WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-01-2014
    Location
    north atlanta, ga
    Posts
    17

    Default boots or trail runners?

    So I have a paid of Keen boots that I normally hike but I recently got a pair of new balance trail runners. Any thoughts on which would be better for a ga/bc section hike?

    The keens are comfy but heavy.

  2. #2

    Default

    Have you tried hiking in the trail runners yet? If they're comfortable on you, go for it. Nothing -wrong- with boots, but a lot of us have migrated over to lighter hiking footwear over the years without looking back.

  3. #3
    Hiker bigcranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2002
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Age
    62
    Posts
    7,937
    Images
    296

    Default

    It's really an individual decision. I switched over from big heavy boots to trail runners years ago (April of 2000, I remember the hike very clearly.) Trail runners are fine for the AT in the South for most people, but they are different and you'll need to try them out before committing to a long hike in them.

    The upsides for me are: much less fatigue, especially in my legs, and no blisters. Also, trail runners dry very quickly, so I don't worry about them getting wet. I do like wool socks with my trail runners.
    Ken B
    'Big Cranky'
    Our Long Trail journal

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-29-2006
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Age
    60
    Posts
    2,018

    Default

    Trail runners with a caveat: I own 3 different pairs of NB trail runners. I just got a pair of Leadville 1210s that I intend to take on my upcoming PCT hike. I also have a pair of much lighter ones (can't remember the model number) that I would never hike in with a full pack because they are too light, don't have Vibram soles, and the bottom of my feet would take a pounding.

    I'm currently wearing a pair of MO889s that I would take on a shorter hike where the trail is easier (no rocks, roots, etc) and my pack is fully loaded.
    Pain is a by-product of a good time.

  5. #5
    Section Hiker
    Join Date
    01-26-2013
    Location
    California
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    Boots for winter (slower, shorter, slogging in the snow/muck kinda hikes) and trail runners for summer. I am new to the trail runners but had them out with a full pack a couple weekends ago on an overnight. Very happy with them. The only issue I had was with them loosing up throughout the day and feet sliding in my shoes a little--just need to retie them periodically I think. I wear Asics Gel Scout trail runners.


    "Your comfort zone is a beautiful place, but nothing ever grows there.
    "


  6. #6
    Hopeful Hiker QHShowoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-16-2005
    Location
    There's no place like it
    Age
    49
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Whichever you're most comfortable with. There's nothing about the GA terrain that would require specialized footwear.
    you left to walk the appalachian trail
    you can feel your heart as smooth as a snail
    the mountains your darlings
    but better to love than have something to scale


    -Girlyman, "Hold It All At Bay"

  7. #7

    Default

    I use both and pretty much find them equal, very slight preference to trail runners.. But Im happy grabbing my boots or grabbing my New Balance. For me it comes down to when and where I'll be hiking. Try both and it won't take long to decide!

  8. #8
    Registered User kennajm's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-18-2009
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Age
    44
    Posts
    29

    Default

    I picked up some NB 810V3's last week and hiked in them over the weekend with a full pack.

    Pros: Dried quickly, no blisters, weigh nothing
    Cons: I definitely missed the thick sole of my Vasques. Some of the rocks underneath hurt a little

    I think I've switched over to the trail runner camp though. They were brand new when I hit the trail and I didn't have anything close to a hot spot, much less a blister. Can't say the same thing for my boots. However, I'd still use the boots for winter hiking.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QHShowoman View Post
    Whichever you're most comfortable with. There's nothing about the GA terrain that would require specialized footwear.
    To add to this sentiment I agree with, I used to hike in Asolo boots, but the fatigue got to me enough I went to a pair of solomon pro trail runners, which I do not regret, and also have put a couple of hundred trail miles in Maine, which is considerably more difficult in Terrain than GA. I typically hike with 30-ish lbs on trail runners.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigcranky View Post
    It's really an individual decision. I switched over from big heavy boots to trail runners years ago (April of 2000, I remember the hike very clearly.) Trail runners are fine for the AT in the South for most people, but they are different and you'll need to try them out before committing to a long hike in them.

    The upsides for me are: much less fatigue, especially in my legs, and no blisters. Also, trail runners dry very quickly, so I don't worry about them getting wet. I do like wool socks with my trail runners.
    +1 on still using wool sock with your trail runners. Last summer for my 4 week section on the AT I switched to trail runners and tried Under Armor running socks. The socks wore out pretty quick. I will stick with wool from now on.
    The road to glory cannot be followed with much baggage.
    Richard Ewell, CSA General


  11. #11
    GSMNP 900 Miler
    Join Date
    02-25-2007
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Age
    57
    Posts
    4,864
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    5

    Default

    I personally prefer boots... but that is because the bulk of my hiking is in GSMNP where there's lots of unbridged stream crossings. With a pair of water-proof boots, I can step in water upto about 5" deep without getting my feet wet. That depth combined with rock-hoping gets me across 80% of the unbridged stream crossings without having to stop and change into water shoes.

    By comparison, the AT stays more on ridges where there are fewer stream crossings. So I understand thru hikers that would prefer trail runners.

  12. #12

    Default

    I was reluctant to change from boots to trail runners and I did it in stages - boots to lightweight boots to "walking shoes" to running shoes. It's been just great - but - I did it in conjunction with lightening my pack load at the same time. My only regret was taking so long to make the change.
    Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.

  13. #13

    Default

    I've used trail runners for a couple years but had numerous instances where I was close to rolling my ankle. I've made a change to Merrell Proterra Mid Sport.
    It's practically a hybrid between a trail runner and a boot. It has the flexibility of a trail runner but still offers ankle protection. It also weighs less than a standard hiking book. So far, I've had no problems. They're a bit pricy but was well worth the investment.

    http://www.rei.com/product/856070/me...ing-shoes-mens

  14. #14
    Registered User joshuasdad's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-23-2008
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    662

    Default

    +1 on Solomon trail runners and wool socks in Georgia. I may need to move to some boots for New Hampshire next week, and am dreading the possible blisters, slower miles, etc...

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    07-21-2005
    Location
    Garner, NC
    Age
    58
    Posts
    649
    Images
    279

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by One More View Post
    So I have a paid of Keen boots that I normally hike but I recently got a pair of new balance trail runners. Any thoughts on which would be better for a ga/bc section hike?

    The keens are comfy but heavy.
    I expect you'll do fine in trail runners. I switched 3 years ago and haven't looked back. I now wear the same shoes to work as I wear on the trail. One less item to forget when packing.

    And GA / NC sections generally are not too rocky.

  16. #16

    Default

    Trail Runners: for higher mileage per day UL wt kit carrying hikes on established well maintained trail (like the AT section you're hiking, PCT, etc) when in that go go go thru-hiking mode AFTER having been been thoroughly physically strengthened and conditioned in my lower half(ankles, knees, legs, etc) AND hips, shoulders, and back AND IF I have no other physical issues(hip, back, joint, etc problems)

    Boots: NOT ALL boots are extremely heavy or cumbersome!. Some newer lighter wt boot models blur the lines sometimes resembling a mid cut light wt hiker/trail runner. Use for lower mileage days, carrying heavy loads(like in winter or extended backcountry trips), bushwacking, uneven rocky terrain(scree, talus, ridgelines bushwacking, some swamps, etc), especially when in the mountains at or above treeline.

  17. #17
    Registered User Andy P's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-25-2014
    Location
    Worcester, Massachusetts
    Age
    45
    Posts
    43

    Default

    I just recently switched from the asolo drifter gv to the asolo piuma. I love the drifter and I'm definitely keeping them for winter hikes, but the piuma seems to be better suited for a thru hike. The piuma's aren't waterproof, highly breathable and quick drying, have the ankle support I'm looking for and they're super light at under two pounds for the pair. I have had ankle problems in the past and these give me the confidence of a boot with the feel of a trail runner. A little pricey, but I'll definitely get my money's worth out of them.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-17-2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    64
    Posts
    5,131

    Default

    I'm liking my Keen Voyageurs (low top). So they are not really boots (low cut and well ventilated/not waterproof with mesh panels), but not really trail runners either. Best of both or worst of both, depending on your perspective. I wore them every day all winter (and we got 120 inches of snow and much below zero weather). I will need to replace them for summer hiking and have thought about trying some trail runners (been to a few stores to try some on). But I have a rather boney heel and need something with a deep heel cup. That and the generous toe box on the Keens will probably bring me back.

  19. #19

    Default

    With the average mile taking about 2,000 steps I say go lighter. I switched to New Balance MT1010 a year ago and never looked back. At 7oz per shoe compared to a boot at 1.5 pounds I am saving the need to lift 1,000 pounds per foot / mile.

    Good luck!
    Visit Backpacking Adventures and enter your pictures into our monthly contest!

    Check us out on YouTube or FaceBook


  20. #20

    Default

    waterproof boots for winter, light breathable trail runners for the summer.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •