WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30
  1. #1

    Default Ultralight principles to (airplane) carry-on luggage?

    I'm just wondering if anybody is as insane as me to to apply their ultralight hiking principles to their carry-on luggage when they're flying on a plane?

    I'm planning a trip to a couple countries in Europe next summer and wanted to see if I could fit everything I need into a carry-on size bag (which for domestic flights in Europe is a very small 21x13x8", albeit 22 pounds). This is a city to city type trip (i.e. no camping). Getting a LOT more luggage over there from the U.S. is easy size and weight wise (with many airlines still not charging extra for checked luggage), but those smaller country-to-country flights inside Europe are where it can cost 50 Euros (about $55) to check a single bag (and most flights are like $30...), and is why I wanted to try this out (plus I already had most of the stuff I needed so why not?)

    With the appropriate size bag (I picked up an Osprey Porter 30-liter bag for cheap), I found it's a tight fit but completely doable. Used the same hiking clothes I always wear (which are light, compact, and stain/smell resistant: 3x shirts, 1x pants, 1x shorts, 2x socks and underwear, some backup sandals, froggtoggs and jacket; along with a quick dry towel and Coccon travelsheet for the hostels). Even used some of my larger bottles to repackage toiletries in. Computer, Kindle, 1-pound camera and all accessories, travel books (~2 pounds right there), USB battery pack, plug converters, sunglasses, water bottle, first aid kit - all picked out with ultralight in mind. Everything is coming out to 17 pounds!

    ...just wondering if anyone has done similar.

  2. #2
    Hiker bigcranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2002
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Age
    61
    Posts
    7,937
    Images
    296

    Default

    Yup, every time. My carryon pack is not much smaller than my hiking pack, and I don't need to worry about tent, bag, cook kit, etc., so I have plenty of room for everything I need for an indefinite trip. My carryon is smaller than the max so I never have to worry about checking it even on smaller regional jets.

    I wear travel pants and a light wool short sleeve top, wool socks, wool boxer briefs, hiking shoes, and a lightweight jacket. I pack a single change of clothing, just like when hiking -- long sleeve wool shirt, second pair of travel pants, spare socks and underwear. Something to sleep in on a train, toiletries, and personal items. We're headed to Ukraine in January for 11 days and the only thing I will add is warm clothing which I will wear (fleece, down parka, hat, gloves). My small camera bag fits inside my carryon so I have only one bag which easily fits under any airline seat, even in the smallest planes -- no anxiety about overhead space because I don't need it.

    Like in ultralight hiking, once you get past all the things you think you "need" for travel (like a change of clothes for every day, and multiple pairs of shoes), and get into the mindset of "everything fits in this little tiny bag", travel gets a lot easier. I can wash out my base layers in my room and hang them to dry. I can buy extra toilet articles at my destination. I don't need a giant camera bag, just a single camera and lens. (I like the Fuji X100 series.)

    I even do this when I travel for work, which is pretty often, though mostly for a single overnight. I put my suit, shirt, socks, and shoes in my carryon, and pack my camera kit (which is why I am going) into a shoulder bag. Fly to the destination, go to the hotel, put on the suit, go shoot the event, the next day I can put on my previous day's travel clothes and get back on the plane. All carryon, all small bags, no worries at the airport.

    Now if I can just apply the ultralight principles to my house and all my crap. Working on it.
    Ken B
    'Big Cranky'
    Our Long Trail journal

  3. #3

    Default

    There is probably more websites and blogs dedicated to this style of travel than to ul backpacking.

    Check out onebag.com

    Sent from my SM-T110 using Tapatalk
    Love people and use things; never the reverse.

    Mt. Katahdin would be a lot quicker to climb if its darn access trail didn't start all the way down in Georgia.

  4. #4

    Default

    Not insane, but when done well, smart. As said, many a savvy in the know travelers have learned to pack light which is that communities way of applying UL philosophy. Many benefits to traveling UL and LIVING LIGHT. Huge proponent of LIVING LIGHT. For some of us UL does not begin and end at the TH.

  5. #5
    Garlic
    Join Date
    10-15-2008
    Location
    Golden CO
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,615
    Images
    2

    Default

    One of the more helpful tenets of UL packing is to be able to wear all the clothes you pack at the same time as part of a coordinated layering system. Applying that to airline travel greatly reduces the pack volume.

  6. #6
    Registered User colorado_rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-20-2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    67
    Posts
    4,540
    Images
    3

    Default

    My wife and I are doing a 3-week UK trip next May, including 100 miles of hiking (west highland way) and we will both have only carryon luggage. this is the only way to travel in Europe, UL that is, IMHO, makes it so much easier to get around on trains, buses, subways, etc. I did 6 weeks in France this way. We basically will both have 40 liter backpacks with all of our gear and "civilian" clothes, wearing our hiking boots on the plane.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-17-2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    64
    Posts
    5,126

    Default

    I try to do the same too. Getting my wife to go UL, however - easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle... She has had her carry on rejected for being overweight a couple of times now. I think she finally got the message when I showed her that about half of her carry on weight allowance was taken up by her carry on bag when empty! She finally agreed that it would make sense to buy a smaller bag (since it is too heavy when full anyway) and a lighter bag (so she can cut less stuff). Not really UL, but we are using UL principles. Too bad the checked luggage limit is 50 lbs. Fortunately her checked bag is still a carry on size - just heavier. Even though we (well she) over packs, it is easy to ID our bags when they come out on the luggage carousel - they are the ones that look tiny compared to the monster bags everyone travels with.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    07-21-2014
    Location
    Bar Harbor, Maine
    Posts
    620

    Default

    I have been doing this for 3 or 4 years now. It makes traveling way more fun even if there is no hiking on the trip. Sink washable and quick dry clothes are essential. I usually wear street shoes and carry trail runners fir gym workouts or hikes. I also indulge in one pair of jeans plus nylon hiking pants. Carrying hiking type food is a must for me. Chocolate, nuts, jerky, bars, cheese, crackers, even granola and dried milk for hotels.

    I like Bigcranky,'s idea of going ultralight on all of the crap at home. Perhaps it can make preparing and launching trips smoother and more enjoyable.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9

    Default

    Of course there are extremists rtwblog.com

    Sent from my SM-T110 using Tapatalk
    Love people and use things; never the reverse.

    Mt. Katahdin would be a lot quicker to climb if its darn access trail didn't start all the way down in Georgia.

  10. #10
    Registered User Tuckahoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-26-2004
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,320
    Images
    52

    Default

    Nice thread. Planning my own trip to Dublin and England as well. Looking at the Porter 30 and keeping it light weight as well.
    igne et ferrum est potentas
    "In the beginning, all America was Virginia." -​William Byrd

  11. #11
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default

    My wife and have done only one "group" trip abroad-- something like 10 days.

    When we all got together at the airport, the leader singled my wife and I out for wisdom traveling with only a couple small carry ons, as he and the others waited to check thier luggage.

    His is complements were a bit over the top-- even took a picture. Not sure if he was sincere, but while I didn't feel like we were traveling especially light it was kind of crazy how much stuff some people were lugging.

    The best part was on the reaction we got second day in when we joined the group in our wet suits and fins. I think the fact that we had them was beyond on woman's comprehension.

    Some people need a clean pair of underwear and new shirt every day, and others can find a sink and soap and water...

  12. #12

    Default

    I bring a small bottle of woolite for sink washing merino. Nylon and other synthetic items are even easier as shampoo will do in a pinch and they'll dry faster.

    Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckahoe View Post
    Looking at the Porter 30 and keeping it light weight as well.
    I've been playing with the Porter 30 for a few days now and overall I like it. The only thing I don't like is the size - which it's constrained to because of the required carry-on sizes. This means it'll never fit my large torso properly. But with around 17 pounds in it, it'll be fine for an ~hour walk from the airport or train station to the hotel (any longer and it would get uncomfortable).

    I also found I don't need any of the 20 little storage compartments on the large outside pocket. The large laptop pocket is fine for my MacBook Air 11", but the others are just wasted space since all my smaller items are in two small travel storage cubes. You might be able to find a bag more simple and cheaper if you likewise don't need all those pockets

  14. #14
    Registered User Siestita's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-06-2007
    Location
    Frankfort, KY
    Age
    74
    Posts
    371
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    Kudos to you ultra lite folks who manage to travel internationally comfortably with just 30 liter packs. For folks like me who sometimes want to take a bit more while staying "carry on" most of the time, there is the Porter 46. It's 45 linear inch dimensions comply exactly with the major airlines' carry on size rules. Porter 30 is smaller, reportedly totaling 41 linear inches.

    During the past five years my Porter 46 has served me well for three trips to Mexico, of three weeks each, for a family vacation, and for travel to a professional conference or two. On two of those occasions I had to gate check my Porter 46, when planes literally had no overhead space available to store bags of any size.

    For me, there are times when being able to travel with 46 liters of stuff, rather than just 30 liters, can be helpful. I did a little trekking between mountain towns during one December Mexico trip, so I carried in the Porter 46, in addition to warm clothes and "town stuff", a summer weight down sleeping bag and a Neoair. Having that bag and pad along made it possible for me to accept an invitation to sleep for two nights on the floor of the municipal building of a small village that was celebrating its patron saint's fiesta.

    No, the Porter 46 is not as comfortable for me to haul for long distances as carrying my old Colin Fletcher style Trailwise external frame pack would be. And, for my aging back, 18 pounds is my personal comfort limit for the Porter 46. But Osprey deserves, I think, credit for applying know-how garnered from their development of wilderness backpacks to design of that Porter line of travel packs/duffels. I like the fact that there are pack straps and a hip belt, and I appreciate having the option of stowing those conveniently inside the pack.

    Here is a Thorntree thread about good travel packs, some of which are slightly larger than the Porter 30:

    https://www.lonelyplanet.com/thorntr...#post_18194925


    And, here are links to photos of mine of from Mexican village fiesta (and nearby hiking areas), and to a video of the fiesta made three years earlier by someone else:

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/chris0...57629877854091

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/chris0...57629140751240

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhVrD1QZDeo

  15. #15
    Super Moderator Marta's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-30-2005
    Location
    NW MT
    Posts
    5,468
    Images
    56

    Default

    This brings back memories...

    When I was 14 I went to Germany for the summer on a chartered flight full of high school students. No weight limit on baggage. My mother masterminded my wardrobe and the packing. The suitcase weighed 76 pounds at the Boston airport. The handle broke as I was wrestling the bag onto the train in Frankfurt. Can we say miserable experience?

    The next summer I went with my grandparents for a month in the "old country," Portugal. I brought two reversible wrap-around skirts and three or four polyester crepe blouses (all of which I made myself) which could be washed in the hotel bathroom sink, a bathing suit, and some easy wash & dry underwear. Baggage weight at Logan Airport: 21 pounds.

    As has been noted above, there are websites--and travel clothing companies--devoted to light and easy travel. Allison Tilley (of the Tilley Hat family) wrote a little pamphlet on lightweight travel. For a woman, a basic black dress (crush-proof fabric) with a couple sets of costume jewelry will cover most situations in a stylish manner. A three-piece coordinated (all black works for me) outfit of top, slacks, and skirt, can be even more versatile. Unless you are part of a sports team, or going on a backcountry expedition, it's probably best to dress up rather than down, especially if you're heading someplace where clothing really matters--the UK, as a symbol of class, or Italy, just because.

    Every time I board a flight (which has been frequently this year due to illness and death in the family), I goggle at my fellow travelers with their mountains of baggage, checked and especially carry-on. The amount of energy it takes to deal with all that stuff...I marvel at their willingness to do it.

    I will probably never reach the simplicity of travel I have seen in some other people--who traveled in the clothes they were standing up in plus, maybe, a toothbrush in the shirt pocket. (There was a guy going by train from Siberia to Moscow. His "luggage" was a small paper bag, the principle contents of which were a bottle of champagne.) It's quick and easy, but one does end up smelling like a thru-hiker, so I don't want to go there when I'm not thru-hiking.

    Best wishes for a great trip!
    If not NOW, then WHEN?

    ME>GA 2006
    http://www.trailjournals.com/entry.cfm?trailname=3277

    Instagram hiking photos: five.leafed.clover

  16. #16
    Registered User colorado_rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-20-2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    67
    Posts
    4,540
    Images
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siestita View Post
    Kudos to you ultra lite folks who manage to travel internationally comfortably with just 30 liter packs. For folks like me who sometimes want to take a bit more while staying "carry on" most of the time, there is the Porter 46. It's 45 linear inch dimensions comply exactly with the major airlines' carry on size rules. Porter 30 is smaller, reportedly totaling 41 linear inches.
    Good tip. Awesome pack, we were lusting for it at an REI recently, so we're actually buying a pair of them, the 46's, next spring (using our REI coupons and dividends...) just before our next trip (Scotland).

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-04-2013
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    4,316

    Default

    I used a ULA CDT in Europe this past summer for hut to hut style hiking and exploring a couple of cities. I'll probably never go back to lugging large suitcases. One downside: like in certain parts of the US, it seems like "backpackers" are not treated as well as conventional tourists especially in fancy places. But that's a minor downside.

  18. #18
    Hiker bigcranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2002
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Age
    61
    Posts
    7,937
    Images
    296

    Default

    We have the Tom Bihn Tri-Star bags. They are about 32 liters. Some advantages: they are smaller than max carryon, so they fit under the seat on any airplane. I've never been asked to gate check it, nor do I worry about needing overhead bin space on a crowded flight. The Tri-Star has built in backpack straps, which are comfortable up to the max carryon weight of 8kg, but which zip away and the bag suddenly looks like a nice piece of high end luggage -- so when I arrive at the hotel, I'm not a "backpacker".

    One advantage that doesn't get noted very often is the ability have all your stuff with you all the time. With a noon checkout and a 7pm train, there is no need to find a place to stash the bag, same with staying in a sketchy place.

    The main downside to the Tom Bihn stuff is the price, but it's handmade in Oregon.
    Ken B
    'Big Cranky'
    Our Long Trail journal

  19. #19

    Default

    Here's Matt's Gear. http://expertvagabond.com/travel/

    IMHO, an even moderately advanced UL LD hiker can find ways to cut some of the bulk and wt from his typical traveling kits. Good place to start though when considering UL travel. .

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Siestita View Post
    Kudos to you ultra lite folks who manage to travel internationally comfortably with just 30 liter packs. For folks like me who sometimes want to take a bit more while staying "carry on" most of the time, there is the Porter 46. It's 45 linear inch dimensions comply exactly with the major airlines' carry on size rules.

    I would love to have more room! But the problem is when I looked at the 20ish budget airlines across Europe (think companies like RyanAir and EasyJet), the ideal size seems to be 21" tall x 13" wide x 7.87" deep to qualify for carry-on (they don’t do linear inches). Sadly, the Porter 46 is over that size in every dimension.


    They even love to make you shove your bag into these metal pre-sized cubes to make sure it's EXACTLY under their spec, or they charge you the ~$50+ luggage fee! Pretty harsh…

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •