WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 44
  1. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-06-2014
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Age
    51
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Just hearing that the Humane Society was involved in this sets off alarm bells. Yes, they do a a lot of good but are also in cohorts with PITA and other environmental groups that would like to take ban all hunting, fishing, and any other outdoor activity they feel is hurting or disrupting animals. Many of these people are impossible to reason with and they use dogs and cats as a way to fund there true agenda. That no, fish, bird, or animal be harvested or in many cases even disturbed.
    Here in south florida they are working on removing channel makers from many inshore waterways and pushing for no-motor zones. In many of these areas the wildlife has come back in a huge way and the fishing is the best its been in years but good forbid a fish tortured by a hook attached to a line and then released.
    In fact the american crocodile (a vert shy creature) has made such a comeback one actually attacked a swimmer this month.

    Even if you make a fishing area catch and release only they will still push that just catching fish is evil and the fish suffer.

    It took me a long time to realize that some of the more extremist groups use the Humane Society in this way.

    Don't think that it doesn't affect hikers who love nature. Once they're done going after fisherman and hunters they will find a reason to shut down hiking areas if they feel a animal is being disturbed.

    Sorry for the vent but be wary.

    As to the guy that said there are to many humans. This true. Another world war, yellowstone erupting, solar flare taking out the grid, or some other natural event would be interesting.
    Good forbid another black plague or other disease could get ugly. Pharmaceutical companies have stopped funding new antibiotics due the fact they make a lot more money selling sexual enhancement drugs. Many common disease are not responding to the over use of current antibiotics.

    They earth will regulate herself. When she get tired of us she will eliminate us and some other beings will take our place. Just its not in my life time.

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-06-2014
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Age
    51
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Also baiting bears isn't like giving a free hand out.

    Its like having a bear canister but with a few holes drilled in it so the bears can smell easily but can't get in.

    Then this 50 gallon barrel(I mean bear canister with holes in it) is chained to a tree under a tree stand. Yes some food is spread around the area but not much. just enough to keep the bears coming back daily. They guides will often come by and but just a bit of food out daily to keep the bears coming back and doing their best to get to the mother load in the big barrel. They guides know if they can use trail cams at these sites to locate a trophy bear and keep it coming back so they can charge more and a $500 dollar tip might be much much more for a true trophy bear.

    If you just put food out the bears would eat it right up. Come back and find no food and never come back. If the site isn't used often then they hunter will just sit in a tree watching squirrels.

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-06-2014
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Age
    51
    Posts
    166

    Default

    What does a Kodiak bear hunt cost? Costs are dictated by the distance you are from your hunt area, how you plan to get there, what gear you need to purchase, and a variety of other factors unique to your situation. Here are some of the "fixed costs":

    Hunting license Alaska resident = $25
    Nonresident = $85
    Nonresident Alien = $300 Bear tag Alaska resident = $25
    Nonresident (Alaska military) = $250
    Nonresident = $500
    Nonresident Alien = $600 Land use fees Public land = no charge
    Private land = $200 – $1,200 Guide fees $10,000 – $22,000 Taxidermy fees $1,000 – $7,000 Access to hunt area Aircraft weight includes passengers and gear. Floatplane (varies by type of aircraft) 800lbs=~$400/hour, 1,200lbs=$500-$600/hour. Boat (daily rate) $500-$1200/person
    Brown Bear Hunt Prices

    Moose cannot be "added" on to these prices. See combination hunt prices below. Dates are the dates you arrive and depart camp.
    Date Ranges Guides / Hunters Bear Hunting Days Cost per Hunter Bear Kill Fee Wolf Kill Fee
    4/14 - 4/24 1/1 9 $25,500 1st Bear Included, 2nd Bear $3,000 $200
    4/24 - 5/4 1 / 1 9 $25,000 1st Bear Included, 2nd Bear $3,000 $200
    4/14 - 5/4 1 / 2 9 $18,500 1st Bear Included, 2nd Bear $2,500 $200
    5/4 - 5/15, 5/15 - 5/25 Baited# 1 /1 10 $18,000 $3,000 2nd bear No Wolf Hunting
    5/4 - 5/15, 5/15 - 5/25 No Bait 1 / 1 10 $14,500 $2,500 2nd bear No Wolf Hunting
    8/19-27 1 / 1 7 $11,000 $2,000 2nd bear $200
    8/19-30 1 / 1 10 $13,500 2 bears, no kill fees $200
    8/27- 9/4 1 / 1 7 $10,300 $2,000 2nd bear $200
    9/1 - 9/16 1 / 1 7 $11,500 $2,000 2nd bear $200
    9/1 - 9/16 1 / 1 10 $12,500 $2,000 2nd bear $200
    9/16 - 10/10 1 / 1 8 $9,300 $2,500 2nd bear $200
    9/16 - 10/10 1 / 1 10 $10,500 $2,500 2nd bear $200
    9/16 - 10/10 1 / 2 10 $9,500 $2,500 2nd bear $200

    Black bear kill fees
    Kill Fees

    Black Bear $800 / $2,000


    This is for Alaska.

    Maine Hunts

    All bear hunts are six days lodging and five days hunting. The best time to arrive is Sunday afternoon.
    A 50% deposit is required on all hunts. No deposits refunded.
    PERSONAL CHECKS ACCEPTED ON RESERVATIONS ONLY.
    Please make Checks Payable to either "Foggy Mountain Guide Service" or to "Wayne Bosowicz".


    Bear Hunting in Maine's Vast Highlands, Moosehead & Katahdin Region - August & September
    $2,195.00
    (2014 & 2015)
    (Housekeeping Accommodations)
    You will be set up on real active baits and mostly all good close shooting. Our specially processed bait along with our own highly productive scent formula are a couple of reasons why we have such good success with this method of hunting. Non-hunting spouse or partner $375.00. Land Access Fee $100.00 additional per person.

    Bear Hunting in Maine's West Branch Region - September
    $2,495.00
    (2014 & 2015)
    (American Plan)
    A six day stay and a five day hunt tailored the same as our regular base camp housekeeping hunts. However, this hunt will also include all home-cooked meals buffet-style said to be the finest in Maine with the coffee pot always on. Non-hunting spouse or partner $675.00. Land Access Fee $100.00 additional per person.

    Maine hunts are much cheaper but why hunt in Maine for bears that run away when you can hunt in alaska for a bear that may kill you if you don't kill it?

  4. #24
    GA-ME 2011
    Join Date
    03-17-2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Age
    66
    Posts
    3,069
    Images
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TJ aka Teej View Post
    Bear over bait is all about the revenue produced by marketing to out of state clientele.
    And this is a bad thing?
    The state of Maine makes considerable money off liscenses, fees and taxes from all those non-resident hunters coming into the state to spend money, not to mention the money to small businesses mostly in rural areas where there are few job opportunities.

    If I lived in ME I'd vote no.
    "Chainsaw" GA-ME 2011

  5. #25
    Registered User runt13's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-28-2011
    Location
    Jackson, NJ
    Age
    56
    Posts
    182

    Default

    NO!

    I am an avid bear hunter, I prefer the still hunting method and would not personally use dogs or traps. but I am not against it.

    RUNT ''13''

  6. #26
    Registered User weary's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-15-2003
    Location
    Phippsburg, Maine, United States
    Posts
    10,115
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TJ aka Teej View Post
    Bear over bait is for tourist hunters and locals who suck at hunting.
    The argument, that if some guide in Jackman can't guarantee a successful bear kill to his out of state clients it means herds of bears wandering around Portland eating children, is nonsense.
    I agree, absolutely

  7. #27

    Default

    I would be for special bait and trap licenses that have specific requirements (ME does require the trapper to check the traps every 24 hours), however, the use of dogs has been problematic over the years. Dogs can't read well, so they tend to blow past the posted no trespassing signs, with them, the owners blow by them too. Our property in ME (and that of about a dozen neighbors) was constantly invaded by hunters and dogs until we finally got serious about it and hung cameras out. We identified most every trespasser (some of them by the dogs). The properties were well posted, signs made it clear there would be consequences, and there were.

    To date the property owners have successfully prosecuted about 60 criminal trespassers, with most of them losing in court. We also made it clear "accelerated rehabilitation" was not an option we would sign "yes" to. The most egregious were those who insisted they could bring their ATVs into private lands. Those we pursued monetary compensation in civil court to return the woods they ruined to pristine conditions.

    I would include dogs in the "ok with permit" column once they can read. Clearly by our experience some of their owners are not literate.

  8. #28
    Registered User brian039's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-27-2009
    Location
    Guntersville, Alabama
    Age
    45
    Posts
    580
    Images
    2

    Default

    No. From what I understand from the wildlife biologists is that without baiting the success rate of bear hunting goes down to nearly 0%.

  9. #29
    Registered User Lyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-25-2006
    Location
    Croswell, MI
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3,934
    Images
    68

    Default

    I never trust these types of convenient statistics. 93% of the bears killed used bait, dogs or traps. Only 7% were killed without using these tactics. Perhaps that is because 93% of the hunters are using these techniques, not because they are the only effective methods. Unless you can see the studies that support the statistics, the statistics alone can be made to "prove" any position desired.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnySnook View Post
    Just hearing that the Humane Society was involved in this sets off alarm bells. Yes, they do a a lot of good but are also in cohorts with PITA and other environmental groups that would like to take ban all hunting, fishing, and any other outdoor activity they feel is hurting or disrupting animals. Many of these people are impossible to reason with and they use dogs and cats as a way to fund there true agenda. That no, fish, bird, or animal be harvested or in many cases even disturbed.
    Here in south florida they are working on removing channel makers from many inshore waterways and pushing for no-motor zones. In many of these areas the wildlife has come back in a huge way and the fishing is the best its been in years but good forbid a fish tortured by a hook attached to a line and then released.
    In fact the american crocodile (a vert shy creature) has made such a comeback one actually attacked a swimmer this month.

    Even if you make a fishing area catch and release only they will still push that just catching fish is evil and the fish suffer.

    It took me a long time to realize that some of the more extremist groups use the Humane Society in this way.

    Don't think that it doesn't affect hikers who love nature. Once they're done going after fisherman and hunters they will find a reason to shut down hiking areas if they feel a animal is being disturbed.

    Sorry for the vent but be wary.

    As to the guy that said there are to many humans. This true. Another world war, yellowstone erupting, solar flare taking out the grid, or some other natural event would be interesting.
    Good forbid another black plague or other disease could get ugly. Pharmaceutical companies have stopped funding new antibiotics due the fact they make a lot more money selling sexual enhancement drugs. Many common disease are not responding to the over use of current antibiotics.

    They earth will regulate herself. When she get tired of us she will eliminate us and some other beings will take our place. Just its not in my life time.
    Some folk would say pretty much the same things about the gun lobby.....

  11. #31
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default

    The idea that more than half of the bears harvested on Maine are taken by out-of-staters over a pile of stale donuts is unsettling. More so when you consider that nearly all of those out-of-staters didn't even place the bait there themselves, but rather paid a Registered Maine Guide many hundreds of dollars to do it for them.

    Is this good for the bear population? I honestly don't know.

    Is it good for the hunters who go back to their suburban homes with a bear? Obviously, or they wouldn't have gone to so much effort and expense.

    I wonder if those hunters tell their wives, friends and coworkers why they were so successful, though.

  12. #32

    Default

    Question.

    how many days does Bear season run in Maine, and what is the bag limit?

  13. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-03-2010
    Location
    Windham, Maine
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,166

    Default

    I would vote Yes to ban baiting. If, as a consequence, the get 'Planet of the Bears' then we could adjust our hunting laws accordingly.
    Let me go

  14. #34
    Wanna-be hiker trash
    Join Date
    03-05-2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    6,922
    Images
    78

    Default

    I would vote to have the hunting laws developed by professional wildlife biologists and conservation management authorities and not by feel good voter ballot initiatives.
    Last edited by Sarcasm the elf; 10-03-2014 at 09:07.
    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

  15. #35
    Registered User Lyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-25-2006
    Location
    Croswell, MI
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3,934
    Images
    68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasm the elf View Post
    I would vote to have the hunting laws developed by professional wildlife biologists and conservation management authorities and not by feel good voter ballot initiatives.
    Except that these are political positions, or at least, overseen by politicians who are extremely influenced by and beholding to big money special interests. Government endeavors need public over site.

    Baiting is NOT hunting, it's commercial killing of wildlife for profit.

  16. #36
    Wanna-be hiker trash
    Join Date
    03-05-2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    6,922
    Images
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Except that these are political positions, or at least, overseen by politicians who are extremely influenced by and beholding to big money special interests. Government endeavors need public over site.

    Baiting is NOT hunting, it's commercial killing of wildlife for profit.
    Ah yes, the purists mantra that profit is somehow evil when it comes to hunting. I used to think that way and stillsympathize with it to an extent, but over the years I've slowly realized that I'd much rather have hunters make an economically viable use of open space than to see it logged or turned into condos. Profit and hunters have done more to fund the protection the environment than almost any other group (to the tune of 8 billion dollars through the Pittman-Robertson conservation act alone.)

    I don't find the idea of hunting over bait to be very sporting, but it certainly is hunting and as long as it is regulated within the control of a responsible management program then I'm fine with it.
    Colorless green ideas sleep furiously.

  17. #37
    AT 2012
    Join Date
    09-11-2006
    Location
    Wallingford, CT
    Age
    72
    Posts
    1,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcasm the elf:1912901
    I would vote to have the hunting laws developed by professional wildlife biologists and conservation management authorities and not by feel good voter ballot initiatives.
    Good point.
    Lazarus

  18. #38
    Registered User swjohnsey's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-13-2010
    Location
    Kingsville, Texas
    Age
    77
    Posts
    2,331

    Default

    I would vote for allowing bears only to be taken with a knife.

  19. #39

    Default

    Most black bear have a distinct fear of humans unless they are sick, even then they are usually wary. Typically, black bears only show aggression towards humans when they are taunted, have things thrown at them, or dogs are allowed to chase them. While there are "park bears" in the Smokies and other places, even they are skittish around people for the most part. Having had encounters with black bears over my 50 years in the back country too numerous to count, I have yet to run across one that was aggressive and caused me concern for my safety. Brown bear would fit that description however.
    Last edited by Alligator; 10-07-2014 at 22:51. Reason: Politics quote + response removed.

  20. #40

    Default

    Bear hunting does bring a lot of revenue to the state from out of state hunters. How a ban would affect the state and the DIWF budget would a big concern for me if I was from the state. I do know that the Maine warden service is often called upon for assistance with all kinds of activities not directly related to hunting and fishing. They participate in a good number of search and rescues, including for those of us who hike. With the elimination of this hunting I could foresee a reduction in their budget which could affect these types of search and rescue operations that is being funded by hunters.

    The best people to decide on this issue is the wildlife biologists and conservation professionals with the state officials.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •