I haven't been the Smokies that often, but I have visited Shenandaoh every year including the years you mentioned. I agree the deterioration is noticable, to a point.Originally Posted by Jack Tarlin
Much of Shenandoah's deterioration is air quality - reduced visibility & increased haze. I imagine the Smokies have had similar issues. The Clinton administration's major clean air initiative was the "new source review" to take on companies who exploited loopholes in the original Clean Air Act to make major changes to their older facilities without installing anti-pollution controls. The Bush adminstration rescinded the new source rules.
And let's not forget the government shutdown led by Newt Gingerich was caused by -among other things - riders to the FY 96 appropriations which prevented the Adminstration from enforcing the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and other environmental actions. What's become a classic Republican technique - sneaking these provisions into a must-pass appropriations bill without public hearings or debate - proved unsuccessful since Clinton had veto power. And environmental issues (along with education) were the primary reasons for his vetoes and the subsequent shutdowns. I worked for EPA at the time and remember the times well.
Re. national parks, the California desert parks (Death Valley, Joshua Tree, Mojave) acquired protection during Clinton's first 2 years (the only years he had a Democratic Congress). He also set aside the Grand Staircase/Escalante area of Utah as a National Monument and kept the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge from being drilled.
Yes notwithstanding my above points, I certainly agree that Clinton/Gore could have done more for national parks. But do you think that if they came forth with a comprehensive NPS plan including funding and necessary environmental safeguards, the Newt Congress would have given them a chance?