WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Trekking poles

  1. #21
    Registered User Gwilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2012
    Location
    West Richland, WA
    Posts
    30

    Default Costco

    I can't find a link either, but I was there this weekend and there were two full display boxes in the isle with camping gear, tents etc. I'll dig a little further when I get home and see if I can come up with a link.

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-15-2011
    Location
    Lowell, MA
    Posts
    1,319

    Default

    I am also in the flick-lock camp, having a Leki twist-lock fail on me on a summit in the Whites. I prefer cork, but I am fine with decent foam, and do not like hard plastic handles. If you overstress a carbon pole it can shatter. If you overstress an aluminum pole, then it MIGHT bend in a way that you can bend it back into shape, but even if you can that bend point is now weakened and is more likely to fail. You probably need to apply more stress to shatter the carbon than to bend the aluminum. Either works, and if price is a factor aluminum is the way to go.

  3. #23
    GA-ME 2011
    Join Date
    03-17-2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    3,069
    Images
    9

    Default

    If you change the pole length frequently like I do since I use them for tent poles the flip lock is the way to go.

    I've seen carbon poles shatter but I've bent and been able to gently straighten aluminum poles enough to continue using them.

    I don't care for anti-shock myself but my Black Diamond poles have them since that was all that was available at REI at the time.
    "Chainsaw" GA-ME 2011

  4. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-08-2012
    Location
    Taghkanic, New York, United States
    Posts
    3,198
    Journal Entries
    11

    Default

    Some carbon is a gimmick, as heavy as AL. The real stuff is about 1/2 the weight but is more fragile. Its a trade off. I made it from GA to PA before having a non-critical break in a carbon pole. From that point on I had 2 critical breaks - one on a 8 hr + rescue of a injured hiker on Mt Washington over a boulder field (thank you REI for replacing them so willingly).

    Snaplock is the way to go, twist lock is frustrating (but usable). Twistlock is troublesome with some tents that require treking poles as supports.

    Antishock is nice, very nice, but IMHO not worth the weight. The shock is not 'damaging', but more forgiving.

    Cork if you can get it, foam if you can't. Like asking for a sippy lid at Dunkin Donuts.

  5. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-15-2013
    Location
    Illinois
    Age
    46
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Thank you everyone for the advice, I went with these http://www.sierratradingpost.com/kom...colorFamily=99

  6. #26
    lemon b's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-17-2011
    Location
    4 miles from Trailhead in Becket, Ma.
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,277
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    56

    Default

    I have usd Komperdell. Not Carbon Fibe because any bow hunter knows that cracks. Also have a walmart job. But the best I've found is just a lucky find piece of wood cut down to fit my needs.

  7. #27

    Default

    I use Leki Trail poles...foam grips, not anti-shock. I think I paid around $75 in 2010. They've served me well and I'm very pleased with them.

  8. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-26-2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,410
    Images
    21

    Default

    My two cents for what it is worth.

    Antishock defeats the purpose for which I use hiking poles, and that is to transfer some of the load off my legs and feet to my arms to give me more stability and save my knees, especially on the down hills.

    By the time the antishock has compressed, my legs have already absorbed the shock, so what is the point?

    As for flick vs. twist, I am a big guys 6'3" 220 lbs, and I have yet to use a pair of twists that do not eventually slip on me under load. My son used twist locks for several years when he was younger, and never had a problem. He is 15 now and almost as tall as me, and now he finds his twist locks slip.

    I guess if you don't put a lot of weight on your poles and just use them kind of like outriggers for a little stability, both antishock and twist lock are usable features. If you use them like I do, and you are my size, the advantages of flicklocks and no antishock are much more attractive.

    As for carbon fiber, since I use my poles as weight bearing tools, I don't think CF is a good option, but that does not mean it's not a good option for others that weigh less or use the poles differently.

    Have said all that, on all quality poles you can turn the antishock off, and the twist locks work acceptably well for most people. Just buy quality poles and they will be fine.

    Oh, and I like cork, it doesn't seem to get as slippery in hot weather with sweaty hands. In colder weather it doesn't matter.

  9. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-08-2012
    Location
    Taghkanic, New York, United States
    Posts
    3,198
    Journal Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bfayer View Post


    As for carbon fiber, since I use my poles as weight bearing tools, I don't think CF is a good option, but that does not mean it's not a good option for others that weigh less or use the poles differently.
    Want to comment on this as I also put great weight on my poles, sometimes suspending my entire weight on them for a moment, carbon works fine for this, the issue is not in compression (weight) but in bending (as in falling on them sideways).

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •