Actually this does not prove anything in my post erroneous. No where did it say no one has ever been killed by a bear that has lost its fear of people. It only said that they do not become more likely to attack and the incident that you posted does not dispel this.
Quote from your link:
"We don't know for sure, but we feel it was one of the bears who regularly came to her residence."
I am not young enough to know everything.
Once while deer hunting with my 30-06 I had a bear come close by me and when he saw me he appeared scared and hurried off. Another time, when I was sleeping in a shelter, unarmed, a bear came by and he showed no fear despite my yealing and shinning a flashlight on him. He left when he was good and ready.
Panzer
btw
freon horns have been proven an effective way of driving off polar bears and grizzlies.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3872649
http://books.google.com/books?id=gFl...20horn&f=false
Just because a bear runs away or generally stays clear of humans doesn't mean it is afraid. Weary might be a better word, or cagey. Who knows really, unless you are a bear. I like to think of them as weary. We have 1 for every 2 square miles, on average, and I never see them. Thank goodness they are weary. I try to do my part, but I think it has more to do with the bear hunting. I am not a fan of bear hunting because bait and wait is hardly sport, but it is effective in maintaining a weary bear demographic.
lol
Yeah, I guess I did mean wary. I thought the two were spelled the same. As for Weary, wouldn't mind bumping into him in Maine some day. Should I put bells on my pack, so as not to surprise him ?
We can't use bait here in VA for any hunting BTW. I do believe hunting pressure would make bears more wary of humans. I would rather bears are conditioned to "smell human, run away".
Your post did say this:
"Of the 60 something people killed by black bears since 1900 none were accustomed to being fed or petted. "
The bear in question was presumably accustomed to being fed, (in a later article I think it was verified i posted an early one from the incident, though Im not sure how they verify it, maybe the contents on the stomach also had food linked to the womans feeding as well as her remains.)
So it still appears that statement is incorrect.
All the supporting arguements consist of stories of places where people have routinely fed bears, but no one ever was attacked, so that seems to be the arguement of the piece. That bears which are fed dont attack.
They may not be more prone to attack, I agree. But the simple fact that feeding or petting creates exponentially more contact than avoiding those activities , in itself means that there will be incidents.
By the way I would take all statistics like these with a grain of salt. There are unreported, mis-reported, and erroneous information in there.
A local diver I know is in the books as a victim of an unprovoked shark attack. I wouldnt say the shark was unprovoked, he had a spear in him at the time. People dont always report the whole truth, and authorities cant always piece together facts very well.
NH bear attack May 21, bear killed:
http://www.wmur.com/news/28034082/de...#ixzz1NUylxJ64A bear believed to have injured a Center Harbor woman this week has been killed, wildlife officials said.
The bear was a large adult male that exhibited aggressive behavior, according to the Fish and Game Department. It was shot by a Fish and Game officer Wednesday night near the location of several recent incidents involving bears, people and pets.
The department said the bear was shot in the same neighborhood where Jacqueline Berghorn, 55, was injured when she was swatted by a black bear outside her home. Her injuries were not life-threatening.
...
Garabedian said he believes the bear came habituated to being around people because of finding food at homes. He said the bear was no longer afraid of people.
...
Garabedian said previous residents of the neighborhood where the bear was killed had a history of feeding bears.
...
You are correct about all the facts not getting reported. If you will do some more research on the article you posted you will find that her son said that he had just gotten off the phone with her and she was going to try and protect a smaller bear form a large bear with her broom. Draw your own conclusions but the statement may well still be true but hell only one is still not a significant number in the overall scheme of things, except of course to the paranoid.
I am not young enough to know everything.
A black bear will normally run from a determined woman with a broom. Unless it has learned that humans are friendly. In the overall scheme of things the vast majority of black bears choose to avoid humans. Those that choose to chum for bears have reason to fear black bears. And those that resort to name calling when their argument is proven false may want to take another look at their position.
Sly, at least one of the bears that have wandered into areas where they have not lived in well over 100 years has lost their life without feeding anyone or anything http://www.wral.com/lifestyles/pets/story/9641662/
My whole point is that bears are being protected to the point that their own quality of life is being degraded. The bear population in NC continues to grow. Much like deer and Canadian geese. And thanks for the personal attack.
"Of the 60 something people killed by black bears since 1900 none were accustomed to being fed or petted. "
The way this reads is that none of the people were accustomed to being fed or petted. Too funny!
As I live, declares the Lord God, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that the wicked turn back from his way and live. Ezekiel 33:11
My wife and I were hiking southbound in SNP this week and met Moosehead between Gravel Springs and Pass Mountain. He confirmed that it was his tent that was destroyed by the bear. Another hiker had left food outside his (not Moosehead's) tent near the Bear Fence Hut. Moosehead's tent was in the same location. We spoke to the Park Service ranger who wrote the incident report. Apparently, it is quite common for SNP bears to associate tents with food - food does not have to be in or around the tent for a bear to take notice and decide to "open the bag". A target of opportunity.
The ranger (she was working the Swift Run Gap entrance station) also told us about a woman that had her RV at Lewis Mountain (just south of Bear Fence), but pitched a Walmart pup-tent to "store their food so the bears would leave their RV alone." This woman did not lose her food or her pup-tent (or her RV for that matter), but the ranger said the local bears could not have had a better teacher.
So, the moral to the story might be: "It doesn't matter if nothing happened to you because you cooked or stored food in your tent. It does matter to the guy who did things right and still lost his tent."