Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25
  1. #1
    Registered User sleepwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-22-2006
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Age
    37
    Posts
    89
    Images
    2

    Question Boots or Trailrunners?

    I know this may be a point of contention, but I would like to hear your pros and cons. I'm a die-hard Asolo boot fan but recently I've been thinking about a switch to lighter trail runners for my hikes. Case in point I have a 2 week trip planned in April, Neel's Gap- North.

    I've been a little concerned about ankle support. I'm not too worried about waterproofness as I carry gaiters to make up for the shoe height. Also I was considering sole durability and traction. I hope some ultralighters would weigh in on this. Any info would be extremely helpful!

  2. #2
    Registered User betic4lyf's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-11-2005
    Location
    east side
    Age
    24
    Posts
    336

    Default

    my feet sweat more than life, and without my trail runners, i would sweat to death. also i don't like clunky things. as far as grip, trail runners havent let me down, and they erode the trail a lot less.




    Vin Diesel Can Divide By Zero

  3. #3
    Surveyor & cartographer wyclif's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-12-2006
    Location
    Wilmington, Delaware
    Posts
    170
    Images
    3

    Default

    When I was a teenager, I hiked in those stiff waffle-stompers like everyone else.

    I can't imagine hiking in 5lb boots now. It takes a toll on your knees and your back. If 'old-school' hikers wanna do that, fine with me.

    But I love hiking in the trail runners; I don't have ankle problems while climbing and with a +/-30# pack I've found that more ankle support than trail runners afford isn't necessary for me.

    I only went out for a walk and finally concluded to stay out till sundown, for going out, I found, was really going in.

    ~John Muir

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-07-2005
    Location
    Fontana Dam, NC
    Age
    34
    Posts
    150

    Default

    I think boots giving ankle support is bologna. Once I made the switch to trailrunners, I found that your ankles support your ankles not your boots. You just have to learn how to walk correctly on rocks and roots.

  5. #5
    Registered User Palmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-18-2004
    Location
    Hershey, Pennsylvania
    Age
    61
    Posts
    84

    Default

    I've switched over to trailrunners except when there's snow or I'm heading to a very wet area. I could probably use the trailrunners even then, but I gotta use my old boots sometime!

    My kids won't even consider boots.

  6. #6
    Livin' life in the drive thru! hikerjohnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-18-2004
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,150
    Images
    13

    Default

    I used Trail Runners last summer on my thru attempt - after 100 miles they were toast. I switched to lite hikers - and my current pair has about 200 miles on them and are in great shape! Look at these. Heavier duty than runners but much lighter than boots.
    So be it.
    --John

  7. #7
    Beer First! Member Alligator's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-02-2003
    Location
    Channel A
    Posts
    9,709
    Images
    79

    Default

    I switched from boots to trail runners for three season backpacking. I had really bad blister problems even after being professionally fit. I no longer have any blister problems and the trail runners weren't even fitted. They do make Gore-tex trail runners, although I don't think it is at all necessary except maybe in early spring or late fall. A pair of Sealskinz is another option. Traction is very good, but the soles tend to be more supple and you can feel the rocks more. It's not a big deal though at all.

    Pay close attention to the listed weights. I have seen some heavy pairs of trail runners out there.
    "Sleepy alligator in the noonday sun
    Sleepin by the river just like he usually done
    Call for his whisky
    He can call for his tea
    Call all he wanta but he can't call me..."
    Robert Hunter & Ron McKernan

  8. #8
    Registered User sleepwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-22-2006
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Age
    37
    Posts
    89
    Images
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hikerjohnd
    I used Trail Runners last summer on my thru attempt - after 100 miles they were toast. I switched to lite hikers - and my current pair has about 200 miles on them and are in great shape! Look at these. Heavier duty than runners but much lighter than boots.
    My buddy at work wears merrell continuum boots that he bought especially for our work environment(we're custom home framers in the north east)and he has had nothing good to say about them, he reports wet feet daily, although he says his feet sweat badly. I assume you are happy with these merrells, something to consider as my feet don't sweat too much.

    Those of you who recommend trailrunners...what brand would you endorse and how many miles do you put on them in an average outing? Also, I'm wondering about blistering and how it compares with conventional hiking boots(given a breaking in period). Thanks all and keep the comments coming...It is much appreciated!

  9. #9
    Surveyor & cartographer wyclif's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-12-2006
    Location
    Wilmington, Delaware
    Posts
    170
    Images
    3

    Default trailrunners don't last as long

    Quote Originally Posted by hikerjohnd
    I used Trail Runners last summer on my thru attempt - after 100 miles they were toast.
    You do tradeoff weight for durability in one sense--I have never heard of a thru-hiker on trailrunners not going through at least 4 pair--but still, I was surprised at the difference when I switched to the runners. The difference those few pounds make every step is a tradeoff I'd make any day...even if I had to budget more for shoes.

    I only went out for a walk and finally concluded to stay out till sundown, for going out, I found, was really going in.

    ~John Muir

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sleepwalker
    My buddy at work wears merrell continuum boots that he bought especially for our work environment(we're custom home framers in the north east)and he has had nothing good to say about them, he reports wet feet daily, although he says his feet sweat badly. I assume you are happy with these merrells, something to consider as my feet don't sweat too much.

    Those of you who recommend trailrunners...what brand would you endorse and how many miles do you put on them in an average outing? Also, I'm wondering about blistering and how it compares with conventional hiking boots(given a breaking in period). Thanks all and keep the comments coming...It is much appreciated!
    New Balance or Dunhills.

  11. #11
    ...Or is it Hiker Trash? Almost There's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-01-2005
    Location
    Woodstock, GA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,338
    Images
    17

    Default

    Goretex is sorta an overkill as in trailrunners it will get clogged with dirt and dust, this in effect negates the goretex. I have been researching as I am looking to make a change to trailrunners. Montrail Hardrocks get good reviews from people, and you can get them in regular and wide sizes. Salomons also get good marks from people I have talked to. Rounding it out I know of many on the PCT that have used some kind of New Balance. In the end you have to try out something and see if it works for you.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-24-2005
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    Age
    61
    Posts
    356

    Default

    I've used both boots and trailrunners and will always use boots now. After my 2001 thru was cut short in NY because of severly sprained ankle. Over the ankle boots are a requirement now with ankle supports unter them.

  13. #13

    Default

    I would love to try some of the new shoes or trail runners. I am strictly a boot hiker and I love the fact I can wade in ankle deep water/mud without getting my feet wet. I guess you could wear gaiters with the shoes to at least keep out dirt/ect. when wearing shorts, which is what I always do except in the coldest of temps. I would recommend whatever you wear do it months or even years before a thru-hike to test things out and get them broke in, maybe do a few more pairs if you can, for backup.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-22-2004
    Location
    Smyrna, Georgia
    Age
    34
    Posts
    296
    Images
    12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Almost There
    Goretex is sorta an overkill as in trailrunners it will get clogged with dirt and dust, this in effect negates the goretex. I have been researching as I am looking to make a change to trailrunners. Montrail Hardrocks get good reviews from people, and you can get them in regular and wide sizes. Salomons also get good marks from people I have talked to. Rounding it out I know of many on the PCT that have used some kind of New Balance. In the end you have to try out something and see if it works for you.
    Trail runners are great. However, Salomon's are notorious for having weak shoe laces. If going with Salomon's, get the ones with the regular shoe lace, not the thin ones with the slide lock - they're a joke. They broke on me before I got out of the 100 mile wilderness...

    I will say this: If you plan on hitting abunch of snow, go with a gore tex boot and gaitors. My wife and I hit a lot of snow in the Smokies and our feet were punished. Our trail runners were not waterproof hence our feet were popcicles.

  15. #15
    Registered User general's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-21-2005
    Location
    mossy creek, ga
    Age
    38
    Posts
    900
    Images
    1

    Default

    i broke my ancle wearing montrail's moraine AT's (heavyweights), and in turn learned a very important lesson. the stability of the foot bed (of the boot/shoe) is more helpful in gaining ancle support than having boots that cover your ancle. in general. trail runners provide a wider more flexable foot bed, which allows your foot to naturally adapt to the terrain that your walking on. that being said, i stil wear mid/light weight solomon boots that have a foot bed and sole much like a trail runner but also provide higher coverage for all of the reasons that i like boots.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khaynie
    ..... My wife and I hit a lot of snow in the Smokies and our feet were punished. Our trail runners were not waterproof hence our feet were popcicles.
    In my previous post I said I would like to try some trail runners, you've reminded me how I hate cold feet. So to my previous post I say NEVER MIND.

  17. #17
    Gray Blazer's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-11-2005
    Location
    Gainesville, Florida
    Age
    58
    Posts
    6,639
    Images
    96

    Default

    Do they make trailrunners with air-cushions in the heel?

  18. #18
    ...Or is it Hiker Trash? Almost There's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-01-2005
    Location
    Woodstock, GA
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,338
    Images
    17

    Default

    Gills,

    I agree with you about the slide lock salomons. I have my nice Asolo boots for winter/snow hiking conditions. The trailrunners for me are for warmer weather. Between November and March I hike in boots...for the most part. AFter that I want something lighter as I switch to my lighter pack. Yeah, it would suck to hike through snow in trailrunners.

  19. #19

    Default

    I myself started out with the cloddhoppers and always wore them growing up. No way No how would I ever wear em again.

  20. #20

    Default

    knee and ankle problems have always been directly connected to the total weight above them...therefore, if the problem exists you might consider stopping the potato life before hiking. Perhaps barefoot is best.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •