WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50

Thread: SLR Tri-pods

  1. #1
    Registered User Celeste's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-29-2010
    Location
    Northern VA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    40

    Default SLR Tri-pods

    Does anyone hike with SLR camera gear? Yeah I know, it packs on the pounds, but I'm going to do it and my mind's made up. Done it before, not for 4 months, but I'm going to go for it. It's 50% of my drive on the AT deu to a photography project im working on. Is anyone has, what tri-pod did you find to be the lightest but still sturdy enough to hold up an slr with decent lens weight? Nothing over the top huge...

  2. #2
    Registered User Megapixel's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-16-2009
    Location
    in the woods
    Age
    50
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    Does anyone hike with SLR camera gear? Yeah I know, it packs on the pounds, but I'm going to do it and my mind's made up. Done it before, not for 4 months, but I'm going to go for it. It's 50% of my drive on the AT deu to a photography project im working on. Is anyone has, what tri-pod did you find to be the lightest but still sturdy enough to hold up an slr with decent lens weight? Nothing over the top huge...

    joby gorillapod.

    http://www.postholer.com/ontrail
    2011 H.F.-Duncannon, Katahdin-Rangeley
    2012 Springer-Erwin



  3. #3
    Hiker bigcranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2002
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Age
    62
    Posts
    7,937
    Images
    296

    Default

    You might talk to this guy:

    http://benbenvieblog.com/2010/09/tel...o-worry-maine/

    IIRC he carried a gorillapod for a small part of the trail, but mostly not.

    If you try the JOby, you'll need the larger one. If you want something taller and more sturdy, something like one of the small Gitzo or Manfrotto or even the Feisol carbon fiber travel tripods will work, with a small ball head and an L-plate from Really Right Stuff.
    Ken B
    'Big Cranky'
    Our Long Trail journal

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-23-2006
    Location
    Melbourne,Australia
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,851

    Default

    Do you have the weight of your camera/lens combination ?
    Minimum acceptable (to you...) height ?
    Budget ?
    Franco

  5. #5
    Registered User SMSP's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-29-2008
    Location
    South MS
    Posts
    406
    Images
    27

    Default

    There is no point and shoot digital camera quality that can compare to an SLR.
    The detail you're gonna get will blow any point and shoot away IMO.

    SMSP
    South MS Patriot

  6. #6
    Registered User SMSP's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-29-2008
    Location
    South MS
    Posts
    406
    Images
    27

    Default

    There is no point and shoot digital camera quality that can compare to an SLR.
    The detail you're gonna get will blow any point and shoot away IMO.

    SMSP
    South MS Patriot

  7. #7

    Default

    have you considerred a monopod, like a tent pole with a tripod mount?

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-17-2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    65
    Posts
    5,131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SMSP View Post
    There is no point and shoot digital camera quality that can compare to an SLR. The detail you're gonna get will blow any point and shoot away IMO. SMSP
    How about these?

    http://www.dpreview.com/news/1011/10...dgrouptest.asp

  9. #9
    Registered User greentick's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-03-2005
    Location
    Deep South
    Age
    55
    Posts
    857
    Images
    204

    Default

    I have the large and small gorillapods. They pretty much work as advertised. You can get a level shot on uneven surfaces, wrap it around tree branches, or perch it on hiking poles (1 for small point/shoot, 3 for heavier cameras). I use an older ULA Circuit pack and the small one fits easy in the waistbelt pocket. The larger one I can reach behind me and hook one leg into a side pocket of the pack. The grippy rings keep it in place and it is alway accessible.
    nous défions

    It's gonna be ok.

    Ditch Medicine: wash your hands and keep your booger-pickers off your face!

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-31-2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Age
    45
    Posts
    4,276
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by burntoutphilosopher View Post
    have you considerred a monopod, like a tent pole with a tripod mount?
    I think a monopod should be mandatory for DSLR toting hikers. Tigoat has a monopod option for their carbon fiber trekking poles. Gossamer Gear has one too, but you have to have the poles with straps, which sadly I do not.

  11. #11
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leaftye View Post
    I think a monopod should be mandatory for DSLR toting hikers. Tigoat has a monopod option for their carbon fiber trekking poles. Gossamer Gear has one too, but you have to have the poles with straps, which sadly I do not.
    I took the straps out and replaced them with large wire tyes that allowed me to continue to strap them over the pack. Saved 3+OZ

    I TOO prefer the monopod and take my treking poles to be modified - drill a hole in the top insert the screw with a nut on. And epoxy it in. Come back the next day cut the head off, and unscrew the nut putting the grove back in as its removed. Monopods can be jambed point down in thick muddy dirt and offer terrific support, or just lean it against a tree and get back in the picture.
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  12. #12

    Default

    ^^ i guess i was more thinking of scenery than having to be freestanding and get in the frame.

    still, instead of carrying something extra; you simply use something you will have anyway for another use. might be worth the sacrifice

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Odd Man Out View Post
    None of those, afaik stop down to a small aperature for good depth of field. Also I think they have smaller sensors than DSLRs and interchangable lens compacts. It is a tough problem.
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-23-2006
    Location
    Melbourne,Australia
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,851

    Default

    The problem is actually not "not enogh" but too much ...
    Small sensors always give loads of depth of field, even at the widest aperture .
    The smaller the sensor , the more (apparent) depth of field.
    For shallow depth of field you do need a larger sensor.
    Franco

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Franco View Post
    The problem is actually not "not enogh" but too much ...
    Small sensors always give loads of depth of field, even at the widest aperture .
    The smaller the sensor , the more (apparent) depth of field.
    For shallow depth of field you do need a larger sensor.
    Franco
    In that case I need to be more careful about focus. I have too many pictures that are 95% in focus.
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  16. #16

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    Thanks, Franco

    FB
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  18. #18

    Default

    The last time I did the Hundred Mile Wilderness (9/09) is carried a Contax G2 with three Zeiss lenses, perhaps comparable to a good DSLR in terms of weight.

    I searched for an acceptable, affordable tripod and settled on the Slik Sprint Mini GM (780 g). It's not full height, but that didn't matter, it was high enough. I got a lot of great shots and had a wonderful time with this outfit. With a tripod and a shutter release, your focus problems are over. The biggest problem was low light in the dark green tunnel. Makes a tripod essential for anything beyond snapshots, IMO. Most of my offhand shots were out of focus; shutter speed was too dicey in low light, even with 400 film!

    I would never go for another trip like that without a great camera and tripod.

  19. #19
    Registered User Celeste's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-29-2010
    Location
    Northern VA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Thanks for all the suggestions, I'm checking out the link now. I am not satisified with a monopod with the type of night shots I'm looking forward to, the shutter will be open way too long and I must have a tripod.

  20. #20
    Registered User kayak karl's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-21-2007
    Location
    Swedesboro, NJ
    Age
    68
    Posts
    5,339
    Images
    25

    Default

    the fact that this is in ultra cracks me up. LOL
    I'm so confused, I'm not sure if I lost my horse or found a rope.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •