As some of you know, I plan to thru-hike after I retire from the Army in 2007.
The other day I was discussing it at work, and someone suggested I try and see if I could get permissive TDY from the Army to do it 2004 (when I should change duty stations anyway) to thru-hike the AT as a publicity thing for Army recruiting.
At first I thought what a hoot. Like they would really go for it. But then I thought "what the heck, all they can say is no". So I seriously thought about writing a proposal and sending it to the Army Recruiting command, for whom I once worked as a Recruiter. The thought was to thru-hike and along the trail stop and do public speaking for recruiters about military opportunity, service to country, training, etc. It may sound far fetched, but the Army actually has sporting teams that compete internationally such as at the Olympics. We have boxers, coaches, runners, shooters, etc. Often in the off season they use these guys to do public speaking. All I'm asking is 179 days.
Then I thought about it, this would really be a "stunt hike" although my real intent is to get a free thru-hike while getting paid. How would the trail community think about it? I mean there are lots of patriotic Americans on the trail, but a thru-hike with the agenda of drumming up enlistments. Seems like some kind of conflict of interest although I can't put my finger on exactly why.
My other concern is if they really did accept it, then they would put all kinds of rules on my hike like using Army issue equipment. Yuck!
Anyway, I thought as a hypothetical question only, what would ya'll think? Please be very honest!