They definitely prefer Hammocks over IKEA
Sent from my LGLS775 using Tapatalk
They definitely prefer Hammocks over IKEA
Sent from my LGLS775 using Tapatalk
I think bears like hammocks more in the cooler season, but prefer tents in the summer so as to keep bugs off.
This was meant as serious question. One could surmise that if a bear had option to investigate both a tent and a hammock that the choice would be biased towards one or the other. In the 2015 case the teen was in hammock but dad was in the tent. The bear went after the hammock. Why? Was it chance or some other factor? Did he just get to it first? Was it easier to detect by nose because of height profile? Do hammock campers emit more odor? The rangers said food was properly stored/hung in this case.
I think you're looking at this from the wrong perspective. Its not that the bear preferred a hammock over a tent. It's that they chose to camp in a very popular campsite, one that might already be familiar with bears. If I remember correctly it was a lone site at the meeting of several trails, and certainly a popular site. How do you know what the people the night before did? Did they clean properly, or just throw their food about not caring, since they are leaving?
I'd suggest you approach this as to camp in sites that are more remote and perhaps better cared for, and thus, bears will be less likely be looking for the next meal.
Im supposing there was less of a "Human Smell" at the child hammock site vs the tent with the full grown man. You cant understand that? Camp somewhere better is the point.
Bears are like women, you have to be emitting the right pheromones.
Blackheart
IMHO, it's probably because most hammockers tend to hang towards the edge of any kind of camp site. If it's a busy one, they would be encountered before most tenters. Just basing this on my own general hanging choices. When camping with my sons' Boy Scout Troop, I tend to be the one the farthest away from the group. I guess that would make me bear bait.
Time is but the stream I go afishin' in.
Thoreau
In the 2015 case in NC (GSMNP), both dad and boy were in hammocks.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/teen-detail...ry?id=31673101
Time is but the stream I go afishin' in.
Thoreau
I don't know about bears but I sure like Hammocks better than Tents.
Except for the proximity issue (below), then I think its about odor, or more truthfully, the lack thereof. See, in a hammock, you're more open. Does a bear care more about being able to see something its curious about? Maybe they do, but the fact is that if they're that close, we're then talking about tenters having as many encounters - which unscientifically, we've arrived at the convention that says that's not true. So we're talking about what gets them to that point, and what might sway them to go elsewhere.
So, what attracts bears? The 1.1 ripstop nylon of the hammock, or the cuben fiber of the tent? Well, neither of course. More like what repels them the least. Surely, bears are attracted to scents. Given a tent with a snickers, or hammock without, I'm going with the hypothesis of tents being more attractive. But all things being equal, you likely have captured more of your scent in a tent that you have in a hammock setup, and therefore, are repelling bears to a lesser degree in a hammock. Again, all things being equivalent and discounting the proximity issue (below), if a bear is following their nose that is attracted to something, they might come upon a hanger before they realize it. That's my hypothesis anyway.
You don't work for my city council do you?
Yes and no. Agreed that at most large, overused campsites, the only good trees to hang on tend to be around the perimeter. Depending on where you are, yeah, I think that can make a difference. On the other hand, these large sites typically have large groups of tents anyway, with or without hammocks there, too, and if bears were going to be around, at some point they'd be finding the guy in the tent with the snickers. Depends on where you hang I guess, but not really a hammock vs tent thing.
While I do think the last GSMNP issue was in part due to the guy's distance from the shelter, I tend to think a tenter would've had an issue, too. Except for my hypothesis above, though.
"I wonder if anyone else has an ear so tuned and sharpened as I have, to detect the music, not of the spheres, but of earth, subtleties of major and minor chord that the wind strikes upon the tree branches. Have you ever heard the earth breathe... ?"
- Kate Chopin
If more hiker smell is captured in a tent than a hammock then could it not also work against you if you had food odors on your clothes,hair,hands,etc.This makes me wonder if hanging smelly socks on the hammock suspension or ridgeline might be a good idea.
I subscribe to the theory that "location is everything" and that hammocks are more toward the perimeter of established camp sites which might make them more of a first target of opportunity for wildlife.
In any event,my hat is off to the father that attacked the bear that was attacking his son in GSMNP in 2015 with nothing but his bare hands.Or should that be Bear Hands?..........
Ba-dum pah!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"I wonder if anyone else has an ear so tuned and sharpened as I have, to detect the music, not of the spheres, but of earth, subtleties of major and minor chord that the wind strikes upon the tree branches. Have you ever heard the earth breathe... ?"
- Kate Chopin
Never had anything bump me on the trail.. Happens a lot when I hang on my property.. not sure if it's cats, possum, raccoons or what..
That would scare the omelets out of me... I think hearing it and being able to respond is far less disturbing than finding tracks that close and having slept through it.
This makes most sense to me. I haven't been in a tent in ages, but I do know I was less cautious in a tent than I am in the hammock.. with regards to food. I NEVER eat in the hammock. And as noted above, I do opt to be on the fringe of just about any site I hang in.. it's part of the appeal of hammock'ng in general and it does put you on the front line.
Exactly ^^^^
_______________________________________
The difficulty of finding any given trail marker is directly proportional to the importance of the consequences of failing to find it.
One thing is for sure,no bear will ever walk under my hammock because it's just too close to the ground.Higher than a porcupine most likley.I would like to know just how high off the ground that guy's hammock was and whether or not he was using a tarp when it happened.
I live in the east and have no experience with Brown Bears or Grizzlies. However, black bears, almost without fail are looking for some easy pickens food. They're not looking to eat people or for a fight. If you don't slob around camp with your food and hang it properly, you won't have a bear problem. The one-in-ten-thousand bear (usually a predatory male in the spring or late fall) that is looking to people as food, won't be stopped by a hammock or a tent. However, a hammock gives you much quicker egress if there's a problem. You can exit quickly from any direction. This is such an infrequent occurrence, it doesn't even cross my mind when I'm camping.
If you're talking about the guy I mentioned, it was a bottom-entry Hennessy hammock, so it was hung to be able to sit into it. Maybe 3 feet off the ground while he was in it? And yes, he was using a tarp - a lot of rain in the Smokies.
The bear footprints were close to one of the trees the hammock was hung from, not under the middle of the hammock. Woke the occupant up, and I think he spent the rest of the night WIDE awake.
The campsite was only 2 miles from a trail head so likely sees a lot of use, which probably explains why the bear was moseying through. We had our packs on the bear cables so nothing to keep it around.
-FA