Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 160 of 245
  1. #141
    Registered User Panzer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-06-2005
    Location
    Bucks County, PA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,623
    Images
    11

    Default

    He and others who have helped rescue lost hikers tell stories of people venturing deep into the mountains without compasses or maps.
    They apparently think little of hikers that don't have a compass or map.

    Panzer

  2. #142
    Registered User Plodderman's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-14-2008
    Location
    Wheelersburg, Ohio
    Age
    53
    Posts
    610

    Default

    Personal responsibility is a must and I hope to not put anyone elses life on the line because of my negligence.

  3. #143
    Registered User Panzer1's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-06-2005
    Location
    Bucks County, PA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,623
    Images
    11

    Default

    They wonder where the negligence line would be drawn; would someone hiking in jeans or with old equipment be considered negligent?
    I think this is a good point. Even people here on this list cannot agree on what equiptment/clothing to bring on the AT. example, many here do not feel a map or compass is necessary.

    Panzer

  4. #144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoidfu2

    Jail time
    Where did that come from?

    Quote Originally Posted by zoidfu2 View Post
    The severity? You mean 40 "billable" offenses(according the original OP) out of 140? Let me know when they're shelling out more cash than they're taking in from tourism
    Not much into personal responsibility are you? It's not up to the state to CYA and bail you out for free, especially if it's negligent when venturing into the woods.

    The new law isn't about fines as much as collecting for them. You don't pay you have your license suspended until you do. It's similar to click it, or ticket. Try not paying a road fine.

  5. #145
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-27-2005
    Location
    Berks County, PA
    Age
    51
    Posts
    7,159
    Images
    13

    Default

    Fortunately, it isn't up to WhiteBlaze. Rather it is an issue for residents of New Hampshire to decide. They have determined how they wish to handle it and who they wish to make determinations regarding negligence. It would appear they wish for these decisions to be made by people in the field who are closest to the issue and thus have the best vantage point.

    I would note that Panzer makes a strong case for referring people to hikeSafe.com.

  6. #146

  7. #147
    dirtbagger johnnybgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-28-2007
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,992
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAK View Post
    The problem is, we encourage reckless consumers, not competent citizens.
    Hit the proverbial nail on the head.
    Think OUTSIDE....no box required.

  8. #148

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAK View Post
    The problem is, we encourage reckless consumers, not competent citizens.
    Quote Originally Posted by johnnybgood View Post
    Hit the proverbial nail on the head.
    Who's we and how do they do it?

    Nearly every trail head has warnings about the dangers of hiking unprepared. You can lead a horse to water....

  9. #149
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-27-2005
    Location
    Berks County, PA
    Age
    51
    Posts
    7,159
    Images
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    Who are you talking to there Shades of Gray?
    General observation directed at anyone monitoring the thread, particularly opinionated non-residents. I've seen similar threads before. Someone posts something FYI and others take issue with it as if debating a contested issue not already decided.

  10. #150
    Registered User FatMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-28-2004
    Location
    Grassy Gap - AT
    Age
    55
    Posts
    946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shades of Gray View Post
    Fortunately, it isn't up to WhiteBlaze. Rather it is an issue for residents of New Hampshire to decide. They have determined how they wish to handle it and who they wish to make determinations regarding negligence on their behalf. It would appear they wish for these decisions made by people in the field who are closest to the issue who have the best vantage point.
    Exactly! Now stop talking sense. You know how that is frowned upon here at WB.

  11. #151
    dirtbagger johnnybgood's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-28-2007
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,992
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    Who's we and how do they do it?

    Nearly every trail head has warnings about the dangers of hiking unprepared. You can lead a horse to water....
    we= taxpayers bailout=we the taxpayers.
    Think OUTSIDE....no box required.

  12. #152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shades of Gray View Post
    General observation directed at anyone monitoring the thread, particularly opinionated non-residents. I've seen similar threads before. Someone posts something FYI and others take issue with it as if debating a contested issue not already decided.
    Ah, OK. I'm of the opinion there's nothing wrong with the new law.

  13. #153
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-27-2005
    Location
    Berks County, PA
    Age
    51
    Posts
    7,159
    Images
    13

    Default

    It would still apply to you even if you thought it objectionable.

  14. #154

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shades of Gray View Post
    It would still apply to you even if you thought it objectionable.
    LOL.. I find lots of laws objectionable, just not this one.

  15. #155
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-28-2004
    Location
    New Brunswick
    Age
    50
    Posts
    10,986

    Default

    "This is confirmed by what happens in states; for legislators make the citizens good by forming habits in them, and this is the wish of every legislator, and those who do not effect it miss their mark, and it is in this that a good constitution differs from a bad one."

    - Aristotle

  16. #156
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-14-2006
    Location
    The wilds of Maine
    Posts
    2,982

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoidfu2 View Post
    The severity? You mean 40 "billable" offenses(according the original OP) out of 140? Let me know when they're shelling out more cash than they're taking in from tourism
    I don't have to let you know nothing
    WALK ON

  17. #157
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    4,432
    Images
    1

    Default

    The take away message of all this is may be just this simple:

    If you are short on cash and tend to have a "worrier" back home, be sure to tell her not to call the Mounties until you are at least 5 days past due. Or just tell her that you will coming home a few days after you really plan to.

    Problem solved.

    RickB

    (Who is happy to pay NH's 8 percent lodging tax to avoid tenting in the winter)

  18. #158
    Registered User KG4FAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-31-2006
    Location
    Upstate SC
    Age
    29
    Posts
    935
    Images
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    Nearly every trail head has warnings about the dangers of hiking unprepared. You can lead a horse to water....
    and fast food restaurants have to warn you that your coffee is going to be hot so they don't get sued. Putting a warning up at a trail head these days is just looks like a liability thing.

  19. #159

    Join Date
    01-22-2007
    Location
    Middletown, Pennsylvania
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sly View Post
    Where did that come from?



    Not much into personal responsibility are you? It's not up to the state to CYA and bail you out for free, especially if it's negligent when venturing into the woods.

    The new law isn't about fines as much as collecting for them. You don't pay you have your license suspended until you do. It's similar to click it, or ticket. Try not paying a road fine.
    Woodsy said people should do jail time in addition to paying the money. Not much into reading a thread, are you?

    As long as you're attracting people to the mountains(that you regulate and make money off of) and letting them in, then yes, you are liable for bailing them out.

    The solution here is- Have something like a hiker safety course and certification that you must complete before you're allowed to go into the Whites.... but that's only if you're serious about keeping idiots off the mountain... which you aren't, because that would cost you tourism dollars.

  20. #160

    Join Date
    01-22-2007
    Location
    Middletown, Pennsylvania
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,554

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shades of Gray View Post
    General observation directed at anyone monitoring the thread, particularly opinionated non-residents. I've seen similar threads before. Someone posts something FYI and others take issue with it as if debating a contested issue not already decided.
    It's an internet forum where we're kicking around ideas and having a grand time doing so. So what?

Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •