Hiking with DSLR...

[shwn354]

maybe try a lighter camera? that would be awful heavy

[jhunt87]

maybe try a lighter camera? that would be awful heavy

::stab::

[brian039]

Honestly I wouldn't want to hike with a good camera. It's just a matter of time before you break it or it gets wet.

[88BlueGT]

Honestly I wouldn't want to hike with a good camera. It's just a matter of time before you break it or it gets wet.

There is certainly a risk with bringing a 'nicer' camera hiking with you. I plan on using 'body & lens armor' on my camera as well to help with weather, dirt, etc. etc. etc. (http://www.cameraarmor.com/product/C...I400D,26,2.htm)
The camera that I am carrying is one of the lightest for DSLR's so its actually not THAT bad. I would like to try and limit all my camera equipment to 3-4lbs if possible. The problem isn't even weight but where to put it when I'm not using it. I typically fill my bag to the brim everytime I go out. Looks like I need some smaller gear!

[Hipneck]

I have a Canon T1i and I would LOVE to start bringing it out with me when I hike. Only problem is, I'm not sure how to carry it. I'm looking for some suggestion on how to carry without strapping it to my neck and bouncing all over the place while I'm hiking. Keeping it in the bag is an option as I will not stop to take a picture (unless its something great). Looking to make it easily accessible without being on my neck. Anyone have any suggestions?

Also, please do not comment on carrying a smaller point/shoot camera. If I wanted to bring my point and shoot I would, and yes I am aware that my DSLR is 'HEAVY', please no weight comments

Thanks guys!

I carry my Nikon in a Lowe Pro TLZ Pro AW chest pack. It holds my D-200 with up to a 80-200 2.8 attached. It also comes with a rain cover for the pack built in. Extra lens goes in my backpack or daypack.

[Arius]

On my attempt 2006 thru-hike: Canon 10D - #4 photo gear. Lost #25 of my body weight til reached NH. Not bad - minus #21. Isn't very convenient way to take the pictures on the long hike. But in some cases it was worth of it. I had no choice, because I was no willing to spend more money for additional small camera in my household . Now I'm carrying Canon S95. And I'm much happier hiker . Actually... just try. With best wishes.

[88BlueGT]

Thats sort of how I feel about it now. I typically bring my point and shoot but I really haven't been all that happy with it (Sony Cybershot) and than it recently broke. Soooo I can either go out and spend another $200 dollars for another point and shoot OR I can use the camera that I really want to bring and save the money, but add a few lbs to the bag. I have never used my DSLR on a hiking trip before so I will buy a carrying system, take it out and if I don't like it or don't want the hassle of the weight and maintenance on the trail than I won't bring it again. Pretty simple concept

I have a feeling it'll be worth it though! I brought it hiking in Argentina and it worked out pretty well even just dangling from a strap!

[88BlueGT]

I carry my Nikon in a Lowe Pro TLZ Pro AW chest pack. It holds my D-200 with up to a 80-200 2.8 attached. It also comes with a rain cover for the pack built in. Extra lens goes in my backpack or daypack.

I like that system as it provides protection for the camera while on your chest, nice setup.

[jbsbestfan]

Thanks for the great ideas folks. I have been carrying my Canon 60D with the 18-135 lens on day hikes and what a pain. I want some quality pics but the hand holding method has been cumbersome. I had gotten to where I just left it in my pack until I got to the good stuff. That cotton carrier system looks sweet. Before buying that, however, I might just get 2 of those rubberized s-binder clips and click it to my day pack like the straps that were suggested. One to each side. Glad I checked this page. Sorry I didn't have a solution.

[Shutterbug]

Honestly I wouldn't want to hike with a good camera. It's just a matter of time before you break it or it gets wet.

You are right that hiking with an expensive camera will eventually result in getting it wet. You will also get grit in the lense. Still, my biggest regrets aren't the cameras I have had to replace. They are the photographic opportunities I have missed. I have decided that live is too short to worry about wear and tear on cameras. Mine goes where I go.

[DuctTape]

I just wear mine around my neck - I loop it through my left arm to help keep it snug and prevent bouncing. I've been thru the JMT and CT carrying like it this, in addition to a whole lot of hiking in Grand Canyon.

[beerdavis]

I use a mountainsmith camera bag. It has a shoulder strap and a belt loop to attach it to your pack. It also comes with a rain fly which is nice when you get caught in the rain. I have the quickfire medium which is large enough to carry an 18-200 zoom lens with my D5000.


http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...ag_Medium.html

[Librarygeek]

I have an inland marine rider on my apartment renter's insurance - it covers my camera if it's lost, stolen, dropped, sat on, submerged, etc, whether home or away. I haven't specifically checked to see if hiking is covered, but I'll be looking into some of the straps mentioned here. I bought this camera, and I intend to use it. Like Shutterbug said, "I have decided that live is too short to worry about wear and tear on cameras. Mine goes where I go."

[gumball]

I use a small Lowepro camera bag with a built in rain cover and thread it through my hip belt on the front of my pack. I thought it would bother me, but it did not at all. I carry my Canon Xsi this way sometimes.