The initial fluff was very bad. When I stuff down I still do it the old fashioned way by weighing then making a "snowball" to stuff. Many people will tell you what a nightmare regular down is and how it ends up everywhere if you aren't careful. It's true more or less.
As a contrast- the treated stuff was very easy to work with in that regard and I hardly lost a cluster. It sticks to itself and doesn't float around the room unless you are very sloppy with it, and even then it doesn't go far.
When I'm all done and the bags are stitched up; Apples to Apples with 850 fill and similar bag construction-
The regular stuff took four or five good shakes and it was done. Snowballs busted and chambers filled.
The treated stuff took some hand busting, and several runs in the dryer with tennis balls to bust the clumps.
Overall- Performance seemed to be about 50FP lower when it was all said and done. Getting max loft again after stuffing the bag proved more work with the treated stuff.
That said- we're only talking a few bags on my end.
But I do note that Western Mountaineering still hasn't bought in, and Zpacks recent change back to regular is interesting as well. I also question a bit of the marketing. Wetting out down, despite general advice is a bit tricky in real life conditions and there are decades of proven use of regular down by careful and experienced users that back up using untreated down. I think a good shell does as much if not more for your money IMO.
It is basically free relative to the cost of the bag to use treated, and if you are selecting your bag 10-20 degrees beyond expected temps and going with a general "better safe than sorry approach" then the difference is probably minimal. If you are trying to push the limits a bit and get every gram of warmth out... then it's a decent point to ponder.