WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 31
  1. #1
    Registered User skinnbones's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-11-2014
    Location
    Largo, FL
    Age
    60
    Posts
    208

    Default Max Total Weight

    In preparation for a 2017 Thru hike. I'm very thin (140 lbs... that is where Skinnbones comes from) and wondering what my max total weight should be for my pack. I understand Ultra is the way to go, but my budget won't allow this. Also, have you seen many "under weight" hikers on the A.T.? Thanks.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    20% of your lean (all of it I gather) body mass would be 28 lbs. That should be easy to do on a reasonable budget. The cheap route is to carry fewer items, not marginally lighter ones. I hope to meet you next spring.
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  3. #3

    Default

    being underweight is in many ways better for hiking than packing a bunch of extra pounds in fat, so you have that going for you. there are many very light hikers that have no issue, and you'll be fine

    You just have to make sure you bring enough food or you'll get very weak if you have no extra fat

    make sure your big items are as light as you can manage and get a fairly light pack and you'll be fine. You can look for a used shelter, and don't need a 950 fill down sleeping bag. Just start with the mindset that you won't bring any stuff that isn't really needed

  4. #4
    Bluebird
    Join Date
    12-29-2014
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Age
    78
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Wise advice above. I highly recommend Mike Clelland's Ultralight Backpackin' Tips. Subtitled 153 amazing and inexpensive tips for extremely lightweight camping. Also at the top of the front cover: a practical & philosophical guide (with cartoons). The wise advice above still stands as you go through the book. Even though I have decided NOT to go ultralight, the author's approach was excellent. Every decision I have made for my hike later this year has its roots in the philosophy/approach that the author offers. I have been able to use a lot of what I already had, and saw how the author figured out which stuff should go into the pack.

    Also, you are in an excellent position to snap up some deals on used equipment, found elsewhere in this forum. You have almost a year to cruise for deals. I bought secondhand tent, backpack, rain pants, and maps from fellow hikers using this site. I asked for and got some Tyvek at a construction site. I did buy a cookset new. And I made my own alcohol stove. Not bragging; just giving you an assurance that you too can do it.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-18-2016
    Location
    Wabash, IN
    Posts
    744
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default

    I'm in the process of bringing my gear weight down. You've got time to scrounge for some of the lighter gear you'll need, and as everyone will tell you, get the weight down on your sleeping bag, shelter, pack, and cooking equipment. Your food and water are going to weigh what they weigh, and it'll vary. I just dropped five pounds on my gear weight today by getting a much lighter pack and a summer weight sleeping bag. That was a huge drop for me, and I should be in the high 20s to low 30s. I'm also carrying a hammock instead of a tent, and depending on the brands, you can drop a significant amount of weight by switching to a hammock.




  6. #6
    Registered User lonehiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-18-2005
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,440

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenlight View Post
    I'm also carrying a hammock instead of a tent, and depending on the brands, you can drop a significant amount of weight by switching to a hammock.
    I don't think this is a true statement.
    Lonehiker (MRT '22)

  7. #7
    Registered User lonehiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-18-2005
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,440

    Default

    What hammock setup is lighter than the lightest tent?
    Lonehiker (MRT '22)

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-06-2005
    Location
    Auburn Maine
    Age
    72
    Posts
    2

    Default Max Total Weight

    Dutchware halfwit hammock - 13 ounces including suspension, and cuben fiber tarp at 10 ounces, not many tents are lighter than that

  9. #9

    Default

    yeah, you can make a basic tent that weighs little out of cuban fiber tarp + a couple other components too.

    But I don't think the OP wants to buy any cuban fiber goods...

    So just getting a fairly minimal shelter will work if you plan on mostly using shelters. If you want to use your tent/hammock more often then it's worth investing more

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-01-2014
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Age
    62
    Posts
    2,500

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waukinslo View Post
    Dutchware halfwit hammock - 13 ounces including suspension, and cuben fiber tarp at 10 ounces, not many tents are lighter than that
    Yeah, but your tarping, not tenting, and lots of tarps are lighter than 23 oz. If you ditch the hammock, use a polycryo ground sheet and you are at 10 oz for the tarp and 2 oz for the ground sheet and save 11 oz by sleeping on the ground. That doesn't mean hammocking is a bad thing or that it isn't worth carrying the extra weight, but DON'T GO FOOLING YOURSELF thinking that a hammock is lighter than going to ground.

    If you are trying to be economical, you can get tarps for a lot less money and a lot less weight than any other adequate shelter. It's amazing how much weight can be saved with a little knowledge.

    Spend money on a good bag/quilt and a good pack. Everything else can be done perfectly functionally in total dirt-bag cheap mode.
    I'm not lost. I'm exploring.

  11. #11
    Registered User lonehiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-18-2005
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,440

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waukinslo View Post
    Dutchware halfwit hammock - 13 ounces including suspension, and cuben fiber tarp at 10 ounces, not many tents are lighter than that
    There are several tents lighter than 23 oz.
    Lonehiker (MRT '22)

  12. #12
    Registered User 4eyedbuzzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-02-2007
    Location
    DFW, TX / Northern NH
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,143
    Images
    27

    Default

    Just don't fall into the trap of having an absolute "set" weight limit and not having gear suitable for conditions. Gear carried is determined by the conditions you'll be hiking in, not just by an arbitrary weight goal. Warm and dry and well fed are more important than carrying a few extra pounds. You'll also obviously carry more weight on both ends of a hike as that's when you'll need more insulation for sleeping, for clothing, more fuel, and there are times your food and water load will vary.

    High end, second hand, lightly used gear can be had for 1/2 the cost of new. Shop here, ebay, etc.
    "That's the thing about possum innards - they's just as good the second day." - Jed Clampett

  13. #13

    Join Date
    05-05-2011
    Location
    state of confusion
    Posts
    9,866
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skinnbones View Post
    In preparation for a 2017 Thru hike. I'm very thin (140 lbs... that is where Skinnbones comes from) and wondering what my max total weight should be for my pack. I understand Ultra is the way to go, but my budget won't allow this. Also, have you seen many "under weight" hikers on the A.T.? Thanks.

    Underweight hikers on AT?

    Many thruhikers look downright emaciated by the time they reach maine.

    Lots of small women have toted 40 lb packs the whole way as well.
    Last edited by MuddyWaters; 04-22-2016 at 05:35.

  14. #14

    Default

    The Sherpas of Nepal typically carry 110 lbs and the women typically carry 88 lbs. But I understand, you want to have a enjoyable hike, so I'd say 60-70 lbs, that's easy weight for a female Nepalese Sherpa http://www.md.ucl.ac.be/iepr/loco_rec6EN.htm

  15. #15

    Default

    I'm not 140, but I'm not that far off. What I find problematic in carrying a load sometimes is my knees.

    A few thoughts:

    I carry neoprene knee braces. I put them on before long descents. It could be psychosomatic, but it seems to help.

    I don't carry a ton of water. Usually, if I know there are water sources every few miles, I just carry a liter. Obviously, when the situation warrants, I'll carry more.

    I wear relatively lightweight hiking shoes.
    (trailname: Paul-from-Scotland)

  16. #16
    Registered User mountainman's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-23-2010
    Location
    statesville, nc
    Age
    77
    Posts
    160
    Images
    2

    Default

    If you have the money to spent you could start with 11-12 lbs. base weight, before food and water.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
    If you have the money to spent you could start with 11-12 lbs. base weight, before food and water.
    "I understand Ultra is the way to go, but my budget won't allow this. Also, have you seen many "under weight" hikers on the A.T.? Thanks."
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-10-2005
    Location
    Bedford, MA
    Posts
    12,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
    If you have the money to spent you could start with 11-12 lbs. base weight, before food and water.
    Not exactly. This is a situation where skill and experience are required, and a willingness to just go without. If you could buy your way to UL status, more folks would do it. I've been backpacking for a few decades now and am happy with a base weight in the high teens. A few things keep me from that super low base weight -- eg., I never really got comfy with alcohol stoves, much less tarps. Not to mention camera, smartphone, external charger packs, etc.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    07-21-2014
    Location
    Bar Harbor, Maine
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skinnbones View Post
    In preparation for a 2017 Thru hike. I'm very thin (140 lbs... that is where Skinnbones comes from) and wondering what my max total weight should be for my pack. I understand Ultra is the way to go, but my budget won't allow this. Also, have you seen many "under weight" hikers on the A.T.? Thanks.
    Have you done any backpacking? If so how many days have you been out for without resupply and his did your body hold up?

    I suggest going out for some shakedown hikes to see what feels comfortable for you. I used to be fairly thin and a "heavy pack" was a struggle for me.

    What worked for me was to build up with strength training ( squats, deadlifts, etc) and eat enough quality food to support muscle growth.

    On the trail I plan my calorie needs per day to provide energy for the day without tapping into body stores (breaking down lean tissue) I do well with about 4500 cal/day.

    And lastly I have progressively reduced my base weight such that carrying a 7 day supply of food and gear feels pretty good from the start.

    What those numbers are for you is what you need to figure out by field testing. Good luck.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-31-2016
    Location
    Mount Dora, FL
    Age
    52
    Posts
    911

    Default

    Rafe hit the nail on the head when he said "the willingness to go without".
    One must sacrifice comforts for weight savings... the question every hiker has to ask themselves is what do I need, and what can I do without?
    I cannot sleep on a ridgerest or a z-rest pad, so I carry the extra weight of the Prolite Plus.
    I had a bad experience with cold weather sleeping, so in the season when "cold" weather could hit me, I carry a 0 degree bag (two pounds heavier than my summer bag).
    My backpack weighs 4.1 lbs
    My tent weighs 2lbs 2oz.
    winter sleeping bag weighs 4 lbs.
    prolite plus weighs 1 lb 4 oz
    making the basics just over 11.5 lbs.
    My summer backpack is down to about 36 lbs with food (for a week) and water. I imagine it will lighten up over time as I become more at ease with doing without some things.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •