Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6
Results 101 to 105 of 105
  1. #101
    rocketsocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-03-2011
    Location
    Group "W" Bench
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,406
    Journal Entries
    15
    Images
    39

    Default

    I did not know that the trails intent was not to be hiked in one attempt,herd someone else say that the other day too,maybe Lone Wolf? interesting.

  2. #102
    Registered User Penn-J's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-17-2007
    Location
    collegeville,PA
    Age
    36
    Posts
    85
    Images
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WIAPilot View Post
    Wow. So you started with $4000? I agree that the trail is so much about what you enjoy along the way and the friends that you make and share good times with. But I think this also gives an indication of just how expensive things are getting out there.
    Yeah, I agree. California is expensive! The whole damn country is expensive.
    "The wind that blows, is all that anybody knows"
    Thoreau

    .


  3. #103
    Registered User Kibble n Bit's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-01-2012
    Location
    Arkansas
    Age
    41
    Posts
    26
    Images
    5

    Default

    Which direction are you Goin' sublimety.. NOBO or SOBO
    Kibble's n Bit's

  4. #104
    OzJacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-11-2010
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Age
    57
    Posts
    2,959
    Images
    22

    Default

    This is a good thread with some interesting entries. Without any certainty that I am in anyway right I'll throw in a couple of thoughts.
    I am still to set foot on AT but hope to thru in 2013. I do claim some cred as a hiker in that I thruhiked my local track (Bibbulmun) in 2011 and have done many section hikes on it as well. It is 600miles and I did it in 36 days - it's on TrailJournals.com and YouTube.

    Section hiking and thru hiking are different mindsets. I read somewhere on WB recently that section hikers enjoy their hiking more and I think there is a lot of merit to that statement. When I section hike I just go out and enjoy myself. I carry more "goodies", take more photos, don't stress and relish the experience.
    When I did my thru I had a goal and each day was a step towards it. I still "enjoyed" the hike but I pushed through pain and weather far more than on a section hike.
    There was always that goal and while I still looked at sunrises and sunsets, marvelled at views and treasured some moments such as wildlife encounters they were inconsequential to my goal and I would have done the hike without them.
    When you set yourself to do a thruhike it is the accomplishment you seek, not the journey. Your attitude may (will) change during the hike and this can make not finishing easier but if it doesn't not finishing can leave a feeling of failure.
    Personally I love both and get differing satisfaction from both.
    Re old and young hikers, I suspect young hikers have a greater % fail due to finances and older hikers for injury. (Not rocket science that one) :-)
    When I come to Springer in March 2013 I will be looking to thru hike (on MY standards of pure), and to experience the social side of the AT that makes it unique.
    In 2014 I am tentatively going to do the Camino de Santiago with my wife and will treat that one more like a section hike (very grey for purity as befits my heathenism).

  5. #105

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OzJacko View Post
    This is a good thread with some interesting entries. Without any certainty that I am in anyway right I'll throw in a couple of thoughts.
    I am still to set foot on AT but hope to thru in 2013. I do claim some cred as a hiker in that I thruhiked my local track (Bibbulmun) in 2011 and have done many section hikes on it as well. It is 600miles and I did it in 36 days - it's on TrailJournals.com and YouTube.

    Section hiking and thru hiking are different mindsets. I read somewhere on WB recently that section hikers enjoy their hiking more and I think there is a lot of merit to that statement. When I section hike I just go out and enjoy myself. I carry more "goodies", take more photos, don't stress and relish the experience.
    When I did my thru I had a goal and each day was a step towards it. I still "enjoyed" the hike but I pushed through pain and weather far more than on a section hike.
    There was always that goal and while I still looked at sunrises and sunsets, marvelled at views and treasured some moments such as wildlife encounters they were inconsequential to my goal and I would have done the hike without them.
    When you set yourself to do a thruhike it is the accomplishment you seek, not the journey. Your attitude may (will) change during the hike and this can make not finishing easier but if it doesn't not finishing can leave a feeling of failure.
    Personally I love both and get differing satisfaction from both.
    Re old and young hikers, I suspect young hikers have a greater % fail due to finances and older hikers for injury. (Not rocket science that one) :-)
    When I come to Springer in March 2013 I will be looking to thru hike (on MY standards of pure), and to experience the social side of the AT that makes it unique.
    In 2014 I am tentatively going to do the Camino de Santiago with my wife and will treat that one more like a section hike (very grey for purity as befits my heathenism).
    Excellently stated! Really enjoyed reading this!!

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •