Originally Posted by
ScareBear
OK. So, let's be perfectly clear. YOUR data regarding MLD is bad for MLD. You are looking for like data. You wouldn't be looking for opposite data, because you could not draw any conclusions from conflicting data. Or, am I missing something here?
Also, you get some cred for being honest in your last post about what you are really up to. But, you lost it when I re-read your OP.
"This is just a curiosity of mine that I would like to analyze, so the more data the better!"
So, let's be perfectly clear here, shall we?
You are looking to write an article. You have MLD in your sights on weight issues. It isn't good for MLD. You initially utilized deceit in an effort to gather data for your article, but then got called out and fessed up.
I don't trust that anything you write will be any more accurate than your initial statement concerning your motivation for seeking the information. Here's a clue: Journalists/authors do not utilize deceit or obfuscation as a data gathering tool. G.I.G.O.