WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 49

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-10-2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    98

    Default "Stand Your Ground" Laws - Which states have them on the AT?

    Maybe I shouldn't be worried about this but does any one know which states have "Stand your ground" laws like Florida's? Does the AT go thru any of them?

    Are any other hikers worried about these laws, especially in Florida? I don't think I want to go hiking there next winter. Hiker entitlement seems to be a popular subject for these forums but maybe we should be worried. Or is it a racial thing?

    Just so you know, I'm not from the US, I get confused about US legal practices and would like to get some perspective.

  2. #2

    Default

    You're a victim of media frenzy on the Zimmerman case. I live in Florida, stand your ground laws are nothing to fear.

    The law didn't even play into the defense of Zimmerman, it was a straight up self defense case.

  3. #3
    Registered User Tuckahoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-26-2004
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,320
    Images
    52

    Default

    I fully expect this to be a troll thread to be nuked, however, I will answer this as respectfully and straight forward as I can.

    Now first and foremost, please understand exactly what "stand your ground laws" are and what it means. I know that they have been in the news lately, especially with cases like the Zimmerman trial. But there is an incredible amount of incorrect information and understanding, especially in the media driving an agenda. Stand your ground laws had nothing to do with the Zimmerman trial which was a straight up affirmative self defense case.

    Most every state has either statute (Florida) or through case law (Virginia) established SYG laws. See that? Nearly every state; infact probably the majority of AT states. What such laws establish is that an individual present in any location who has a legal right to be present, has NO duty to retreat from a threat of harm or death when confronted by an assailant. This is a most simple and basic conscept of human rights. That right to defend yourself with force if necessary and not to be a victim. This is such an old English standard of common law, that it has been enshrined in Virginia case law since the 17th century.

    Should a woman be tried for murder because she killed the man attempting to rape her, because she did not retreat from that trail shelter?
    Last edited by Tuckahoe; 07-17-2013 at 07:53.
    igne et ferrum est potentas
    "In the beginning, all America was Virginia." -​William Byrd

  4. #4
    Registered User moytoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-10-2009
    Location
    Titusville, Florida, United States
    Age
    76
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    And to answer your question poopsy. Yes several of the states along the AT have the laws in one form or another. You can google and get all the information you want.
    KK4VKZ -SOTA-SUMMITS ON THE AIR-
    SUPPORT LNT

  5. #5
    Registered User DeerPath's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-01-2011
    Location
    Dunedin, Florida, United States
    Age
    80
    Posts
    375
    Journal Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckahoe64 View Post
    I fully expect this to be a troll thread to be nuked, however, I will answer this as respectfully and straight forward as I can.

    Now first and foremost, please understand exactly what "stand your ground laws" are and what it means. I know that they have been in the news lately, especially with cases like the Zimmerman trial. But there is an incredible amount of incorrect information and understanding, especially in the media driving an agenda. Stand your ground laws had nothing to do with the Zimmerman trial which was a straight up affirmative self defense case.

    Most every state has either statute (Florida) or through case law (Virginia) established SYG laws. See that? Nearly every state; infact probably the majority of AT states. What such laws establish is that an individual present in any location who has a legal right to be present, has NO duty to retreat from a threat of harm or death when confronted by an assailant. This is a most simple and basic conscept of human rights. That right to defend yourself with force if necessary and not to be a victim. This is such an old English standard of common law, that it has been enshrined in Virginia case law since the 17th century.

    Should a woman be tried for murder because she killed the man attempting to rape her, because she did not retreat from that trail shelter?
    DITTO....... Very well said. Any State or Country that allows you to defend yourself from a perpetrator is the same as "stand your ground".
    Happy Trails
    DeerPath

    LIFE'S JOURNEY IS NOT TO ARRIVE AT THE GRAVE SAFELY
    IN A WELL PRESERVED BODY,
    BUT RATHER SKID IN SIDEWAYS, TOTALLY WORN OUT,
    SHOUTING "HOLY CRAP....WHAT A RIDE!"

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckahoe64 View Post

    What such laws establish is that an individual present in any location who has a legal right to be present, has NO duty to retreat from a threat of harm or death when confronted by an assailant.
    That's what I'm trying to say.

