I sure hope ya'll aren't getting annoyed at these questions. I really value your opinions.
Here's my idea. My wife and I want to hike alot of the AT this year, at least till July. I have a nice RV. I don't care to spend alot of money on hostels or hotels. So I was thinking:
Hike 2-3 days, then turn around and hike back. Move the RV (after spending a night there). Hike 2-3 days and back again. If I do it correctly after I move the RV, I can hike south for 2-3 days - reverse course (that would put me at my starting point). Then hike North - reverse again. This way I'm only moving the RV every 6-8 days.
I know I won't be able to do the whole trail; but I am retired and being in a hurry doesn't interest me again. I am finding that when you reverse course, the trail looks completely different - must be gettin old.
This would eliminate the problem of having to get back to my car or RV after hiking for longer periods.
Does it sound logical, or am I off my nut? Has anyone tried something similar before?
Sorry for the long rant and dumb q's.
bob




Reply With Quote
All this for a negotiable fee!

Have your wife drop you at a trailhead. You start hiking north. Your wife drives to the next trailhead 12 to 15 miles up the trail. Parks the RV and starts hiking south with the keys in her pack. About noon you meet, she gives you the keys and after lunch keeps going south to the starting point. You proceed north and when you get to the RV you either have the option of driving back to the trailhead and picking up your wife and do the same thing the next day, or, leave your wife a day's walk away, go to the nearest town, pick up a bimbo and drive your RV to Vegas for a really great summer. If you choose option two, and you can anywhere along the trail if you get sick of hiking, Circus-Circus has a great RV park in Vegas and has very reasonable prices.
