WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42
  1. #21
    Getting out as much as I can..which is never enough. :) Mags's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2004
    Location
    Colorado Plateau
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,002

    Default

    I carry a ziplock bag and a credit card only.

    Then I hitch to a town for a meal and lodging.

    Paul "Mags" Magnanti
    http://pmags.com
    Twitter: @pmagsco
    Facebook: pmagsblog

    The true harvest of my life is intangible...a little stardust caught,a portion of the rainbow I have clutched -Thoreau

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-07-2007
    Location
    Hamilton, NJ
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,551

    Default

    ^^ This guy knows what hes doing
    Smile, Smile, Smile.... Mile after Mile

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-29-2008
    Location
    West Palm Beach, Florida
    Age
    69
    Posts
    3,605

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 10-K View Post
    Another point along the same lines.. If you DO get injured it's a lot easier to keep moving with a light pack.

    I hurt my leg a few weeks ago hiking and had to go to the hospital. If I had been carrying my former 25# pack I doubt I could have hobbled out of the woods with it. I barely managed with a 12# pack.

    At 12 lbs I had everything I could possibly need to stay warm, dry and full - that's all I require.
    Do you regret not carrying an Ace bandage?
    The trouble I have with campfires are the folks that carry a bottle in one hand and a Bible in the other.
    You never know which one is talking.

  4. #24
    PCT, Sheltowee, Pinhoti, LT , BMT, AT, SHT, CDT, TRT 10-K's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-30-2007
    Location
    Erwin, TN
    Age
    62
    Posts
    8,492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WingedMonkey View Post
    Do you regret not carrying an Ace bandage?
    No, not really.

    You can't be prepared for every eventuality and have regrets in hindsight.

    I know that going in.

  5. #25
    PCT, Sheltowee, Pinhoti, LT , BMT, AT, SHT, CDT, TRT 10-K's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-30-2007
    Location
    Erwin, TN
    Age
    62
    Posts
    8,492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 88BlueGT View Post
    +35646830167

    It will never end, its the development of technology. If not a fabric, it will be something completely different, out of this world, kind of stuff. Just wait.......
    I do think we've seen all the major advances in weight savings. New materials may come along but the weight reductions will have to be made in ounces and grams.

    That's because all the way to save pounds have been achieved in most categories.

    For instance, a tarp that used to weight 2 lbs can now be had at 6-7 oz. No matter what kind of super-space age material is invented you're not going to be able to make another 1.5 lb reduction - otherwise the tarp would have a negative weight.
    Last edited by 10-K; 05-07-2011 at 07:06.

  6. #26
    Registered User russb's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-07-2007
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mags View Post
    I carry a ziplock bag and a credit card only.

    Then I hitch to a town for a meal and lodging.


    Lose the ziploc and save an ounce.

  7. #27
    Registered User Chop's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-09-2010
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    138

    Default

    I believe the next major advance will not be on the fabric front. Cuben is pretty stellar and will probably prove difficult to pass in a major way.

    Food would be the area where I anticipate the next weight savings. Think 3oz bar with 1000 healthy calories. Other things may shave weight, but I believe this will be the next frontier that makes a real weight difference.

  8. #28
    Registered User Zeno Marx's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-22-2010
    Location
    East of the Mississippi
    Posts
    65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chop View Post
    I believe the next major advance will not be on the fabric front.
    Maybe they'll make an ultralight fabric that is actually durable and that can last 30 years of real use, handling desert sun etc, that isn't as ridiculously expensive as Cuben or Dyneema. That's where I'd truly like to see advancement: price. I don't carry much Gore-Tex, but it continues to baffle me that it costs as much as it does. I'd hate to see these fabrics follow the same path.

  9. #29
    AT 2012
    Join Date
    09-11-2006
    Location
    Wallingford, CT
    Age
    72
    Posts
    1,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeno Marx View Post
    If you drop another 2 or 6 or 12 ounces, I'm willing to throw down serious money that you won't enjoy your outdoor adventures anymore than you do now. If you would, maybe it isn't the hiking, backpacking, and being outdoors that you really enjoy.
    I'm sure you're right, but for some of us there are two hobbies here...one is hiking, the other is monkeying around with gear. I love em both!
    Lazarus

  10. #30

    Default

    There is still progress to be made on gear we wear as well as hard goods--

    How about UL hiking poles that are durable (6oz delicate gossemer gear vs. 16oz Leki's).

    Tent poles that are lighter - My Tarptent Rainbow pole is 7oz.

    Lightweight fabrics that last (I wore a 2.5oz longsleeve on the PCT that I loved - It lasted 2 months). Montbell makes their wind shirt/pant combo that weighs 6oz combined - Imagine it it were waterproof/breathable.

    Shoes are heavy - I think Inov8 is on the right track, but light, comfortable, durable shoes would be great.

    More exotically, lightweight crampons/microspikes (currently 14oz is the lower boundary). An ice axe that weighs less that the Camp Corsa (i.e.: ULA potty trowel), but has the UIAA rating.

  11. #31

    Default

    More weight reduction can be had with better multi-use gear.

    There was a guy at the PCT kickoff who demonstrated his new bear canister (it's been approved, too.) It was a clear plastic container like the Bear Vault, but the titanium lid doubled as a pan for cooking. So now you can leave your cook pot home and save some weight in bear country.

    Here's a link. http://lighter1.com/
    Some knew me as Piper, others as just Diane.
    I hiked the PCT: Mexico to Mt. Shasta, 2008. Santa Barbara to Canada, 2009.

  12. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeno Marx View Post
    If you drop another 2 or 6 or 12 ounces, I'm willing to throw down serious money that you won't enjoy your outdoor adventures anymore than you do now. If you would, maybe it isn't the hiking, backpacking, and being outdoors that you really enjoy.
    .

    Well said. You drop big bucks to drop 3 pounds. I doubt I would even notice - there's better things to think about.

  13. #33
    Saw Man tuswm's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-14-2008
    Location
    Philly/ OC MD
    Age
    43
    Posts
    776
    Images
    25

    Default

    I have noticed that several weight saving idea come when designing things for multiple use like hiking poles and tents that use them. And packs that use sleeping pads for frames.

    But the lighter I get the less I want hiking poles. And now I use a neo air over my Z rest not for weight but for comfort. So what about a pack frame that comes out and can be used as a pole for a tent? That would save about a pound for most people.
    "you cant grow old if you never grow up" ~TUswm

  14. #34
    Garlic
    Join Date
    10-15-2008
    Location
    Golden CO
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,615
    Images
    2

    Default

    Another source for UL gear innovation is the adventure racing industry. I got my light weight ice axe from a site that caters to eco-challenge racers and the like. There's actual prize money there, so there's a push to develop gear that you don't get from dirt bag thru hikers (I mean that with all possible respect, Mags).

    For myself, I agree that I can't visualize getting my pack much lighter, ever. But then again, remember that at the end of the 19th century, main-stream scientists thought that everything was pretty much already discovered, with just a few minor loose ends to tie up. Then Einstein came along with some pesky theories....
    "Throw a loaf of bread and a pound of tea in an old sack and jump over the back fence." John Muir on expedition planning

  15. #35
    Registered User Pixelgator's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-11-2011
    Location
    Cleveland, GA
    Age
    77
    Posts
    43

    Default 12 # for 250 miles!

    Quote Originally Posted by 10-K View Post
    Another point along the same lines.. If you DO get injured it's a lot easier to keep moving with a light pack.

    I hurt my leg a few weeks ago hiking and had to go to the hospital. If I had been carrying my former 25# pack I doubt I could have hobbled out of the woods with it. I barely managed with a 12# pack.

    At 12 lbs I had everything I could possibly need to stay warm, dry and full - that's all I require.
    I'd be interested in seeing your pack list.

  16. #36
    Getting out as much as I can..which is never enough. :) Mags's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2004
    Location
    Colorado Plateau
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,002

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garlic08 View Post
    (I mean that with all possible respect, Mags).
    No worries. The R&D-type folks always push the envelope; people like me find a way to put it to practical use. It's all good.
    Paul "Mags" Magnanti
    http://pmags.com
    Twitter: @pmagsco
    Facebook: pmagsblog

    The true harvest of my life is intangible...a little stardust caught,a portion of the rainbow I have clutched -Thoreau

  17. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 10-K View Post
    I do think we've seen all the major advances in weight savings. New materials may come along but the weight reductions will have to be made in ounces and grams.

    That's because all the way to save pounds have been achieved in most categories.

    For instance, a tarp that used to weight 2 lbs can now be had at 6-7 oz. No matter what kind of super-space age material is invented you're not going to be able to make another 1.5 lb reduction - otherwise the tarp would have a negative weight.
    10-K,

    I agree with your point. The truth is the equipment has been out for years but there is a human factor of hikers wanting more toys. For example. When I first thru-hike back in 1989 when I wanted to call home I went into town and used a pay phone. Now many hikers carry cell phones with chargers. Cell phones are small and light these days but they also are another toy that is not really needed that is added in to hikers gear list. Hikers like their toys to carry. That where the weight really adds up.

    Wolf

  18. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2010
    Location
    Morgan Hill, Ca
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 10-K View Post
    Do you really think there is that much more juice left to squeeze?
    Yes! The day "we" as a race decide to stop pushing into new paradigms is the day we should all just lay back and wallow in complacency. I agree with an above post that so many of the envelopes that have been pushed move to mainstream. This happens in every industry, not just recreation, and we all benefit. I look at it this way. Due to so many advancements in light weight materials and effective designs and uses for them, I can now take myself and my daughter (a 5-year old adventurer extraordinaire) on a weekend backpacking trip, with many of the "luxuries" that used to be considered unacceptable, have a great time, and carry no more weight than I used to for a solo overnight just a few year back. That is what I call progress! Imagine some day, being able to do the same, but for a family of 4! Yes... keep on advancing Industry!

  19. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-27-2011
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    394

    Default

    There has to be someone out there who can replace down as the insulator of choice in sleeping bags and insulator vest/jacket.

    Strikes me as the easiest "next advance" to drop significant weight from those hikers who already have their base weight in the 8-10 lb range.

    Fabrics have come a long way in the last 20 years but insulators haven't.

  20. #40
    Saw Man tuswm's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-14-2008
    Location
    Philly/ OC MD
    Age
    43
    Posts
    776
    Images
    25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leanthree View Post
    There has to be someone out there who can replace down as the insulator of choice in sleeping bags and insulator vest/jacket.
    Ask and you shall receive, argon fill. adjust the gas fill and pressure to adjust level of insulation.

    http://www.klymit.com/
    "you cant grow old if you never grow up" ~TUswm

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •