Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21

    Default

    I think what John said was spot on.

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-12-2005
    Location
    Atlantic Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,235
    Images
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dog View Post
    That is a mean spirited statement John. I do not blame anyone for filing a missing person's report when they believe it is necessary.
    Not mean spirited, just a fact; I guess you can call it an "Inconvenient truth"


    This is just from one city, but is played out across the country. http://charmeck.org/city/charlotte/C...ages/Home.aspx


    Excerpts:

    Missing Persons



    The Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Missing Persons Unit
    • Receives more than 3,500 missing persons reports annually.
    • Approximately 70% of those reports involve juveniles between the age of 13 and 17 which also constitute the largest number of habitual runaways.
    • Adults account for the other 30%.
    • On the average in any given year less than 10 reports truly involve foul play.
    • The Unit is currently staffed by five detectives, one investigative technician and one supervisor.


    Look at the manning level at the bottom of the list. They just simply have to put many cases on a low priority, hopefully they pick the correct ones, but the more reports they receive the more chances they are going to make mistakes. There are some that say we should cough up money to increase the manning of the missing person unit, but why waste the money on this when less than 10 reports involve foul play. Increasing the manning, i.e., spending more money in this area is rewarding bad behavior and would be a complete waste of funds, something everyone is needing more of.


    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Dog View Post
    I for one would rather have the police resources used trying to find a person's loved one and foregoing giving a traffic ticket if they had to make a choice.
    That sounds nice on paper and is very touchy/feely, but it's completely naive.
    "The aim of science is to make difficult things understandable in a simpler way; the aim of poetry is to state simple things in an incomprehensible way. The two are incompatible."
    -- Paul Dirac

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •