WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-28-2015
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Age
    69
    Posts
    960

    Default Anyone Familiar With These Maps?

    National Geographic has a set of "Topographic Map Guides" for the AT. The ATC store says they are "NEW" and there are 13 that cover the whole AT. I am wondering if anyone has any experience with these particular maps, what your opinion of them is, what do they weigh, and can you separate the individual maps. Thanks for your help.

    http://www.natgeomaps.com/trail-maps...hic-map-guides

    https://www.atctrailstore.org/catalog/iteminfo.cfm?itemid=835&compid=1
    Last edited by TexasBob; 01-21-2016 at 14:47.
    If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.

  2. #2
    Registered User ChuckT's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-17-2013
    Location
    Cocoa, FL
    Age
    78
    Posts
    828

    Default

    Do they have a scale to them where there was enough detail for field use or are they tack on the wall and "I was (right) there!" souvenirs?
    Miles to go before I sleep. R. Frost

  3. #3

    Default

    These are topographical maps. If you are familiar with navigating with a map and compass, then you will be familiar with this type of map. You shouldn't need a compass, as the AT is clearly marked. You will need an understanding of contour lines and be able to properly orient that map.

    If this sounds cool to you, then these are maps for you. If this sounds foreign, then stick with one of the excellent guide books available.

  4. #4
    Registered User Tennessee Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-10-2007
    Location
    Morganton, North Carolina
    Age
    46
    Posts
    3,619
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    242

    Default

    From the samples I saw, the ATC maps are easier to understand.

    Nat Geo maps are usually revised every 10 or so years where the ATC maps are updated more frequently (every new guidebook edition).
    Nat Geo maps usually carry some outdated info or trails that don't exist anymore.
    ''Tennessee Viking'
    Mountains to Sea Trail Hiker & Maintainer
    Former TEHCC (AT) Maintainer

  5. #5
    Registered User Cotton Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-11-2010
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    67
    Posts
    183
    Images
    3

    Default

    I bought a couple of the NatGeo AT maps because I had heard they were more detailed. The maps I received were printed in a book format (8.5" x 9.5"). Because of the smaller format, it didn't include as much surrounding area as the ATC maps and the scale was such that I wouldn't attempt to get a bearing from it. I would view them as a reference for the curious, only, NOT for navigating. I do have NatGeo maps for GSMNP and the Shenandoah National Park, which are traditional fold out maps with good detail.

    I'll be using the ATC maps for the AT except the White Mountains, for which I bought the AMC maps. I was told these were better than the ATC maps, but I'll see when I get them.

  6. #6
    Registered User egilbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-18-2014
    Location
    Lewiston and Biddeford, Maine
    Age
    61
    Posts
    2,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cotton Terry View Post
    I bought a couple of the NatGeo AT maps because I had heard they were more detailed. The maps I received were printed in a book format (8.5" x 9.5"). Because of the smaller format, it didn't include as much surrounding area as the ATC maps and the scale was such that I wouldn't attempt to get a bearing from it. I would view them as a reference for the curious, only, NOT for navigating. I do have NatGeo maps for GSMNP and the Shenandoah National Park, which are traditional fold out maps with good detail.

    I'll be using the ATC maps for the AT except the White Mountains, for which I bought the AMC maps. I was told these were better than the ATC maps, but I'll see when I get them.
    The one feature i liked about these booklets are the elevation profiles at the bottom of the page that corresponded with the map. But, as a map, they are kind of limiting because it only shows whats within a few thousand feet of the AT. I'd rather have a real map.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    09-28-2015
    Location
    Spring, Texas
    Age
    69
    Posts
    960

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cotton Terry View Post
    I bought a couple of the NatGeo AT maps because I had heard they were more detailed. The maps I received were printed in a book format (8.5" x 9.5"). Because of the smaller format, it didn't include as much surrounding area as the ATC maps and the scale was such that I wouldn't attempt to get a bearing from it. I would view them as a reference for the curious, only, NOT for navigating. I do have NatGeo maps for GSMNP and the Shenandoah National Park, which are traditional fold out maps with good detail.

    I'll be using the ATC maps for the AT except the White Mountains, for which I bought the AMC maps. I was told these were better than the ATC maps, but I'll see when I get them.
    Quote Originally Posted by egilbe View Post
    The one feature i liked about these booklets are the elevation profiles at the bottom of the page that corresponded with the map. But, as a map, they are kind of limiting because it only shows whats within a few thousand feet of the AT. I'd rather have a real map.
    Thank you both very much I think you have answered my questions. I am planning to use the Guthook app but wanted a backup and it sounds like the regular AT maps are a better way to go.
    If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •