WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. #1
    Registered User xrayextra's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2013
    Location
    Metairie, Louisiana
    Age
    64
    Posts
    52

    Default If you want to lose weight on the trail take vitamin C

    Hi everyone! I thru-hiked last year and lost 65 lbs (233 lbs to 168 lbs).

    About a month prior to my trip I began to supplement my diet with 1000 mg of Vitamin C daily (the body can't process more than 1000 mg per day). I continued this on my AT hike.

    I learned later that Vitamin C helps convert fat to energy. Although I went from basically couch potatoe straight to the trail, I attribute the rapid weight loss to the assist from Vitamin C.

    I know I still would have lost weight but vitamin C helped speed up the process. I dropped 30 by the time I hit Pearisburg, 40 lbs by Harper's Ferry, and 55 by Delaware Water Gap.

    I also recommend taking glucosamine, an amino acid, for your knees and joints (although I didn't take it on the trail I wish I had; I'm taking it now).

    One other thing you need to be aware of. If your sweat begins to smell like amonia, it means you're burning muscle; you've run out of fat to burn so pile on the carbs!

    Good luck hikers!
    Flatfoot
    AT 2013, GA->ME
    PCT 2017, Mexico->Canada

  2. #2
    Registered User 1234's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-2004
    Location
    Chesapeake Va
    Age
    68
    Posts
    382
    Images
    1

    Default

    That's good info! thanks

  3. #3
    Registered User kayak karl's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-21-2007
    Location
    Swedesboro, NJ
    Age
    68
    Posts
    5,339
    Images
    25

    Default

    i lose 50lbs from Springer to Hurricane Shelter (550 miles) with no vitaimins. how do you know you lost it faster? was there a placebo hiker?
    congrads on weight lose
    I'm so confused, I'm not sure if I lost my horse or found a rope.

  4. #4

    Default

    Hi Xrayextra
    Welcome to Whiteblaze and congratulations on your thruhike. You have got to be the youngest thruhiker ever only being a 1 year old. Are you a baby elephant? Congratulations on the weight loss but 233 lbs. or even 168 lbs. for a one year old is ridiculous. Your poor Mama.
    You say you went from couch potato to the trail, don't you mean crib potato?
    Glucosamine for your knees? Really is this necessary, your knees and joints are brand new. Did you crawl the AT?
    Next time, you smell ammonia... check your diaper.

  5. #5
    CDT - 2013, PCT - 2009, AT - 1300 miles done burger's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-03-2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,437

    Default

    Lack of vitamin C makes it harder to metabolize fat and lose weight. But if you get an adequate amount of vitamin C (which almost everybody does nowadays--have you or anyone you know ever gotten scurvy?), I could not find any evidence that extra vitamin C does will promote weight loss.

    How much vitamin C do you need? 1 Clif bar gets you 90% of the way there. A bit of dried fruit on top of that would put you over the top. Don't bother taking supplements if you get enough. The extra goes right out through your kidneys and bladder.

  6. #6
    Wanna-be hiker trash
    Join Date
    03-05-2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    6,922
    Images
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trail Ponderer View Post
    Hi Xrayextra
    Welcome to Whiteblaze and congratulations on your thruhike. You have got to be the youngest thruhiker ever only being a 1 year old. Are you a baby elephant? Congratulations on the weight loss but 233 lbs. or even 168 lbs. for a one year old is ridiculous. Your poor Mama.
    You say you went from couch potato to the trail, don't you mean crib potato?
    Glucosamine for your knees? Really is this necessary, your knees and joints are brand new. Did you crawl the AT?
    Next time, you smell ammonia... check your diaper.
    There was glitch a while back where most new members showed up as being a single digit age. Not sure whatever came of it.
    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

  7. #7

    Default

    Thanks, Elf. I didn't know. No, more jokin with the kids.

  8. #8
    Wanna-be hiker trash
    Join Date
    03-05-2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    6,922
    Images
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trail Ponderer View Post
    Thanks, Elf. I didn't know. No, more jokin with the kids.
    No worries. A while back there was a member who's age had defaulted to 8 and until they got that fixed I honestly thought it was a kid asking questions about the trail.
    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

  9. #9
    Registered User xrayextra's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2013
    Location
    Metairie, Louisiana
    Age
    64
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kayak karl View Post
    how do you know you lost it faster?
    One of the hikers I met on the trail was a nutritionist and told me that it sped up the weight loss process by converting the fat to energy faster than if I hadn't taken vitamin c supplements.
    Flatfoot
    AT 2013, GA->ME
    PCT 2017, Mexico->Canada

  10. #10
    Registered User xrayextra's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2013
    Location
    Metairie, Louisiana
    Age
    64
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trail Ponderer View Post
    You have got to be the youngest thruhiker ever only being a 1 year old.
    If you must know I'm 54 yrs old. There is no way to change the birth date other than notifying the powers that be. It isn't worth the trouble. Go ahead and mock me all you want. It takes more than that to rustle my jimmies.
    Flatfoot
    AT 2013, GA->ME
    PCT 2017, Mexico->Canada

  11. #11

    Default

    I lost 50lbs by Damascus and then settled out. I did NOT take near the amount of Vit C as you.

    Furthermore, if you look thru threads asking how much weight one lost on a thru-hike you'll see losing big weight on a thru-hike is the norm.


    This is a very interesting article on supplements and it talks very specifically on Vit C. It's a long article, but it does give one insight on how vitamins became fadish. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...ements/277947/


    Excerpt:

    "...A man who was so spectacularly right that he won two Nobel Prizes and so spectacularly wrong that he was arguably the world's greatest quack.


    In 1931, Linus Pauling published a paper in the Journal of the American Chemical Society titled "The Nature of the Chemical Bond."Before publication, chemists knew of two types of chemicalbonds: ionic, where one atom gives up an electron to another; and covalent, where atoms share electrons. Pauling argued thatit wasn't that simple -- electron sharing was somewhere between ionic and covalent. Pauling's idea revolutionized the field, marrying quantum physics with chemistry. His concept was so revolutionary in fact that when the journal editor received the manuscript, he couldn't find anyone qualified to review it. When Albert Einstein was asked what he thought of Pauling's work, he shrugged his shoulders. "It was too complicated for me," he said. For this single paper, Pauling received the Langmuir Prize as the most outstanding young chemist in the United States, became the youngest person elected to the National Academy of Sciences, was made a full professor at Caltech, and won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. He was 30 years old.

    In 1949, Pauling published a paper in Science titled "Sickle Cell Anemia, a Molecular Disease." At the time, scientists knew that hemoglobin (the protein in blood that transports oxygen) crystallized in the veins of people with sickle-cell anemia, causing joint pain, blood clots, and death. But they didn't know why. Pauling was the first to show that sickle hemoglobin had a slightly different electrical charge--a quality that dramatically affected how the hemoglobin reacted with oxygen. His finding gave birth to the field of molecular biology.

    In 1951, Pauling published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences titled "The Structure of Proteins."

    Scientists knew that proteins were composed of a series of amino acids. Pauling proposed that proteins also had a secondary structure determined by how they folded upon themselves. He called one configuration the alpha helix--later used by James Watson and Francis Crick to explain the structure of DNA.


    In 1961, Pauling collected blood from gorillas, chimpanzees, and monkeys at the San Diego Zoo. He wanted to see whether mutations in hemoglobin could be used as a kind of evolutionary clock. Pauling showed that humans had diverged from gorillas about 11 million years ago, much earlier than scientists had suspected. A colleague later remarked, "At one stroke he united the fields of paleontology, evolutionary biology, and molecular biology."

    Pauling's accomplishments weren't limited to science. Beginning in the 1950s--and for the next forty years -- he was the world's most recognized peace activist. Pauling opposed the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, declined Robert Oppenheimer's offer to work on the Manhattan Project, stood up to Senator Joseph McCarthy by refusing a loyalty oath, opposed nuclear proliferation, publicly debated nuclear-arms hawks like Edward Teller, forced the government to admit that nuclear explosions could damage human genes, convinced other Nobel Prize winners to oppose the Vietnam War, and wrote the best-selling book No More War! Pauling's efforts led to the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. In 1962, he won the Nobel Peace Prize--the first person ever to win two unshared Nobel Prizes.

    In addition to his election to the National Academy of Sciences, two Nobel Prizes, the National Medal of Science, and the Medal for Merit (which was awarded by the president of the United States), Pauling received honorary degrees from Cambridge University, the University of London, and the University of Paris. In 1961, he appeared on the cover of Time magazine's Men of the Year issue, hailed as one of the greatest scientists who had ever lived.

    Then all the rigor, hard work, and hard thinking that had made Linus Pauling a legend disappeared. In the words of a colleague, his "fall was as great as any classic tragedy."


    The turning point came in March 1966, when Pauling was 65 years old. He had just received the Carl Neuberg Medal. "During a talk in New York City," recalled Pauling, "I mentioned how much pleasure I took in reading about the discoveries made by scientists in their various investigations of the nature of the world, and stated that I hoped I could live another twenty-five years in order to continue to have this pleasure. On my return to California I received a letter from a biochemist, Irwin Stone, who had been at the talk. He wrote that if I followed his recommendation of taking 3,000 milligrams of vitamin C, I would live not only 25 years longer, but probably more." Stone, who referred to himself as Dr. Stone, had spent two years studying chemistry in college. Later, he received an honorary degree from the Los Angeles College of Chiropractic and a "PhD" from Donsbach University, a non-accredited correspondence school in Southern California.

    Pauling followed Stone's advice. "I began to feel livelier and healthier," he said. "In particular, the severe colds I had suffered several times a year all my life no longer occurred. After a few years, I increased my intake of vitamin C to ten times, then twenty times, and then three hundred times the RDA: now 18,000 milligrams per day."

    From that day forward, people would remember Linus Pauling for one thing: vitamin C.

    In 1970, Pauling published Vitamin C and the Common Cold, urging the public to take 3,000 milligrams of vitamin C every day (about 50 times the recommended daily allowance). Pauling believed that the common cold would soon be a historical footnote. "It will take decades to eradicate the common cold completely," he wrote, "but it can, I believe, be controlled entirely in the United States and some other countries within a few years. I look forward to witnessing this step toward a better world." Pauling's book became an instant best seller. Paperback versions were printed in 1971 and 1973, and an expanded edition titled Vitamin C, the Common Cold and the Flu, published three years later, promised to ward off a predicted swine flu pandemic. Sales of vitamin C doubled, tripled, and quadrupled. Drugstores couldn't keep up with demand. By the mid-1970s, 50 million Americans were following Pauling's advice. Vitamin manufacturers called it "the Linus Pauling effect."

    Scientists weren't as enthusiastic. On December 14, 1942, about thirty years before Pauling published his first book, Donald Cowan, Harold Diehl, and Abe Baker, from the University of Minnesota, published a paper in the Journal of the American Medical Association titled "Vitamins for the Prevention of Colds." The authors concluded, "Under the conditions of this controlled study, in which 980 colds were treated . . . there is no indication that vitamin C alone, an antihistamine alone, or vitamin C plus an antihistamine have any important effect on the duration or severity of infections of the upper respiratory tract."


    Other studies followed. After Pauling's pronouncement, researchers at the University of Maryland gave 3,000 milligrams of vitamin C every day for three weeks to eleven volunteers and a sugar pill (placebo) to ten others. Then they infected volunteers with a common cold virus. All developed cold symptoms of similar duration. At the University of Toronto, researchers administered vitamin C or placebo to 3,500 volunteers. Again, vitamin C didn't prevent colds, even in those receiving as much as 2,000 milligrams a day. In 2002, researchers in the Netherlands administered multivitamins or placebo to more than 600 volunteers. Again, no difference. At least 15 studies have now shown that vitamin C doesn't treat the common cold. As a consequence, neither the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Dietetic Association, the Center for Human Nutrition at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, nor the Department of Health and Human Services recommend supplemental vitamin C for the prevention or treatment of colds.

    Although study after study showed that he was wrong, Pauling refused to believe it, continuing to promote vitamin C in speeches, popular articles, and books. When he occasionally appeared before the media with obvious cold symptoms, he said he was suffering from allergies.

    Then Linus Pauling upped the ante. He claimed that vitamin C not only prevented colds; it cured cancer.

    In 1971, Pauling received a letter from Ewan Cameron, a Scottish surgeon from a tiny hospital outside Glasgow. Cameron wrote that cancer patients who were treated with ten grams of vitamin C every day had fared better than those who weren't. Pauling was ecstatic. He decided to publish Cameron's findings in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). Pauling assumed that as a member of the academy he could publish a paper in PNAS whenever he wanted; only three papers submitted by academy members had been rejected in more than half a century. Pauling's paper was rejected anyway, further tarnishing his reputation among scientists. Later, the paper was published in Oncology, a journal for cancer specialists. When researchers evaluated the data, the flaw became obvious: the cancer victims Cameron had treated with vitamin C were healthier at the start of therapy, so their outcomes were better. After that, scientists no longer took Pauling's claims about vitamins seriously.


    But Linus Pauling still had clout with the media. In 1971, he declared that vitamin C would cause a 10 percent decrease in deaths from cancer. In 1977, he went even further. "My present estimate is that a decrease of 75 percent can be achieved with vitamin C alone," he wrote, "and a further decrease by use of other nutritional supplements." With cancer in their rearview mirror, Pauling predicted, Americans would live longer, healthier lives. "Life expectancy will be 100 to 110 years," he said, "and in the course of time, the maximum age might be 150 years."

    Cancer victims now had reason for hope. Wanting to participate in the Pauling miracle, they urged their doctors to give them massive doses of vitamin C. "For about seven or eight years, we were getting a lot of requests from our families to use high-dose vitamin C," recalls John Maris, chief of oncology and director of the Center for Childhood Cancer Research at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. "We struggled with that. They would say, 'Doctor, do you have a Nobel Prize?' "

    Blindsided, cancer researchers decided to test Pauling's theory. Charles Moertel, of the Mayo Clinic, evaluated 150 cancer victims: half received ten grams of vitamin C a day and half didn't. The vitamin C-treated group showed no difference in symptoms or mortality.

    Moertel concluded, "We were unable to show a therapeutic benefit of high-dose vitamin C." Pauling was outraged. He wrote an angry letter to the New England Journal of Medicine, which had published the study, claiming that Moertel had missed the point. Of course vitamin C hadn't worked: Moertel had treated patients who had already received chemotherapy. Pauling claimed that vitamin C worked only if cancer victims had received no prior chemotherapy.

    Bullied, Moertel performed a second study; the results were the same. Moertel concluded, "Among patients with measurable disease, none had objective improvement. It can be concluded that high-dose vitamin C therapy is not effective against advanced malignant disease regardless of whether the patient had received any prior chemotherapy." For most doctors, this was the end of it. But not for Linus Pauling. He was simply not to be contradicted. Cameron observed, "I have never seen him so upset. He regards the whole affair as a personal attack on his integrity." Pauling thought Moertel's study was a case of "fraud and deliberate misrepresentation." He consulted lawyers about suing Moertel, but they talked him out of it.

    Subsequent studies have consistently shown that vitamin C doesn't treat cancer."

  12. #12
    Digger takethisbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-11-2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,062
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    no way I'm reading that last post. good info rest of thread tho


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    YOUTUBE: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCMDkRcGP1yP20SOD-oiSGcQ
    Instagram: DIGGER_PCT_2016
    twitter: @takethisbread
    AT 2x, LT, JMT, CT, Camino, Ireland Coast to Coast, HWT, WT, NET, NST, PCT

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xrayextra View Post
    If you must know I'm 54 yrs old. There is no way to change the birth date other than notifying the powers that be. It isn't worth the trouble. Go ahead and mock me all you want. It takes more than that to rustle my jimmies.
    Ha! This is funny! Welcome to Whiteblaze xrayextra!

  14. #14
    CDT - 2013, PCT - 2009, AT - 1300 miles done burger's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-03-2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xrayextra View Post
    One of the hikers I met on the trail was a nutritionist and told me that it sped up the weight loss process by converting the fat to energy faster than if I hadn't taken vitamin c supplements.
    Like I said above, this is totally untrue as long as you're getting your RDA of vitamin C. xray, how about not spreading misinformation?

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-16-2013
    Location
    San Pedro, CA
    Posts
    52
    Images
    5

    Default

    I was gonna say vitamin supplements don't really do anything for you then noticed someone above already stated it...

    With that said, chopped pine needles in a cup of hot water brewed as tea has more vitamin C than a glass of OJ and your body will actually use it properly, unlike a supplement vitamin.

    I have used glucosamine with great results tho. maybe it was a placebo, maybe not

  16. #16
    Registered User ChuckT's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-17-2013
    Location
    Cocoa, FL
    Age
    78
    Posts
    828

    Default

    You do realize that big pharma is watching you? And will be coming by with a bug net ASAP.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
    Miles to go before I sleep. R. Frost

  17. #17
    CDT - 2013, PCT - 2009, AT - 1300 miles done burger's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-03-2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagge Pants View Post
    I have used glucosamine with great results tho. maybe it was a placebo, maybe not
    There actually is good evidence that glucosamine can help knee pain, at least for people with osteoarthritis. I'm not sure if anyone's shown if it helps with the sorts of hiking-caused pains that AT hikers get.

    And don't knock placebo effects! Placebos work for a lot of conditions. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com...g-the-placebo/

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    10-17-2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    64
    Posts
    5,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by takethisbread View Post
    no way I'm reading that last post. good info rest of thread tho...
    This is the problem. The last post provided much data to show that many benefits attributed to vitamin C are a placebo effect (i.e. bogus). People don't want to read that but will think all the other info it "good". It is most likely that the OP lost 65 lbs because he did a thru hike and vitamin supplements had nothing to do with it. He incorrectly said that glucosamine is an amino acid (it isn't) which suggest his sources of information are suspect.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-14-2011
    Location
    texas
    Age
    43
    Posts
    315

    Default

    I lost 40 pounds by Damascus and I had 2 snickers a day...... Snickers Bars = weight loss !!!!!....... it might of had something to do with the 15 miles a day with 30 pounds on my back.... nahhhh had to be the snickers

  20. #20
    Registered User Hot Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-06-2013
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Age
    61
    Posts
    421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xrayextra View Post
    Hi everyone! I thru-hiked last year and lost 65 lbs (233 lbs to 168 lbs).

    About a month prior to my trip I began to supplement my diet with 1000 mg of Vitamin C daily (the body can't process more than 1000 mg per day). I continued this on my AT hike.

    I learned later that Vitamin C helps convert fat to energy. Although I went from basically couch potatoe straight to the trail, I attribute the rapid weight loss to the assist from Vitamin C.

    I know I still would have lost weight but vitamin C helped speed up the process. I dropped 30 by the time I hit Pearisburg, 40 lbs by Harper's Ferry, and 55 by Delaware Water Gap.

    I also recommend taking glucosamine, an amino acid, for your knees and joints (although I didn't take it on the trail I wish I had; I'm taking it now).

    One other thing you need to be aware of. If your sweat begins to smell like amonia, it means you're burning muscle; you've run out of fat to burn so pile on the carbs!

    Good luck hikers!
    So much misinformation here that I will only address the repeated myths surrounding vitamin C. It doesn't prevent colds. It doesn't make you burn fat or lose weight. It doesn't prevent or cure cancer. If you don't have a severe deficiency you're just pissing money away, literally. Not only that, megadoses can give you kidney stones.

    You lost weight because the calories your body required to maintain its weight were more than the calories you shoved in your face.
    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime; give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •