WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default Legal (yes, legal) camping on Max Patch

    Click here for the reply to the email I sent below:


    image.jpg

    Date: May 12, 2015 at 7:25:58 AM EDT
    To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Subject: Camping on Max Patch
    Good Morning.

    Could you please confirm whether or not dispersed camping is prohibited on the Max Patch Bald as I believe is the case.

    If you have a PDF copy of the Supervisor/Regional Forester order detailing these camping restrictions (assuming they exist), might you be able to forward me a copy?

    Thank you in advance for your efforts on this request.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-04-2011
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Age
    57
    Posts
    566

    Default

    What would have made you think that it was prohibited?

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-19-2005
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    3,715
    Images
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Bumpy View Post
    What would have made you think that it was prohibited?



    because this website---

    http://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/nfsnc...48620&actid=64


    used to say it was not allowed............


    (they musta changed the wording on the website as it used to say it was illegal to camp on the bald-----still shows up in a google search but not on the page)

  4. #4
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default

    The way I worded my inquiry not withstanding, I never really thought it was.

    There was a long thread on Whiteblaze stating that camping on Max was prohibited, simply because of something that was posted on a FS website.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-19-2005
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    3,715
    Images
    3

    Default

    it was posted on the FS website...

    after reading the other thread, i googled it and saw it on the FS website..

    however, now it doesnt say anything about camping up there...

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-29-2008
    Location
    West Palm Beach, Florida
    Age
    69
    Posts
    3,605

    Default

    Oh great...now a bunch of damn campers are gonna get in the way of hiker feeds on Max Patch.

    The trouble I have with campfires are the folks that carry a bottle in one hand and a Bible in the other.
    You never know which one is talking.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-04-2011
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Age
    57
    Posts
    566

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TNhiker View Post
    because this website---

    http://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/nfsnc...48620&actid=64


    used to say it was not allowed............


    (they musta changed the wording on the website as it used to say it was illegal to camp on the bald-----still shows up in a google search but not on the page)
    OK. Never knew it. Its forest service so pretty much anything goes, mostly. I've been hiking around here for 20 years and never have seen it posted at the bald. The old prohibition must not have been enforced much because there are not stories floating around about getting kicked off or fined or such, at least not in Asheville circles.

  8. #8
    Registered User Walkintom's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-16-2010
    Location
    Eagle River, WI
    Age
    52
    Posts
    697

    Default

    I'm pleasantly surprised to see that they corrected the website to improve clarity on this. And fairly quickly, too.

  9. #9

    Default

    Maybe they took it down when they realized they couldn't control the off road vehicles so why start in on the campers?

  10. #10
    Hometown GA-ME 2008 baxter's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-28-2007
    Location
    Franklin, NC
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rickb View Post
    Click here for the reply to the email I sent below:


    image.jpg
    Date: May 12, 2015 at 7:25:58 AM EDT
    To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
    Subject: Camping on Max Patch
    Good Morning.

    Could you please confirm whether or not dispersed camping is prohibited on the Max Patch Bald as I believe is the case.

    If you have a PDF copy of the Supervisor/Regional Forester order detailing these camping restrictions (assuming they exist), might you be able to forward me a copy?

    Thank you in advance for your efforts on this request.
    Just curious, I wonder if "Office Automation Assistant" is government-speak for "robot"?
    ..guess I'll keep a livin' till the day I die...

    www.trailjournals.com/chuck2008

  11. #11

    Default

    Interesting...when I hiked in 2002 the word on the street was that camping on the bald was prohibited, but I had never seen it written anywhere...I just assumed that the conventional wisdom was true. Might be an example of something repeated often enough and loud enough...

  12. #12
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronk View Post
    Interesting...when I hiked in 2002 the word on the street was that camping on the bald was prohibited, but I had never seen it written anywhere...I just assumed that the conventional wisdom was true. Might be an example of something repeated often enough and loud enough...
    I think that may be the case. This happens in my stomping grounds (the Whites) and was my primary motivation for asking to see the Supervisor's order detailing the prohibition.

    I am sure the people who added the prohibition on the FS website were well meaning -- just as I am sure the AMC and FS sign makers are well meaning when they make mistakes. The problem is not so much getting the rules wrong from time to time, as it is having two different sets of rules out in front of the public.

    I give great credit to the Forest Service for not only answering my specific question regarding the absence of a supervisor's order prohibiting camping on Max Patch, but also correcting their website.
    Last edited by rickb; 05-19-2015 at 10:40.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •