11:06
Actually, I am a transcriber for 2 thru-hikers that started out with the event jackets. Both of the jackets failed at some point before entering the Shenandoahs. You can read about it here: http://www.trailjournals.com/entry.cfm?trailname=2738 Go to the last entry and read back. They are trying to get in touch with the manufacturer.

papa john, The repairman sprayed raid all over their event jackets....im betting that will cause them to fail.

papa john
06-14-2005, 23:04
The repairman?

HikeLite
06-15-2005, 01:50
http://www.trailjournals.com/entry.cfm?autonumber=91492&keyword=event

Read where a repair man sprayed their rain gear with chemicals. The next entry talking about the rain gear speaks of their failure to be waterproof. Problem solved.

fiddlehead
06-15-2005, 03:12
Seems to me theres only one way to know if raingear does what they claim it does and that's to go hiking in the rain with it. A downpour on a steep climb is the best test. As far as my experience goes, Frogg Toggs kept me the driest and i've tried many including a $379 Northface jacket, and Patagonia's noH2O or something like that. The frogg Toggs breathe better than anything i've tried also

papa john
06-15-2005, 08:18
I've typed every word in this journal so far (at least since they have been on the trail) and I sure don't remember that entry! But you're probably right. No telling what chemicals were in that spray!