  7. #7
    Registered User moytoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-10-2009
    Location
    Titusville, Florida, United States
    Age
    76
    Posts
    1,971

    Default

    Have you read what the "stand your ground law" is?
    No you have nothing to fear unless you are the perpetrator.
    KK4VKZ -SOTA-SUMMITS ON THE AIR-
    SUPPORT LNT

  8. #8
    imscotty's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-13-2011
    Location
    North Reading, MA
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,271
    Images
    7

    Default

    Poopsy,

    I see that Canada has a number of news stories where citizens are sent to prison for defending their own life and property...

    http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/01...ked-attackers/

    I am so sorry to hear that good people in Canada have been prosicuted simply for defending themselves and their families against criminals. As long as you do not attack anyone along the AT, you will not have to worry about the 'Stand Your Ground' laws. I hope you come and enjoy this beautiful trail and its freedoms.

    Scott

  9. #9
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  10. #10

    Default

    If Trayvon were packin' there's a good chance he'd be alive today, and his killer would be the one in the ground.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-02-2013
    Location
    Pensacola, Florida
    Posts
    618

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    If Trayvon were packin' there's a good chance he'd be alive today, and his killer would be the one in the ground.
    If Trayvon kept his hands to himself, as we teach all kids, he would be alive today. Trayvon would be in prison for that. Why? He couldn't get a CCW permit until age 21, so he could not be legally packing.

  12. #12
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Nice way to start a flame war Sly. I can see you didn't watch the trial... Remember Trayvon sucker punched him knocked him to the ground beat his head on the concrete, first and Zimmerman yelled for help and there was an eye witness.

    Please remember the state run media is trying to make this into something its not.
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wise Old Owl View Post
    Nice way to start a flame war Sly. I can see you didn't watch the trial... Remember Trayvon sucker punched him knocked him to the ground beat his head on the concrete, first and Zimmerman yelled for help and there was an eye witness.
    .
    LOL... yeah right. Was that after Zimmerman hung up from 911 and chased him down?

    There may not be many here that when walking home and accosted by a stranger would act much differently. I'd certainly tell you to GTFO.

  14. #14
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    LOL... yeah right. Was that after Zimmerman hung up from 911 and chased him down?

    there isn't a law against following someone....Zimmerman lost him and returned to the car and was then confronted. Seriously Sly you are telling me if someone punched you broke your nose and knocked you to the ground you aren't going to defend yourself?
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wise Old Owl View Post
    there isn't a law against following someone....Zimmerman lost him and returned to the car and was then confronted. Seriously Sly you are telling me if someone punched you broke your nose and knocked you to the ground you aren't going to defend yourself?
    No, I'm saying if Trayvon was carrying a gun he'd still be alive.

    I wouldn't be out there running around getting my jollies like Zimmerman either.

  16. #16
    Registered User Tuckahoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-26-2004
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,320
    Images
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    LOL... yeah right. Was that after Zimmerman hung up from 911 and chased him down?
    Sly, dude, you are a moderator and should be setting the example. There is actually an attempt here to have a civil discussion and this does not help.

    WOO -- I figured that map would leave out Virginia. Our prinicple of SYG and castle doctrine is the result of a long history of case law, and there is little desire to enact through legislation what could end up being a weaker standard.
    igne et ferrum est potentas
    "In the beginning, all America was Virginia." -​William Byrd

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuckahoe64 View Post
    Sly, dude, you are a moderator and should be setting the example. There is actually an attempt here to have a civil discussion and this does not help.
    As am I. I can't help it if you don't agree.

    If this thread violates the no politics rule it should be deleted.

  18. #18
    I certainly was in the right.
    Join Date
    02-01-2010
    Location
    off line
    Posts
    174
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    LOL... yeah right. Was that after Zimmerman hung up from 911 and chased him down?

    There may not be many here that when walking home and accosted by a stranger would act much differently. I'd certainly tell you to GTFO.
    Chased

    Please add "embellished" to spin, emotion and falsehoods. Take any issue, from the designated hitter rule to passing bonds for new fill in the blank.

    One looses credibility (and the debate) with these tactics. We can agee that we disagree, but can we first agree on the facts, avoiding embellishments, spin, emotion and falsehoods?

    Take 9-11; only one flight stood their ground, which prevented additional deaths.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roche View Post
    Chased

    Please add "embellished" to spin, emotion and falsehoods. Take any issue, from the designated hitter rule to passing bonds for new fill in the blank.

    One looses credibility (and the debate) with these tactics. We can agee that we disagree, but can we first agree on the facts, avoiding embellishments, spin, emotion and falsehoods?

    Take 9-11; only one flight stood their ground, which prevented additional deaths.
    Speaking of embellishment...

    Raw: 911 call Zimmerman made to Sanford police (Explicit)


  20. #20
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post

    What is your point Sly?
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •