Originally Posted by
Dogwood
"Ive decided I want to update my quilt and Im considering moving from the 20* to a 30* to save weight and space in my pack."
"It would save me around 10 oz and moving from an 800 fill to a 900 fill would save me space too."
A narrowed analysis bordering on making a stupid light decision - a narrowed decision based on saving wt and volume.
Yeah and moving from an 800fp down to a 900 fp down IN YOUR CURRENT 20* quilt also saves wt and volume. Possibly a different 20* quilt with lesser wt fabrics or maybe no zipper or shorter zipper or reducing some other added wt features saves more wt. What I'm getting at is your 20* quilt baseline isn't the most UL or least voluminous. It's common to make faulty comparisons doing this. There shouldn't be that great a wt savings - 10 oz - going from a 20* quilt to 30* quilt. There're other factors that aren't being shared in being able to save that much wt in only a 10* difference temp rated comparable quilt.
"I am indeed mostly a 3 season backpacker; rarely seeing anything below 20* if that."
"Has anyone made a similar transition and regretted it? The quilt I am looking at has awesome reviews in that folks say they've been able to take it past 30* easy and I plan on getting 1oz overstuff."
In 5 yrs of quilt use you've had to realize a quilt based sleep system's warmth and comfortability is dramatically influenced by the additional components in the sleep system and other aspects exampled by how one sleeps. Yet no mentioning it. This is important - significantly so - yet too often ignored in quilt based sleep system analysis in regards to saving wt, volume, $, complexity, modular compatibility, performance(warmth, sleeping comfort, warmth to wt ratios, etc). A quilt based sleep system is a modular based sleep system! Perceive it as such in arriving at answers to your questions.
When I read quilt reviewer's statements like "the quilt I am looking at has awesome reviews in that folks say they've been able to take it past 30*" the FIRST thing I want acknowledged and detailed is HOW that is being accomplished, under what set ups, in what typical usage, etc. With quilt based sleep systems, even more so than sleeping bag based sleep systems, the devil is in the details. *It easily leads to faulty and situationally questionable claims when analyzing a quilt based sleep system on the quilt component alone! This is observed being done even by highly evolved and knowledgeable hiking and gear review forums.
"Any feedback on experience making a similar transition would be apprecaited! Thanks folks."
LOL. YES! It would be very easy to come to my own stupid light sleep system decisions in a current revamping of my sleep system quiver if I made those decisions based largely or only on saving wt and volume outside of considering the entire sleep system and own needs and typical usage in different temp rating categories. FWIW, I'm currently seeking a sleep system temp rating for temps between 10-20* as probably my most utilized temp category rating in the quiver. I'm comparing a WM 10* Versalite, Katabatic 15* Sawatch, FF 20* UL Swallow, and a 10* ZP 3/4 zip hybrid quilt. Even with gram weenie ways I know the best decision I can come to has to take in factors beyond wt and volume.
It's analogous IMHO to taking anything out of context of a larger whole which is how in the field these pieces are normally used while making comparisons i.e.; isolating apparel piece performance/wt/etc in layering approaches(who just wears a shirt or rain jacket?), footwear(socks, footbeds/orthotics, gaiters, pants play a role), shelter systems(a shelter can also be a sleep or part of an apparel system), especially shelter systems using trekking poles or in hammock or bivy based shelters or tarp ponchos for example, food wt and bulk, etc. Isolation analysis and comparisons is certainly useful; do it. BUT, don't stop there.