"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it always to be kept alive." -TJ
No plots; no conspriacies. Our individual wants require energy use so there's no need make the market fertile; it may not be a renewable energy source, but it is a renewable thirst. What hikers do is just one drop in the bucket, but our drop is just as dirty as everyone elses. We don't get brownie points for being hikers.
What's that sayin', Death by a thousand paper cuts...
[QUOTE=john gault;1140360]No plots; no conspriacies. Our individual wants require energy use so there's no need make the market fertile; it may not be a renewable energy source, but it is a renewable thirst. What hikers do is just one drop in the bucket, but our drop is just as dirty as everyone elses. We don't get brownie points for being hikers.
With the price of gas continuing to rise, our gasoline consumption will drop. Mine has already. Hate it or not we need energy to get to work, and to drive to the Appalachian Trail. I guess that is one way to lower traffic on the AT.
Freedom Walker, I am free to Walk, I am free to Run, I m free to live for You Lord Jesus, I am FREE!
He who the Son sets free, is free indeed.
Visit my blog Free To Hike
This is awesome.
Nothing says you can't just keep on truckin. Course you should smile and wave as you pass, that's just being "Southern" of course. Some folks even decide to skip the shelters. Hey man it's a hike, everyone should just walk their own style. : )
Well, I must confess that when someone offers me something sweet, on a hot, or on a warm -- or cold -- day, I tend to accept. Not with any pride. Just with a recognition, will power has its limits.
But from time to time I refuse the offered goodies. I wish more would do so. It is truly destructive of what the trail should be -- and used to be.
Last edited by weary; 04-04-2011 at 20:19.
Long time lurker - probably cranky from not hiking lately, but this topic gets to me as a dedicated provider of treats and vittles.
So long as people are free to walk the AT, people will be free to provide trail magic/charity/feeds along the way. Some of us enjoy doing so. Hikers are free to refuse.
Some will choose to spend their time and money on the trail, some will choose to spend their time and money feeding strangers.
People who believe that their personal conception of the A.T. experience is the only one valid for everyone fits the three major terms that float around "trail magic" threads - 'entitled', 'pathetic' and 'preachy'.
theres a guy on ebay seeking the ultimate trail magic
only starting at .99cents, you could win the chance to pay for his thruhike
looked up appalachian trail on ebay and couldn't believe it!
i usually just worked and saved up money for my trips
But everyone has a right to an opinion on this subject, correct?
And while hikers are free to refuse the bounty brought by others, it will change their hikes in some small way whether they take it or not, no?
Personally, I don't want to bring change to others on the AT who are in the middle of their hikes. I still think the Trail has enough to offer that RickB handing out beer and burgers won't be a net benefit to many (most) who I would meet. And I have been practicing my stories long enough that they would surely impress.
But in the end its not any one person's good intentions that will have any measurable impact on the character of OTHERS thru hikes. It is the collective weight of a many people's actions who might have an impact.
Is my opinion valid for everyone? No. But then again I won't be driving my car hundred of miles or more to interject/impact anyone else's journey (for good or bad).
Last edited by rickb; 04-07-2011 at 19:51.
You're showing our age Options. "Keep on Truckin." Lets resurect the Tshirt
Those that danced were thought mad by those who could not hear the music. George Carlin
This is what bothers me the most about trail magic, so called. The practicioners don't seem to realize that it has nothing whatever to do with whether a hiker stops and partakes or not.
Nor is anyone questioning your right to do so. It's not against the law, at least in most towns, on private property and at most road crossings.
But the practice is essentially selfish, changing the nature of the trail itself, in order to achieve a few feel good hours. Those who think otherwise, thruhiker or no, simply fail to understand what makes the trail unique.
"Remote for detachment, narrow for chosen company, winding for leisure, lonely for contemplation, the Appalachian Trail beckons not merely north and
south but upward to the body, mind and soul of man," said Harold Allen, one of the early AT volunteers. His wisdom was quoted by Myron Avery at the 1952 ATC conference, shortly before his death.
Last edited by weary; 04-07-2011 at 23:01.
It just seems like some of you just don't get it. Times change and so does the trail. Face it. It isn't the 1930's, 40's, 50's,60's, 70's, 80's or 90's. It is 2011 and the world is different now. You want to keep the trail from changing? Trail Magic in ANY form is not the problem. Stop building housing plans in the country. Stop building roads where they are certainly not needed. STOP BUILDING WAL-MARTS!
The people of this country build civilization closer and closer to the trail every year then complain about too many people out there doing the wrong (untraditional) things on the trail. If you want the trail to be as wilderness or just as isolated OR just rural as it was in the beginning...you would have to move it to Canada. I admire the loyalty of all on this thread arguing about rights and wrongs but to all, realize...times are changing and so is the trail whether you want it to or not.
In 1990 I remember crossing 1 old grown in logging road in the 100 Mile Wilderness.
In 2002 I watched several of my fellow hikers slack pack the entire section. The most "wilderness" of the AT is NO LONGER WILDERNESS. Hot dogs, burgers and beers won't change that for the better or worse...it is just how our country progresses.
geek
Bill Bryson says that when Earl Shaffer did his first thru more of the AT was on road walks and there were more backcountry general stores and small restaurants where Shaffer could eat than in the present day. It seems that the trend is, as more and more small businesses lose out to chains and as the AT Conservancy succeeds in consolidating the trail corridor, the trail keeps getting further and further from businesses that can provide sustenance to hikers.
This isn't a reference to trail towns. They're probably not going away any time soon. But as car ownership becomes closer and closer to 100 percent in rural areas, it becomes ubiquitous for people to drive to far away commercial strips where they likely will patronize a chain fast-food restaurant. There's no market for small-scale rural businesses anymore, no more, or far fewer, of the little stores people run out of the front room of their houses.
Does anybody know the quote I mean from Bryson? Page number?
If Bryson is right, the people who put on feeds might just be filling a need that was once satisfied by the small businesses close to the route of the AT in the 40's and 50's.
Things just ain't how they used to be ... and never were.
L Dog
AT 2000 Miler
The Laughing Dog Blog
https://lighterpack.com/r/38fgjt
"The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness." - John Muir
I'm certainly aware that times change, but it's not always progress. I can't control the building of Walmarts, though I got a few White Blazers upset by pointing out that all things at Walmart are not as inexpensive as they may think. Nor can I change population trends, or the desire of people to live in the suburbs.
But I still find it useful to build trails and work to make land available for the public to use. I can't donate much money because I don't have much money, though my wife and I manage to donate to our two land trusts from time to time. One land trust seeks to provide buffers for the trail in Maine. The Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust has purchased the summit ridge of Abraham one of the highest mountains of Maine, and part of the slopes of Saddleback. We are working to preserve other land in the high peaks section of western Maine.
Are you suggesting geek that because we can't provide buffers for all of the AT in Maine, protecting one mountain was unwise. That we need to recognize change is inevitable. That the so called wilderness is no more. That we should just recognize Maine's woods industry is dying. That we should let the condominiums take over.
I have found that just speaking out sometimes helps a little. One of the parking areas that serves one of our town land trust preserves was getting trashed. I posted a sign saying simply "Carry in, Carry out." People laughed. Don't you know society has changed? they asked. "No one will pay attention." But they did. Litter declined 90 percent.
I don't anticipate slowing the growth of unwise trail magic, by 90 percent, or by any percent. We'll just have to see.
Last edited by weary; 04-08-2011 at 00:51.