WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1

    Default Heet vs. denatured alcohol question?

    I am quite proud of myself as I have built a soda can alcohol stove and windscreen and pot lid combo all MYOG from household goods or very modest $ walllyworld kinda stuff. Probably $7 in all together including drinking the soda from stove fab.

    Consistently boiling or "hot enough" 2 cups of water on 3/4 ounce denatured alcohol which seems prettying impressive to me.

    Would I do even better with "Heet" that everyone seems to rave about?

  2. #2

    Default

    I don't like heet as the fumes are toxic. I don't know if it's more efficient than alcohol or not but I won't use it even if it is twice as efficient because of its toxicity.
    Enough is OK, too much is just right.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    05-05-2011
    Location
    state of confusion
    Posts
    9,866
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    No, and maybe.

    HEET is methanol. Methanol is toxic to humans, it can cause blindness if ingested. It has a lower heat of combustion than ethanol or denatured alcohol (methanol/ethanol blend).

    Methanol - 9800 btu/lb
    Ethanol - 12,800 btu/lb

    So methanol contains less energy when burned. People use it because it is conveniently available.

    However, that doesnt tell the whole story, because methanols vapor pressure is higher. Methanol vaporizes more readily, so it may burn faster in some alcohol stoves. Since stoves are a balance between heat input, and heat lost to environment from the pot, a faster burning stove, MAY be more efficient than a slower burning one. Not always, just a possibility. Where methanol is superior, is cold weather performance due to the higher vapor pressure. It lights and burns better in colder temps.

    So, again, no, and maybe.

    Personally, I like a 25% methanol/75% ethanol blend. Some small amt water in there. Basically SLX spiked with a little everclear.
    Last edited by MuddyWaters; 09-22-2013 at 20:57.

  4. #4
    Registered User Drybones's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-13-2010
    Location
    Gadsden, AL
    Age
    75
    Posts
    3,187

    Default

    I use Heet because: 1) I notice less odor 2) It seems to boil water faster 3) It's easy to find 4) Cheaper...$1.67/12 oz bottle.

  5. #5
    AT 11,000 Miler
    Join Date
    01-06-2003
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    403
    Images
    1

    Default

    I don't like heet as the fumes are toxic.
    Outdoorsman .... could you explain this? I've always heard that methanol burns very cleanly. More clean than a wood campfire.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MuddyWaters View Post
    No, and maybe.

    HEET is methanol. Methanol is toxic to humans, it can cause blindness if ingested. It has a lower heat of combustion than ethanol or denatured alcohol (methanol/ethanol blend).

    Methanol - 9800 btu/lb
    Ethanol - 12,800 btu/lb

    So methanol contains less energy when burned. People use it because it is conveniently available.

    However, that doesnt tell the whole story, because methanols vapor pressure is higher. Methanol vaporizes more readily, so it may burn faster in some alcohol stoves. Since stoves are a balance between heat input, and heat lost to environment from the pot, a faster burning stove, MAY be more efficient than a slower burning one. Not always, just a possibility. Where methanol is superior, is cold weather performance due to the higher vapor pressure. It lights and burns better in colder temps.

    So, again, no, and maybe.

    Personally, I like a 25% methanol/75% ethanol blend. Some small amt water in there. Basically SLX spiked with a little everclear.
    Thanks Muddy. I knew that there was someone who knew more than I do about the properties of these (flammable) liquids.
    Enough is OK, too much is just right.

  7. #7
    AT 11,000 Miler
    Join Date
    01-06-2003
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    Posts
    403
    Images
    1

    Default

    I don't like heet as the fumes are toxic.
    I'd like to know why you say the fumes are toxic. Wikipedia says that ... "Methanol burns in oxygen including open air, forming carbon dioxide and water."

  8. #8
    Registered User Raymond James's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-17-2012
    Location
    Rural Missouri
    Age
    64
    Posts
    41

    Default

    Both burn cleanly and unless burnt in a closed space do not pose a danger. Do not drink either one. I would use try and use HEET in late fall /winter/early spring but other wise use what you have/whichever is cheaper.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-17-2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    65
    Posts
    5,131

    Default

    The unburned fumes are toxic. Burning any fuel can also produce some toxic by-products of partially combusted fuel (carbon monoxide, e.g.), but because I'm using these outside (not in my tent or other enclosed space), I don't worry about using either.

  10. #10

    Default

    Burning any fuel can also produce some toxic by-products of partially combusted fuel (carbon monoxide, e.g.),.[/QUOTE]

    This made me think, HA I store my stove in my cookpot and usually just wipe it out with a bandanna before boiling water in case some sand or dirt got in it. I know lots of people store their stoves in their cookpot, so is there any chance of greasy leftover toxic whatever that should be washed out of the pot? Or should the stove be put in a plastic bag before storing in the cookpot?
    Or should I just go no-cook. Which I have tried and liked actually.

  11. #11
    Registered User FarmerChef's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2012
    Location
    Northwestern, VA (outside of Harper's Ferry)
    Posts
    1,800
    Images
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wannahike View Post
    Burning any fuel can also produce some toxic by-products of partially combusted fuel (carbon monoxide, e.g.),.

    This made me think, HA I store my stove in my cookpot and usually just wipe it out with a bandanna before boiling water in case some sand or dirt got in it. I know lots of people store their stoves in their cookpot, so is there any chance of greasy leftover toxic whatever that should be washed out of the pot? Or should the stove be put in a plastic bag before storing in the cookpot?
    Or should I just go no-cook. Which I have tried and liked actually.
    Nah. Just swish it out with a bit of water and/or wipe dry. Someone with more technical knowledge can correct me here but the thin film of evaporated methanol is not going to cause you any significant toxicity. No more than if you spilled some on your hands while lighting your stove and then ate your food with those bare hands after you wiped them off.
    2,000 miler. Still keepin' on keepin' on.

  12. #12
    Registered User dla's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-08-2004
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Carry a bottle of Jack Daniels. After you spill methanol on your hands, "medicate" yourself with a shot of Jack.

    In my experience, Heet lights easier in ultra-cold weather (dog sled mushers still use it). SLX is 50/50 ethanol/methanol and is the best stove fuel.

  13. #13
    Registered User quasarr's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-24-2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Age
    38
    Posts
    650

    Default

    I think thru hikers prefer HEET because it is easier to find in small towns, and can be bought in a 12 oz bottle instead of a quart. Price per oz is about the same as denatured alcohol. The difference in performance will only be noticed by a dedicated "stovie."

  14. #14
    GSMNP 900 Miler rmitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-13-2011
    Location
    Knoxville,Tn
    Age
    68
    Posts
    511
    Images
    4

    Default

    In the field I can't tell much difference in the output or burn time of HEET or denatured. At Wally World HEET in the yellow bottle is $1.77. That works out to less than 15 cents an oz., before tax. At the hardware store a gallon of SLX is $15. That works out to over 23 cents per oz.

  15. #15
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OutdoorsMan View Post
    I don't like heet as the fumes are toxic. I don't know if it's more efficient than alcohol or not but I won't use it even if it is twice as efficient because of its toxicity.
    Awkward and miss-informed... feel free to PM me but I have to ask where did you read this old wifes tale? Just Curious.

    Methanol burns in oxygen including open air, forming carbon dioxide and water:
    2 CH3OH + 3 O2 → 2 CO2 + 4 H2O
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  16. #16
    Registered User Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-29-2007
    Location
    High up in an old tree
    Posts
    14,444
    Journal Entries
    19
    Images
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Odd Man Out View Post
    The unburned fumes are toxic. Burning any fuel can also produce some toxic by-products of partially combusted fuel (carbon monoxide, e.g.), but because I'm using these outside (not in my tent or other enclosed space), I don't worry about using either.
    UH ok lets go down this thought process.. to my knowledge - Henry Ford created Kingsford which is coal dust and building material and guess what .. Pine scrap from the model A and T .. worst thing on the planet to cook with and propane ...well not much better... Kingsford was sold in the 1930's at the car dealerships... Folks we have been cooking for 100,000 years on natural wood fires... wood gas and Methanol? yea I WANT TO SEE THE SCIENCE! nobody died.


    Yes I want a good argument - for 5 cents... Lucy? you are up!
    http://science.discovery.com/tv-show...briquettes.htm




    5cp-logo.png please understand this is not personal its the INTERNET.
    Last edited by Wise Old Owl; 09-24-2013 at 22:48.
    Dogs are excellent judges of character, this fact goes a long way toward explaining why some people don't like being around them.

    Woo

  17. #17
    I hike, therefore I am.
    Join Date
    12-11-2003
    Location
    Maine Native
    Posts
    106
    Images
    93

    Default

    Heet burned more efficient for me (in a Trangia stove). Though it's hard to say because I'd mix and match denatured with Heet in my fuel bottle. Whichever was available along the way would end up in my fuel container. But I really got more burn time from straight Heet I think. I never hung my head over the stove and breathed in the fumes, so I can't speak on the poisonous gas or whatnot that some people have experienced with Heet. The fact is it cooked my meals without any sort of side effects whatsoever. I probably used it to cook at least 700 meals on trail with zero ill effects.

  18. #18
    Registered User dla's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-08-2004
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rmitchell View Post
    In the field I can't tell much difference in the output or burn time of HEET or denatured. At Wally World HEET in the yellow bottle is $1.77. That works out to less than 15 cents an oz., before tax. At the hardware store a gallon of SLX is $15. That works out to over 23 cents per oz.
    That should be 11.7 cents per ounce for a gallon of slx.

  19. #19
    GSMNP 900 Miler rmitchell's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-13-2011
    Location
    Knoxville,Tn
    Age
    68
    Posts
    511
    Images
    4

    Default

    Oops. MY bad, I was thinking 64 oz. but there is acutally 128 oz. in a gallon. You are correct dla.

  20. #20

    Default

    Good to know, TY!

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •