Quote Originally Posted by weary View Post
Your alleged "facts" are not "facts." When our attempts to get WHL to do the responsible thing failed, we turned the matter over to the National Park Service, ending the controversy as far as I'm concerned. It never was a matter of wilderness or the appearance of wilderness. Commercial businesses require a special use permit before erecting signs within the trail corridor. MATC is required report violations to the National Park Service, which we did. Problem solved.

Weary
Problem solved??? Pass the buck is "problem solved"? If someone at MATC spent as much time and effort working with WHL trying to get to "problem solved" as you have here, the "problem" just might be "solved"