Pointing to a simplistic Utopian vision of Nature devoid of weather, need for sustenance, shelter, insects, etc was never espoused by Muir, Brown, or myself. We can esteem to re-connecting with Nature(going home as Muir said) with less or even no made in a factory gear by having awareness, skills, and techniques that are most useful most often. Without these, YES, LIFE with Nature is REALLY LIMITING. Even gear without these keys to compliment it is limiting. The most important part of - my kit - I bring into the Wilderness is between my ears. I'd always prefer to operate in knowledge and wisdom - with a wide skill set - rather than be solely dependent on the store bought doo-dads in my pack for survival and thriving. I'm alive today after experiencing many potentially fatal events NOT because of gear NOT because I was lucky but because of what I knew and the ability to apply that knowledge(wisdom), to not cede intellect and critical thinking and decision making ability to gear or electronics.
Store bought gear can actually interfere with connecting with Nature and oneself. That's what Tim Brown Jr taught. That's what Muir advocated.
Gear over reliance just as tech over reliance, which we can promote so loudly, as the U.S. sorely has learned from the 911 attacks, and the former Soviet Union learned in Afghanistan, can create a false sense of security, and be exploited as a weakness.
Because of the cultures you come it could very well be you see humanity separate from Nature, and likely above it. Nature is something which humanity owns to be constantly broken down into smaller and smaller parcels to which we vie for, not an integral part of Nature to which humanity belongs. As Muir said, "Most people are on the world, not in it -- have no conscious sympathy or relationship to anything about them -- undiffused, separate, and rigidly alone like marbles of polished stone, touching but separate."