You are a New Jersey resident so give it try what do you have to lose? The worst thing that can happen is they say "Sorry, too busy to talk". They probably can direct you to some report on the web that will tell you what you want to know. Collecting data is what they do.
If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.
It speaks volumes that tdoczi would rather anonymously bicker with otherwise uninvolved strangers on the internet than contact anyone who is directly involved in studying and managing bears in that region, and why you folks continue to entertain this person is beyond me.
Hmmm...... wonder how much bear habitat has been compromised by the production of the electricity I have waisted reading and responding to this thread? Wonder if others reading this have thought about that?
Hmmm...... wonder how much bear habitat has been compromised by the production of the electricity I have waisted reading and responding to this thread? Wonder if others reading this have thought about that?
I am currently guilty. I am in need of reform. Change is in the wind Can you steer me in the direction of a 12 Step Program?
Oops, slipped again.
Unfortunately, though we can get a pretty fair idea of the number of bears taken by hunting along with car wrecks and problem bear kills, the total population is an estimate. It may be a fairly accurate estimate, but its not a hard number. There are, however increasing bear/human interactions that are reported through the past 5 years or so, another indication bears are increasing in number.
My point was, hunting alone will not provide bear population control unless the season is expanded by a week or three, but even then its questionable. Other contributing factors to the bear population increases could be bears from surrounding states being trapped and released, or just pushed out of their range by other bears. Its a regional issue to be sure.
decent population estimates for more years than 2010 would be an improvement.
the increasing bear human interactions (are there numbers that support this? i mean there have been a lot of "incidents" even before the hunt began in 2010. this might be an "increase" in the same way we all think violent crime is on the rise even though the opposite is true) can just as easily by a sign of further human encroachment than of increased bear population. perhaps a more accurate interpretation of the statement you quote is "despite the hunt being held for the past 5 years, nuisance bears continue to be an issue"
The NJ DEP started the current Bear rating system in 2000, so there is another 10 years of data if you want to dig around the archive of PDF files. I have inserted a link to the NJDEP Comprehensive Black Bear Management Policy. Though it doesn't have a lot of what you are looking for, it does have "Literature Citations" of materials used in development and execution of the Policy. Most of these are PDF files that can be referenced. Not sure it will help or not, theres a LOT of stuff there. Mull some cider!
http://www.njfishandwildlife.com/bearpolicy15.htm
humans kill 3/4 million babies here in the US a year. what's 400 bears or so?
just tryin' to bring a little perspective into view. the thread has drifted so much, as always. time to close it out.