WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 39 of 39
  1. #21

    Default

    Some of the GMC may give the token sermon about responsible fires at established sites, but most won't care about a hobo stove as long as you're responsible.

    BTW, almost all of VT has been deforested (including the peaks) due to logging and fires in the last 2 centuries so the odds of endangering an old growth stand is almost zero. The Lamoille County forester told me that all of the bald peaks in the state were due to fires raging thru logging slash and incinerating the peaks and duff layers so that nothing has been able to re-establish.

  2. #22
    Registered User Panzer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-06-2005
    Location
    Bucks County, PA
    Age
    69
    Posts
    3,616
    Images
    11

    Default

    In the winter I've cooked hot dogs on a campfire. Had them on buns with ketchup and mustard. real good.. Otherwise, I usually always cook using one of my many stoves. The current one I'm using is the pocket rocket.

    Panzer

  3. #23

    Default

    Did Earl Shaffer use a Jetboil? I cooked with wood when I hiked last year. I plan to cook with wood when I hike later this year and any hikes in the future. You will not find any of my fuel canisters in a landfill.

  4. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-10-2005
    Location
    Bedford, MA
    Posts
    12,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rockhound View Post
    Did Earl Shaffer use a Jetboil? I cooked with wood when I hiked last year. I plan to cook with wood when I hike later this year and any hikes in the future. You will not find any of my fuel canisters in a landfill.
    That is interesting. In the two or three years that I carried a Zip stove on my section hikes, I never saw a thru-hiker carrying one.

  5. #25
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 4eyedbuzzard View Post
    I only use existing fire rings, usually at shelters or established camping areas. Otherwise I'll use a stove. But by getting rid of all the existing rings, don't you in some ways just wind up getting more new ones? Just wondering. It would seem that the best scenario is that people lessen impact by using existing rings rather than find all the old ones unusable and wind up building a new one.

    I am not sure, my source was watching a PBS program on Trail Maintaining in the Whites. I found it very interesting as they were taking state parks that were trashed by too much traffic and discussing in detail how to fix the areas. The before and after was very dramatic. The work of the young volunteers was impressive.



    Earl Shaffer didn't even have a tent, less a jet boil... yes he did use wood - someone mentioned his book Walking with Spring and I am into the first three chapters, very good read...
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  6. #26
    Registered User shelterbuilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-29-2007
    Location
    Reading, Pa.
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,844
    Images
    18

    Default

    I know that when I find a new firering on my section of trail, I'll toss the rocks as far into the brush as possible, scatter the ash/charcoal, and try to cover the evidence as best I can. It's a never-ending battle, but if you stop trying, I really think that you're saying that one person can't make a difference. And we can, you know....

    Just sayin'.

    terrapin, I get the feeling that most thru-hikers feel that, after "day after day" of hiking, there are better uses of your "down time" than having to gather fuel for a cook fire. I can understand this. Still, a "campfire" of any size - even one contained in a ZipStove - is psychologically re-assuring (at least to me) on some very ancient, primal level.
    Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass - it's about learning how to dance in the rain!

  7. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-10-2005
    Location
    Bedford, MA
    Posts
    12,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shelterbuilder View Post
    terrapin, I get the feeling that most thru-hikers feel that, after "day after day" of hiking, there are better uses of your "down time" than having to gather fuel for a cook fire. I can understand this. Still, a "campfire" of any size - even one contained in a ZipStove - is psychologically re-assuring (at least to me) on some very ancient, primal level.
    Agree on all counts... I eventually got tired of the fuss & bother of the Zip.

  8. #28

    Default

    Alcohol is pretty environmentally-friendly. An alcohol stove with fuel weighs less than a Zip.

    On the other hand, gathering a few twigs for cooking takes little time. Wouldn't the main objection be the mess? Smoke also prevents you from stealthing.

    One trick is to select nice firewood on the way to get water and pick it up on your way back to camp.

  9. #29
    Registered User TACKLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2005
    Location
    Laporte,PA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    86
    Images
    16

    Default

    If I got to a shelter before anyone was there,I'd light my Zip Stove in the shelter,and smoke out the bugs and mice so bad,they'd split for the night.

  10. #30

    Default

    If you like to cook with wood just buy a Bushbuddy, that eliminates the firering/scar problem.

