WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41
  1. #1

    Default Lightest rucksack that can carry 45lbs comfortably?

    Hi all, I currently have two lowe alpine rucksacks that are roughly 5.2lbs each and can carry up to 77lbs very comfortably all day long if need be.
    My question for you guys is this; does there exist a rucksack that is no more than 3.75lbs in weight that is capable of carrying a 44lb load very comfortably all day long? The reason I give 3.75lb as a maximum weight is because I want at least a 1.5lb drop it weight to justify spending the $$$ on a new lighter rucksack, anything less wouldn't really justify the costs.
    I eagerly await your reponses!

  2. #2
    Registered User BigBlue's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-19-2008
    Location
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Age
    57
    Posts
    80
    Images
    2

    Default

    Probably is one somewhere. A better question is, why would you want to carry a 44lb load? Rather than look for a new pack I would take a serious look at my gear, and try to cut the weight by a half. 25lbs on your back will make hiking a lot more enjoyable than close to 50.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigBlue View Post
    Probably is one somewhere. A better question is, why would you want to carry a 44lb load? Rather than look for a new pack I would take a serious look at my gear, and try to cut the weight by a half. 25lbs on your back will make hiking a lot more enjoyable than close to 50.
    Maybe he wants carry 30 lbs of food for a 15 day trip.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-18-2007
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    1,610
    Images
    36

    Default

    I think that someone needs to calculate an age-weight limit that becomes WB law

    At 18, join the special forces and run with 125 lbs...............................scale the math down from there.

    Q

  5. #5

    Default

    Hey guys I'm doing an unsupported 418km thru-hike in summer 2013 and believe me I have been dilligently lighteing my items of kit and spening plenty of $$ in the process. The food and water takes 25lbs on it's own, the other 18lbs is absolutely everything else from my pack to my shoes.

    The pack itself is the last item of kit I could save a few lbs on so hence my question here.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-19-2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    76
    Posts
    1,979
    Images
    1

    Default

    I'm pretty sure my ULA Catalyst could, but I certainly wouldn't!

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-10-2012
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, PA
    Posts
    21

    Default

    The Kifaru KU line will allow you to carry that much weight.

    Here is a link for there KU 3700 at 2lbs. 9oz.

    http://kifaru.net/KU3700.html


    TRU ...

  8. #8
    Coach Lou coach lou's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2011
    Location
    Madison, Connecticut
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,788
    Images
    400

    Default

    A.l.i.c.e.

  9. #9
    Coach Lou coach lou's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2011
    Location
    Madison, Connecticut
    Age
    66
    Posts
    4,788
    Images
    400

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Del Q View Post
    I think that someone needs to calculate an age-weight limit that becomes WB law

    At 18, join the special forces and run with 125 lbs...............................scale the math down from there.

    Q

    I think the basic idea of what you say has merit and is worthy of discussion. Maybe in Walters forum.......when I don't have games

  10. #10
    Hike On!!!!! Many Moons's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-12-2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, North Carolina
    Age
    62
    Posts
    375
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default look at this

    Quote Originally Posted by d3v View Post
    Hi all, I currently have two lowe alpine rucksacks that are roughly 5.2lbs each and can carry up to 77lbs very comfortably all day long if need be.
    My question for you guys is this; does there exist a rucksack that is no more than 3.75lbs in weight that is capable of carrying a 44lb load very comfortably all day long? The reason I give 3.75lb as a maximum weight is because I want at least a 1.5lb drop it weight to justify spending the $$$ on a new lighter rucksack, anything less wouldn't really justify the costs.
    I eagerly await your reponses!
    I bought a Osprey Atmos 65L. It is right at your weight u want and it feels real comfortable to me with a load in it. I carried 45 lbs last year on 108 miler with a cheap Dick's Field and Stream 65L pack. So this year with the Atmos and a lighter load 32 or less hope this pack will do. I am still way to heavy for the more experienced hikes on this site. Check out the reviews and I found it lists at REI for $240 , but found and bought on Amazon for $151 at Al's Sport.com Hike On!!!


    Miller

  11. #11
    Registered User moytoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-10-2009
    Location
    Titusville, Florida, United States
    Age
    76
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Del Q View Post
    I think that someone needs to calculate an age-weight limit that becomes WB law

    At 18, join the special forces and run with 125 lbs...............................scale the math down from there.

    Q
    That formula works out to about 1lb per year for TW. Just guessing TW's age of course.
    KK4VKZ -SOTA-SUMMITS ON THE AIR-
    SUPPORT LNT

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Del Q View Post
    I think that someone needs to calculate an age-weight limit that becomes WB law

    At 18, join the special forces and run with 125 lbs...............................scale the math down from there.

    Q
    Quote Originally Posted by moytoy View Post
    That formula works out to about 1lb per year for TW. Just guessing TW's age of course.
    Ha ha ha. Problem is, the formula doesn't take into account the current slew of 18 years old who want to start out with a 10 lb pack. By age 50 they'll either be going out in a loin cloth with a q-tip first aid kit or calling it quits, wising up and carrying 75 lbs.

  13. #13

    Default

    For that weight load I'd be looking at an external frame pack. It will still be about 5 pounds, but a lot more comfortable to carry than a internal frame.
    Follow slogoen on Instagram.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-05-2011
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Age
    65
    Posts
    141

    Default

    I have an Osprey Aether that could do it comfortably. Only been used one time because I decided to go ultralight. Pm me if you are interested.

  15. #15

    Default

    I have an older Camp Trails Adjustable II external frame backpack that would meet your requirement. It weighs just under 4 pounds and will be as comfortable as anything with 40+ pounds (although it is a stretch to call that weight comfortable). You can still find this pack on eBay on occasion but last time I looked it seemed there were some versions that weighed closer to 5 poounds. Maybe they varied by year? On my scale mine is 3 pounds 14 ounces.

  16. #16

    Default

    The Deuter ACT 50 could definitely take that weight. 3# 5oz.

  17. #17
    Registered User russb's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-07-2007
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by perrymk View Post
    I have an older Camp Trails Adjustable II external frame backpack that would meet your requirement. It weighs just under 4 pounds and will be as comfortable as anything with 40+ pounds (although it is a stretch to call that weight comfortable). You can still find this pack on eBay on occasion but last time I looked it seemed there were some versions that weighed closer to 5 poounds. Maybe they varied by year? On my scale mine is 3 pounds 14 ounces.
    I have two different external frame packs from back in the day. Both made by WFS. Both are under 4 pounds as well. One is 3#14oz, the other is 3#9oz. I still use the "heavier" one on occasion if the trip necessitates it. Beauty of having numerous packs is I can choose the right tool for the job.

  18. #18

    Join Date
    08-04-2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, Fla
    Age
    67
    Posts
    686
    Images
    8

    Default

    Take a look at the Gregory line. A little heavier than what you need, but you can get it down by removing the top pocket and misc other stuff on the pack. I bought one for a heavy-weight trip, and I cant believe how comfortably they carry weight.
    Forget not that the earth delights to feel your bare feet and the winds long to play with your hair. -Kahlil Gibran

  19. #19

    Default

    Hey guys I've looked in to every suggestion made here, even creating an excel spreadsheet to highlight the pro'/con's of each pack, however I've tweaked and refined my kit list to be 41lbs which is closer to the recommended maximum carry load for these ultralight packs that are on the market, now the only thing stopping me is the cost! Thanks for all your suggestions.

  20. #20
    Registered User Donde's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-27-2009
    Location
    Gypsy
    Age
    38
    Posts
    454

    Default

    Look into an REI Flash 62.

    No 18 y/os in SF they ain't smart enough yet, but if you want see somebody carrying crazy ruck look at a 60mm mortar crew.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •