WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 43
  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BostonBlue View Post

    Best way to get donations? Go to www.kickstarter.com and appeal to your friends.
    Some people have no shame. I'm beginning to hate the campaigns that help, or solely, fund a hike with a passion.

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    Some people have no shame. I'm beginning to hate the campaigns that help, or solely, fund a hike with a passion.
    I have never asked for a dime on kickstarter and have funded several thousand in projects I believed in over the past few years. At least 3 or 4 were AT related. Most of the others were for the production of CDs or books. I believe that most of the AT projects involved producing a video in some form. To me, the Google Glass would revolutionize the way that others view the AT IF they held up or he was very sure-footed. But make no mistake, he WOULD have to produce a video or book or whatever - or his investors could/would sue him for fraud.

    Bottom line is contribute if you believe in the person or the cause - if not, don't contribute. But there is no "shame" involved in following your dreams and determining the best way to accomplish your goals.

    To ME, the shame is when people who have no hiking experience whatsoever tell the world they are going to set a "world record on the AT." Or they are going to raise funds for a non-profit organization. They set up a glitzy website and the donations and sponsors pour in. Three weeks later they quit for one reason or another and the money is never returned.

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-01-2012
    Location
    Cleveland, TN
    Age
    49
    Posts
    8

    Default

    The battery life is about 2 hours of video recording, so you not getting much recorded each day.

    Also this is Google, and they NEVER finish anything. I think as a company they have A.D.D. This will be something that will be forgotten or kill off in 3 years.
    "No other race in the universe goes camping, Owen. Celebrate your uniqueness."

  4. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-18-2013
    Location
    St. Louis Park, MN
    Age
    37
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HikerMomKD View Post
    Andrew... I don't know about this glass for the AT but you should def. get your own avatar on WB. It's 10 bucks.
    I'm not sure what the e-cards are, but I felt as though I NEEDED them, so my avatar costed $50. The AT is going to break me

  5. #25
    The Local Johnny Reb
    Join Date
    03-29-2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Age
    40
    Posts
    462
    Images
    27

    Default

    I swear we are heading towards 1984 (the book)

    between google glass and now Xbox is coming out with basically a webcam that can hear/listen/see in the dark. and get this... it has to be plugged in 24/7!!!!

    No hiding from Big Brother now people! haha
    -Jason

  6. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-17-2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Age
    47
    Posts
    299
    Journal Entries
    12

    Default

    when they get stolen u are going to be so upset and so out of all that cash you could have saved and done something productive with like hiked without the worry of breaking or losing them. is there insurance and a warranty on them? how are they in rain and on rock, under your foot, crushed in a pack? sounds like a poor investment for a hike. good luck!

  7. #27
    Registered User kythruhiker's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-10-2002
    Location
    Beattyville, Kentucky, United States
    Age
    51
    Posts
    198
    Images
    6

    Default

    The plus side, maybe there will be a wildlife identification app, so you can identify properly the angry snake you just stepped on while reading your heads up display The battery life on the developer incarnation of these glasses is next to nil. I've heard reports of 45 minutes to an hour continuous recording at best. I guess you could line your pack with 20 nPower Pegs and hope for the best!

  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Ferk View Post
    I'm not sure what the e-cards are, but I felt as though I NEEDED them, so my avatar costed $50. The AT is going to break me
    Cool Avatar Andrew... & wow- a Silver Member to boot.... I don't know what e-cards are either but looks like you're all set. Yeah, the AT has a way of breaking us all, one way or another.

  9. #29

    Default

    "I could record the mice crawling over my face."

    too FUNNY! For $1500 dollars! Hey, I have a bridge I can sell you too!

    Can we watch you take a poop with audio too? & you pay $1500 dollars for our amusement, lol!

    google glasses are a dip***** idea, In my not so humble opinion.

  10. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-18-2013
    Location
    St. Louis Park, MN
    Age
    37
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordpen View Post
    "I could record the mice crawling over my face."

    too FUNNY! For $1500 dollars! Hey, I have a bridge I can sell you too!

    Can we watch you take a poop with audio too? & you pay $1500 dollars for our amusement, lol!

    google glasses are a dip***** idea, In my not so humble opinion.
    You're not the only one to think that. I'm not going to disagree with the problems of glass while hiking. Mother nature, a tumble, or having them incorrectly placed in your pack all have the potential of breaking them. Most of the time you won't have your phone on and you probably won't be getting a data connection, and a lot of the benefits of the glass are missing when you are offline. This leaves you with pretty much a camera and video recorder which really eats through the battery quickly.