  11. #31
    Registered User cowboy nichols's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-02-2006
    Location
    Tallahassee, Fl
    Age
    89
    Posts
    373

    Default

    I've used my zip for years and love it . It also is great when we have power outages. I have to have my coffee .

  12. #32

    Default

    I used a Zipp for a few years and still have it. Occasionally I think about taking it, but, really, it is a bit heavy compared with a few Esbits and a Heineken pot.
    Its best aspect, in my opinion, is that you can build your fire in a contained area, and when your cooking is done, you can dump the ashes into a stream to make sure they're out. Try that with a campfire!
    AND......... they're good for cooking (grilling) hot dogs, sausages, etc. Just bring a skewer about 16" long (I guess you could use it as a tent stake, but you never really know what's in the dirt your stake goes into.........).
    As I live, declares the Lord God, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that the wicked turn back from his way and live. Ezekiel 33:11

  13. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-08-2005
    Location
    By the tall marsh grass.
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    Nothing wrong with cooking over a fire except the extra clean up. Keeping things "clean" is problem enough without the soot.

  14. #34
    Registered User TACKLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2005
    Location
    Laporte,PA
    Age
    70
    Posts
    86
    Images
    16

    Default

    and toasting bagels

  15. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-13-2007
    Location
    Hayesville, NC United States
    Age
    74
    Posts
    361
    Images
    1

    Default wood fire cooking

    Quote Originally Posted by Frolicking Dinosaurs View Post
    A cooking fire involves collecting sticks from the ground that are no bigger around than your finger and using those. Green, freshly cut wood will not work. So no living tree is harmed in collecting the wood and I submit that the small amount taken will not adversely affect the environment unless many, many take the smll amount - something that is unlikely as most will not accept the downside to wood stoves -- soot.
    Exactly.
    You only need a tiny fire to boil water so you need little wood and there need be no trace at all. Learned this when I joined the scouts 40 years ago.
    Sailor

  16. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RBrownkatz View Post
    Exactly.
    You only need a tiny fire to boil water so you need little wood and there need be no trace at all. Learned this when I joined the scouts 40 years ago.
    Yup.

    The little woodstoves can't consume much anyway, but learned as a kid from my Native Alaskan friend how not to make a "white mans fire".

  17. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by k-spar View Post
    Alright, glad to hear we are all on the same page with this. Is there an easy way to find out when there is a fire ban?

    If you haven't already, pick up the 2007 Long Trail Guide. It breaks the trail up into sections and at the beginning of each section it gives you info on fires - whats allowed and whats not. If your allowed to have a fire in that section then there is no reason why you cant cook on it...

  18. #38
    Registered User weary's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-15-2003
    Location
    Phippsburg, Maine, United States
    Posts
    10,115
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frolicking Dinosaurs View Post
    A cooking fire involves collecting sticks from the ground that are no bigger around than your finger and using those. Green, freshly cut wood will not work. So no living tree is harmed in collecting the wood and I submit that the small amount taken will not adversely affect the environment unless many, many take the smll amount - something that is unlikely as most will not accept the downside to wood stoves -- soot.
    The dead sticks that are used for trail fires will soon decay anyway, releasing the same CO2 and other gases that burning releases. At least that is what the chemists I've talked to tell me. So burning is truly carbon neutral.

    Fire closures in Maine, anyway, aren't announced in advance. They totally depends on what the weather has produced. You can't get a fire permit when conditions are dry. Once it rains burning over night becomes legal again.

    I've been trying all spring to burn some invasive multi-floral roses and choke cherry brush I cut last fall to reopen my view of the water. I've managed to burn most of it. I'm waiting for a good rain before I finally burn the left over unburned ends and a few scattered piles of brush.

    Weary

  19. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by k-spar View Post
    Alright, glad to hear we are all on the same page with this. Is there an easy way to find out when there is a fire ban?
    Nothing easy. Fire restrictions change on a daily basis. It's been quite a few years since there were any summer time fire bans that I remember. They are usually early season, before thing green up and the trails are still snow covered.

    The NOAA website has fire forecasts and warnings here.

    They used to have fire danger scales on the ANR website, but not anymore.

    Links to info about camping fires and fire statistics on the Division of Forestry site, but nothing up to the minute.

    If I remember correctly the GMC website would have any fire dangers posted, but not sure if they post anything at trailheads into risky areas.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •