Hi;
I am trying to compare AA alkaline - Duracell copper top - batteries to Energizer "Ultimate Lithium" AA batteries for use in my Black Diamond Icon LED headlamp. I plan to do some cold weather hiking/backpacking, and know that lithium is better in this respect. What I am trying to find out is whether the higher cost of the lithium battery will pay off in the end.
Energizer claims that their Ultimate Lithium AA battery will last up to 9x longer in digital cameras than their alkaline "Max" battery. That's great, but I cannot compare my headlamp to a digital camera. I would expect that the current drain for the headlamp is far greater than the digital camera, and from what I have seen on the graphs of lithium (non-rechargeable) vs alkaline, the advantage drops off as current drain rises. I read somewhere that one can expect about 1.5x alkaline for lithium used in an LED headlamp.
Perhaps though, the biggest advantage is weight. For a 5-day/night trek, the weight adds up, and even the relatively small (1.5x) hours of life advantage could prove to be the deciding factor if it's a question of needing to carry spares or not. Of course, if one expects to reach a decent grocery or quik-mart at some point, batteries can be replaced.
So, my real question is whether or not the advantage of lithium over alkaline is worth the extra cost of lithium.
Note: The Energizer Ultimate Lithium 4-pak of AA cost about $8 on Amazon, while I can buy a 20-pak of Duracell AA copper top for $14.79 at BJ's.
Arden