    What I am finding a little disheartening are the number of articles and comments on the internet with glass and glass owners being associated with "glasshole", Big Brother, being a tool, narcissistic, etc. No doubt there is the potential for glass and glass owners to be associated with these terms, but it is not limited to glass and it does not encompass all glass. I absolutely do not want to be viewed as any of these simply because I have a pair of glass. I have no intentions of invading people's privacy or becoming disconnected from the world. I see a lot of potential with glass for applications involving health and fitness, weather, and nature. kythruhiker mentioned a wildlife identification app; this is actually a great idea. It may be because I'm still young, have a career in technology and software, and have a passion for the future, but I don't fear or associate it as it seems many others have. I see the potential it has to improve certain aspects of life. I also see the possibility of it completely failing, but without trailblazers we will never know.

  11. #31

    Default

    Well, I hope you have fun with them, sorry if I came across too harsh.

    I guess the thing that bothers me the most, is the potential for invasion of privacy (of which Google is very good at doing that). If you personally can keep it from being so, you will be one of the few, that can resist that temptation.

  12. #32

    Default

    I admit I don't "get" the google glass. Then again I am one of the 5 remaining people on the planet who is not on Facebook.

    That said, I know folks who said that Internet thing was a passing fad that "would never catch on"...

    Good luck whatever you do. Keep us posted.
    Want a 'Hike Your Own Hike' sticker?... => send me a message <=


    Favorite quote;
    Quote Originally Posted by sailsET View Post
    My guess is that you are terribly lost, and have no idea how to the use the internet.

  13. #33

    Default

    I really wish Google Chrome would come out with a 64-bit version...

    Much more needed than glass.

  14. #34
    Registered User Kookork's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2011
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,325
    Images
    12

    Default

    45 minutes charge time is not the best operation time for a battery related camera/camcorder but if you manage your usage time wisely between the charges and do not lose or break it , it is a neat idea but nothing original or revolutionary. They are the tools of future and some can use them when in infancy. You could be the one if you could afford.

  15. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-17-2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Age
    47
    Posts
    299
    Journal Entries
    12

    Default

    Is there a way to tell when it is recording? I mean if you walk up and are recording how do i know? If you are recording and dont tell me i am apt to get rather hostile. then where your eye was there is a glasshole. privacy is an issue that some of us are finding more difficult to maintain. i understand the utility that glass may offer and the potential that it brings. however, i do think that you should remain cautious about who, where and how you use it around.

  16. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-18-2013
    Location
    St. Louis Park, MN
    Age
    37
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snifur View Post
    Is there a way to tell when it is recording? I mean if you walk up and are recording how do i know? If you are recording and dont tell me i am apt to get rather hostile. then where your eye was there is a glasshole. privacy is an issue that some of us are finding more difficult to maintain. i understand the utility that glass may offer and the potential that it brings. however, i do think that you should remain cautious about who, where and how you use it around.
    Apparently when you are recording or taking a picture there is an ambient glow.

    I totally agree with you on other people's privacy; just because I'm allowing Google to get a closer look at my life, it doesn't give me the right to creep on the privacy of others. If I happen to have a video going for whatever reason as I'm hiking (or doing anything), I imagine I will either stop recording or continue going on my marry ole way without paying anyone attention. If they happen to gain my attention while I'm recording and I have any reason to share it, I will definitely tell them that I was recording. If they don't like the idea, I'll delete. Also, maybe I'll meet someone really cool when I'm not recording. I may think it would be a good idea to share this person with the world or a conversation we are having. Again, I would get the person's opinion and permission on it before I do say.

    More than likely, I would probably be hesitant with these initially and actually remove them from my face when I approach a person or crowd.

    I'm sure there will truly be someone who deserves to be called "glasshole" and does something totally inappropriate with the glass. But honestly, they were probably already doing inappropriate things.

  17. #37
    Registered User Kookork's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2011
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,325
    Images
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Ferk View Post
    Apparently when you are recording or taking a picture there is an ambient glow.

    I totally agree with you on other people's privacy; just because I'm allowing Google to get a closer look at my life, it doesn't give me the right to creep on the privacy of others. If I happen to have a video going for whatever reason as I'm hiking (or doing anything), I imagine I will either stop recording or continue going on my marry ole way without paying anyone attention. If they happen to gain my attention while I'm recording and I have any reason to share it, I will definitely tell them that I was recording. If they don't like the idea, I'll delete. Also, maybe I'll meet someone really cool when I'm not recording. I may think it would be a good idea to share this person with the world or a conversation we are having. Again, I would get the person's opinion and permission on it before I do say.

    More than likely, I would probably be hesitant with these initially and actually remove them from my face when I approach a person or crowd.

    I'm sure there will truly be someone who deserves to be called "glasshole" and does something totally inappropriate with the glass. But honestly, they were probably already doing inappropriate things.
    From what I see it seems that you have a solid core value and won't invade the privacy of anybody intentionally. If it glows enough for me ( the passenger ) to recognize that the camera is recording then the manufacturer( Google) is recognizing my privacy,If not then it can be hazardous if the user does not have the high core values you follow.

  18. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-18-2013
    Location
    St. Louis Park, MN
    Age
    37
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kookork View Post
    From what I see it seems that you have a solid core value and won't invade the privacy of anybody intentionally. If it glows enough for me ( the passenger ) to recognize that the camera is recording then the manufacturer( Google) is recognizing my privacy,If not then it can be hazardous if the user does not have the high core values you follow.
    I appreciate what you said.

    I just wonder if glass is what we should be most worried about. I understand that it's a new technology and we don't know what it will be capable of doing (or what other technologies will produce in the next few years). I've seen many videos on youtube that invade people's privacy, and that was before glass. You may consider glass less conspicuous, but I'd like to counter that. Many people use their phones to play games, use apps, or browse the web; there is no reason a person cannot pretend to be doing this as they are recording. And in case you are wondering what type of videos I'm watching on youtube, they are mostly prank videos. I do find them amusing, and I'm pretty confident that they get the people's permission to share after the prank. Also, I believe they have a guy hiding or trying to be incognito as he records; again, glass not needed.

    And if I were to get the glass, I have a feeling that I will get awkward stares and some pictures taken of me. Essentially, this would be others treating me in a way that they would not want to be treated. What they are worried about the most is their privacy, but they would give no consideration to mine. Of course, I'm being general here, as people that want to remain private will ignore me, and people that have little concern about their privacy will have little concern about mine.

    It would be great if people on both sides could just be responsible and respectful Please, I don't want to be punched in the face or kicked in the balls because I'm wearing glass

  19. #39
    Registered User Kookork's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2011
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,325
    Images
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Ferk View Post
    I appreciate what you said.

    I just wonder if glass is what we should be most worried about. I understand that it's a new technology and we don't know what it will be capable of doing (or what other technologies will produce in the next few years). I've seen many videos on youtube that invade people's privacy, and that was before glass. You may consider glass less conspicuous, but I'd like to counter that. Many people use their phones to play games, use apps, or browse the web; there is no reason a person cannot pretend to be doing this as they are recording. And in case you are wondering what type of videos I'm watching on youtube, they are mostly prank videos. I do find them amusing, and I'm pretty confident that they get the people's permission to share after the prank. Also, I believe they have a guy hiding or trying to be incognito as he records; again, glass not needed.

    And if I were to get the glass, I have a feeling that I will get awkward stares and some pictures taken of me. Essentially, this would be others treating me in a way that they would not want to be treated. What they are worried about the most is their privacy, but they would give no consideration to mine. Of course, I'm being general here, as people that want to remain private will ignore me, and people that have little concern about their privacy will have little concern about mine.

    It would be great if people on both sides could just be responsible and respectful Please, I don't want to be punched in the face or kicked in the balls because I'm wearing glass
    You wont be punched or kicked or yelled at for wearing Google Glass. If I can be sure that private moments of mine won't be yours online without my permission and non private moments of mine is recorded with my knowledge then I personally have no issue and won't stare at you or ask about what the Google glass can do. You have your privacy as I have mine, no more or less.

  20. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Ferk View Post
    Please, I don't want to be punched in the face or kicked in the balls because I'm wearing glass
    You may kick yourself in the balls when the price goes down to a couple hundred bucks in a couple years.

    I met someone hiking Springer to Fontana a month ago who wore a video recorder on his head and was planning (I met him on day 1) to record every step. Thats going to be a boring video before edit. I mention this as no one (there were about 10 people at the shelter) expressed any concerns about this. The thought never crossed my mind as I talked to him. I do believe, however, that no one should be video taped without permission.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •