"better more efficient stable energy efficient mechanics". What the fook does THAT even mean?"
Again, I detailed clearly what this entails. If you choose to ignore that information then yes you might see that as some unsupported mystical phrase of unknown definition. You might consider my posts more fully rather than mentally choosing to delete or ignore it. This is one of the reasons why my posts are so long. I attempt to offer context, greater clarity, support for conclusions, and depth. Yet, it is still ignored which leads to faulty assumptions of intent or position.
I have no problem being called out, asked to explain or clarify, be corrected, or being vastly tolerant of non like minded approaches or beliefs. I'm as fallible as any. If you want to debate than at least attempt to debate by knowing my position and not falsely assuming otherwise.
I don't know what you're problem is with what I've said because you obviously haven't considered what I've said.