Originally Posted by
nsherry61
Personally, I don't think thru-hikers deserve any special trail cred. Okay, maybe trail cred, but not outdoor cred or life cred.
Thru hikers have walked away from the hard part of juggling life for an extended, relatively responsibility free walk along a well marked, well traveled trail with regular access to other people, comfortable amenities and food, and they generally do it in easy months for travel, skipping off the trail when the snow falls.
What's so special about a thru-hike?
To take it a bit further, what's special about a thru-hike of the AT, which of course is just a section hike of the international AT.
Or, what's so special about a thru-hike of the JMT, which is, of course, essentially a section hike of the PCT?
Was Andrew Skurka's Great Western Loop hike less than a thru hike because he finished where he started?
And frankly, I don't get this whole "section hiker" ID either. Is it a section hike when you do an overnight along a trail that other people hike the full length of? If I do a 3 month hike of 3/4 of the AT, does that make me a section hiker whereas two weeks on the JMT makes me a thru-hiker? Is there really any difference whatsoever at all then? . . . In which case, why is this even a conversation?