WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 54
  1. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-15-2015
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Age
    38
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by colorado_rob View Post
    Sounds like you're on it, well done! I agree on the lack of need for a footprint, though with a dog, that might change things a bit. maybe a small piece of Tyvek for IN the tent to protect the floor from the pooch-paws/nails? I used my BA fly creek sans-footprint for a half an AT and at least that many other nights in Colorado, my floor is still just fine (no holes or even bag wear spots). I've never, ever used a footprint on any of my tents over 50 years of backpacking, zero issues. Footprints are extraneous weight and cost, more marketing than anything else. If you MUST use one, get a sheet of polycro for 6 bucks and 2 ounces, cut to size.

    Not to be too picky cmoulder, but the 100-ish gram canisters I've bought (some are 110 grams) are anywhere from 7 to 7.5 ounces, not over 8. But certainly greater than 6. Good point on falsely quoted weights. The only companies I've run into that were perfectly honest are ULA and zpacks. Even Big Agnes and Osprey fudge a tad low in their specs.

    I personally like both a pack liner and pack cover, realizing that the pack cover isn't enough, though if you choose only one, the liner is better. I like the "first line" of protection, and it also keeps the pack fabric mostly dry, which saves the weight of the wet pack fabric. I did a test on my ULA OHM, and this amounted to 6 saved ounces on rainy days, at the cost of carrying a 1.5 cuben fiber pack cover all the time. trade-offs!

    Finally, I only backflush my sawyer about once a week, I see no need to backflush more often. I don't even carry the syringe; I backflush by holding the filter backwards against a sink faucet (in towns) and let that pressure flush it out. Prepare to get a tad wet until you learn how to hold it tight enough....
    I've toyed with just getting a small piece of tyvek or something to put just near the entry way and under his bag to help with claws. I keep his nails short and he's usually tired enough that he just passes out... maybe I'll revisit that idea though. Good to know how long and resilient your BA has been!

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-25-2014
    Location
    Westchester County, NY
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Not to be too picky cmoulder, but the 100-ish gram canisters I've bought (some are 110 grams) are anywhere from 7 to 7.5 ounces, not over 8. But certainly greater than 6. Good point on falsely quoted weights. The only companies I've run into that were perfectly honest are ULA and zpacks. Even Big Agnes and Osprey fudge a tad low in their specs.


    You are correct. I just weighed one and it's 7.2oz.

    canister weight.jpg

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-02-2014
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by colorado_rob View Post
    Sounds like you're on it, well done! I agree on the lack of need for a footprint, though with a dog, that might change things a bit. maybe a small piece of Tyvek for IN the tent to protect the floor from the pooch-paws/nails? I used my BA fly creek sans-footprint for a half an AT and at least that many other nights in Colorado, my floor is still just fine (no holes or even bag wear spots). I've never, ever used a footprint on any of my tents over 50 years of backpacking, zero issues. Footprints are extraneous weight and cost, more marketing than anything else. If you MUST use one, get a sheet of polycro for 6 bucks and 2 ounces, cut to size.

    Not to be too picky cmoulder, but the 100-ish gram canisters I've bought (some are 110 grams) are anywhere from 7 to 7.5 ounces, not over 8. But certainly greater than 6. Good point on falsely quoted weights. The only companies I've run into that were perfectly honest are ULA and zpacks. Even Big Agnes and Osprey fudge a tad low in their specs.

    I personally like both a pack liner and pack cover, realizing that the pack cover isn't enough, though if you choose only one, the liner is better. I like the "first line" of protection, and it also keeps the pack fabric mostly dry, which saves the weight of the wet pack fabric. I did a test on my ULA OHM, and this amounted to 6 saved ounces on rainy days, at the cost of carrying a 1.5 cuben fiber pack cover all the time. trade-offs!

    Finally, I only backflush my sawyer about once a week, I see no need to backflush more often. I don't even carry the syringe; I backflush by holding the filter backwards against a sink faucet (in towns) and let that pressure flush it out. Prepare to get a tad wet until you learn how to hold it tight enough....
    My Sawyer slowed down after only 80 litres, or so. I only backflushed....maybe....every 12 litres? This was from some silty water, but still....
    The Sawyer still works, but it is too slow to carry now. I read up on about 100 reviews and a significant amount had the same complaint. The Sawyer Mini got even worse reviews about the need to flush after every use.

    I went back to my FirstNeed XLE Deluxe purifier. I know. It weighs a whole pound. But, it works and handles viruses as well. Great flow rate. It must be backflushed after every use, as well.

    There is only one filter/purifier I know of that can handle freezing. And it costs $350!

    YMMV!!!!

  4. #24
    Registered User colorado_rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-20-2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    68
    Posts
    4,540
    Images
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScareBear View Post
    My Sawyer slowed down after only 80 litres, or so. I only backflushed....maybe....every 12 litres? This was from some silty water, but still....
    The Sawyer still works, but it is too slow to carry now. I read up on about 100 reviews and a significant amount had the same complaint. The Sawyer Mini got even worse reviews about the need to flush after every use.

    I went back to my FirstNeed XLE Deluxe purifier. I know. It weighs a whole pound. But, it works and handles viruses as well. Great flow rate. It must be backflushed after every use, as well.

    There is only one filter/purifier I know of that can handle freezing. And it costs $350!

    YMMV!!!!
    Yeah, that mini sure doesn't work long before needing to be flushed. I still do carry it for 2-day solo trips. Have you tried using sink water pressure to back flush your regular sawyer to get it flowing better again? One other downfall of using sawyers is letting it sit a long period of time having last cleaned it with tap water. Our tap water is horribly "hard". Take a glass of water and let it evaporate... yikes! Calcium deposits. So, when I do clean my sawyer at home, I always finish up with a couple flushes of distilled water (using the syringe) to flush out city water before letting the filter dry out. Perhaps your sawyer has calcium deposits on the filter element. Maybe a vinegar cleaning would work for it to revive its usefulness.

  5. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-01-2007
    Location
    Ridgefield, Connecticut
    Age
    46
    Posts
    252

    Default

    Nice setup. If you're carrying that little weight, a two-pound pack seems heavy. My Gossamer Gear Murmur Hyperlight is 12 oz for instance. Its on sale now for ~$100. I always look to cut weight on the big four first as that's where you're going to find your biggest savings. It holds true in this case.

    ZPacks cuben fiber pack cover will save you an additional three ounces, but again you could save a lot more by focusing on the pack itself.

    Good luck!
    Springer to Katahdin: 1991-2018

  6. #26

    Default

    Replace kettle with a aluminum can if your just heating water, something like "Zelph" makes.

  7. #27
    Registered User Engine's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-29-2009
    Location
    Citrus Springs, FL
    Age
    59
    Posts
    1,673
    Images
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lilbear View Post
    Does that mean you don't bear bag? What do you do instead? I'm looking at an ursack minor, but not sure if it's worth the $ or weight.
    I do bear bag, we just traded out the paracord for something better suited to the task. I use (quoted from Mountain Laurel Designs website) "50' of SuperGlide Line. 2mm Hi Vis coated spectra line. 975lb test! Smaller and lighter or uncoated lines can cut into tree branches and get stuck and damage trees. This is the lightest Eco Friendly bear bag line available."
    “He is richest who is content with the least, for content is the wealth of nature.” –Socrates

  8. #28

    Default

    I'll second the paracord upgrade to some Z-Line Slick Dyneema Cord if you're using it to hang a bear bag. Packs up into a tiny space, is light, and slips over the bark smoothly without sawing through it. I bought 50 feet of it, and cut off a ten foot section that I used as a clothesline.

    I stored my water in Smart Water bottles. Backflushing works best with hard pressure, otherwise you end up just kind of pushing little channels through the dirt in your filter with the remainder of the sludge eventually settling in forever. I ditched the syringe and just kneeled on a full water bottle to backflush as efficiently as possible.

  9. #29

    Default

    Some quick thoughts: it would be free to save 5 oz by leaving footprint at home; it would not cost much to save on fuel/stove weight to switch to alcohol and/or Esbit for cooking; same for using lighter line than paracord; you could for about $25 save 3 oz by going to a light headlamp like the Petzl eLite; for a lot of $$$ you could cut your shelter weight nearly in half with a Zpacks Duplex for you and fido.

    And finally: No cathole trowel? What are you thinking? ; )
    Find the LIGHT STUFF at QiWiz.net

    The lightest cathole trowels, wood burning stoves, windscreens, spatulas,
    cooking options, titanium and aluminum pots, and buck saws on the planet



  10. #30
    Garlic
    Join Date
    10-15-2008
    Location
    Golden CO
    Age
    67
    Posts
    5,630
    Images
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QiWiz View Post
    ...And finally: No cathole trowel? What are you thinking? ; )
    Oh, the humanity! (If you're new here or don't get the joke, see QiWiz's signature line.)
    "Throw a loaf of bread and a pound of tea in an old sack and jump over the back fence." John Muir on expedition planning

  11. #31

    Default

    People love to commonly obsess on saving wt through gear changes. Wow, do we love to obsess about gear, don't we? Many of the suggestions here revolve around saving a few ounces by narrowly focusing on the gear category. What you might want to do is closely examine your consumables wt as that is very often a place where one can save lbs through better approaches. Do NOT ignore, as it all too frequently is, reducing wt hauled in the consumable wt saving category!

    Consider, saving 3, 4, to 6 or 8 oz on gear is offset by carrying one too many extra uneaten dinners, 2 or maybe 3 energy bars, two extra uneaten handfuls of trail mix, unnecessarily carrying an extra 1/2 Liter(1.1 lb) of H2O, taking along a 8 oz compressed fuel canister when a 4 oz gets the job done(note this doesn't include the wt of the can just the product inside the can!), or the lightest wt new fangled DIY achy stove design that saves 3/4 oz. And, yet over and over and over wt saving is narrowly focused on the gear category as we endlessly obsess over and proudly herald our wt saving efforts regarding Ti cookware, a damn spork, carbon fiber trekking poles verse Al ones, the flimsiest lightest wt trail runners, Dyneema composite(Cuben Fiber), 1/4 oz lighter specialty fabric stuff sacks, wt of the groundsheet material, wt of the lightest tent stakes, wt of cordage/line, the 3 oz saved using a UL quilt....etc

    How many, - HOW MANY - get to their next water supply or resupply location still carrying unnecessary food or water weight? How many arrive at their destination THs at the completion of their hikes carrying unused food or water or fuel?


    Seems quite a few are obsessing over saving pennies while they're wiping their arses with Andrew Jacksons and Harriet Tubmans.

  12. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dogwood View Post

    How many, - HOW MANY - get to their next water supply or resupply location still carrying unnecessary food or water weight? How many arrive at their destination THs at the completion of their hikes carrying unused food or water or fuel?


    Seems quite a few are obsessing over saving pennies while they're wiping their arses with Andrew Jacksons and Harriet Tubmans.
    Much of this is just learned while you walk (assuming common sense) and doesn't require great preparation. You bought too much food for your first 3 days... so you buy less the next time. You notice the plentiful streams makes your 2l of water on your back seem silly.... you carry less.
    I typically arrive with no food & almost no water, but it depends on the variables. AT... not that many variables

    It's harder to correct stupid gear selections once you get to the trail. Or at least it's more expensive!
    I agree people obsess over every ounce, but when it adds up and you're carrying it for 6 months, it's worth inquiry (but not always worth big $$$)

  13. #33

    Default

    Consumable wt saving considerations and approaches do NOT have to be learned as one experiences backpacking for oneself just as gear wt saving considerations and approaches are often initiated well before a person ever camps or carries a kit. Learning and success doesn't have to always occur as result of personal trail and error experiences. They can occur if one is observant of the success and failures of others. This fast tracks successful consumable wt saving strategies.

  14. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-15-2013
    Location
    Illinois
    Age
    47
    Posts
    205

    Default

    I don't mean to hijack this thread, but can someone explain the pack liner idea to me? Is it as simple as putting a garbage bag in an empty backpack and then filling it up?

  15. #35
    Registered User Sandy of PA's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-10-2011
    Location
    Apollo, PA
    Age
    66
    Posts
    664
    Images
    2

    Default

    yes, when everything that has to stay dry is in there, you twist the top into an elephant trunk and tuck it down inside. Good to go!

  16. #36

    Default

    That's a lighweight kit. The only thing it is lacking is something fun. OK, maybe the Kindle...

    I made my pack light to compensate for my ham radio and Hasselblad SWC.

  17. #37

    Default

    One of my winter tasks will be a full listing and weighing of my gear, basically doing full packing for a trip.

    I'm lpoking to carry less weight, but am not finding a pack I want to use under 3 1/2 pounds.

  18. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-15-2015
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois
    Age
    38
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrickjd9 View Post
    One of my winter tasks will be a full listing and weighing of my gear, basically doing full packing for a trip.

    I'm lpoking to carry less weight, but am not finding a pack I want to use under 3 1/2 pounds.
    I just ordered a pack from Superior Wilderness Designs. They were able to make some small customization to it for minimal add on pricing (base is $200 or $250 for the 50L packs, depending on which fabric options you choose, and are 24 and 26oz respectively). I'm don't have pack in hand yet, but the customer service was stellar. May be worth checking out.

  19. #39
    Registered User One Half's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-05-2010
    Location
    in a bus
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,811

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TSWisla View Post
    I don't mean to hijack this thread, but can someone explain the pack liner idea to me? Is it as simple as putting a garbage bag in an empty backpack and then filling it up?
    a compactor bag is preferred or a contractors bag cut down a bit as they are rather large would work. not your ordinary kitchen garbage bag, they rip too easy.
    https://tinyurl.com/MyFDresults

    A vigorous five-mile walk will do more good for an unhappy but otherwise healthy adult than all the medicine and psychology in the world. ~Paul Dudley White

  20. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-25-2014
    Location
    Westchester County, NY
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    Another kind of pack liner bag that is light, durable and transparent is the Nylofume. These are a bit on the expensive side, but cheap as backpacking products go. The linked website is one that sells them in smaller quantities.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •