WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    GA - Central PA 1977
    Join Date
    05-08-2005
    Location
    Baltimore,Maryland
    Age
    66
    Posts
    788
    Images
    15

    Default 30 year changes in thru`s

    I`ve read a number of threads in this section from thru or potential thru hikers which have me wondering some things...While I am not a "thru-hiker" I did do about half the trail in one trip and had 3 other month long hikes as well as many multi-week trips way way way back in the early-late 1970`s...After that my exposure to the trail dropped down to scattered day hikes but I did sell backpacking equipment full time (6 days a week) for 11 years and then health concerns and personal concerns pretty much cut me off from the hiking world for a long time..Now I`m slowly coming back into it and may even consider a thru hike once I retire..Now to my questions...

    I`ve seen a lot of threads about very low pack weights (As compared to what we normally carried 30 years ago) and have seen photos of hikers with very small looking packs including thru-hikers..Also talk of 4 days food being carried....My question basically is..Has technology changed that much that people can carry the same amount of equipment we did back then and yet have it be that much lighter and fit in that much smaller of a pack?...Or do people just carry less stuff and live rougher to save weight and increase speed?..I`ve written out a number of equipment check-lists of what I would have normally carried back in say 1975 on a month long trip and looking over various equipment websites I don`t see things being that much lighter or taking up that much less room.

    Perhaps some recent thru-hikers can share with me their typical equipment list..Minus food...But at the same time..4 days food supply?

  2. #2

    Default

    I'm no thru hiker, but I have hung around WB for a while- basically there are the essentials- then you cut the weight out of these essentials (including technology). You have a teeny little pack, so you can hike longer days, and thus hit towns more often for food resupplies.

    the basic categories would be:
    shelter - tarp instead of bombproof everest-ready tent, maybe a hammock
    sleeping - sleeping bag/quilt, down or some hightech poly fill
    eating- alcohol stoves made from pop cans, pots used only to boil water, freezer bag cooking. Or just go with cold food.
    safety:
    firstaid kit- how much are you actually going to need?
    flashlight- hello LEDs!
    etc etc.

    There are some loonies (oh, sorry guys) who drill holes in their toothbrushes, cut off the white bits on their maps, and use soap for toothpaste, but this is gram/ounce scrimping. Technology allows for the pounds to roll off.

    Also technology allows for greater compression of stuff.

    Yeah, it's a combination of factors- technology, living a little bit rougher and thus being able to hike more faster.

    check out the ultralight and homemade gear forums here at WB.

    titanium_hiker
    just call me TH
    woman with altitude

  3. #3
    Registered User Peaks's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    3,056

    Default How it was

    Let's see. 30 years ago, I was backpacking with a canvas backpack, wearing cotton and wool. I didn't filter water, and cooked over a fire. My flashlight probably used D cells. No goretex. Down sleeping bags were rated based on pounds of fill, but I probably used a rectangular cotton batting fill bag in warm weather. So, in 30 years, lots of changes in gear, and I probably carry a smaller pack now than then.

  4. #4
    Registered User The General's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-18-2005
    Location
    North Yorkshire England
    Age
    66
    Posts
    120

    Default

    If it aint Heavy you aint Hiking

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    11-09-2005
    Location
    State College, Pa
    Age
    78
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Don't worry about being lighter then 30 years ago. Let's see - 30 yrs. ago I weighed about 135lbs. - today I've got about 200lbs. to carry for two weeks and then I'll walk down to 175lbs.. The pack should start at -25lbs. and may increase for two weeks to zero pounds and I'll still be carring 40lbs. more then I did 30 years ago.

  6. #6
    Getting out as much as I can..which is never enough. :) Mags's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2004
    Location
    Colorado Plateau
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,002

    Default 1968 Gear List

    I have both volume of the Roledale Appalachian Trail books.

    In the list is a gear list for a thur-hike of the Appalachian Trail.

    His total weight of gear? 14 lbs.

    Also have another book at home with a gear list for a 1930's MATC outing. The gear list was about the same weight.


    Lightweight backpacking ain't anything new.
    Paul "Mags" Magnanti
    http://pmags.com
    Twitter: @pmagsco
    Facebook: pmagsblog

    The true harvest of my life is intangible...a little stardust caught,a portion of the rainbow I have clutched -Thoreau

  7. #7
    Livin' life in the drive thru! hikerjohnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-18-2004
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,149
    Images
    13

    Default

    thirty years ago, I was 4.
    So be it.
    --John

  8. #8
    Registered User neo's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-16-2004
    Location
    nashville,tn
    Age
    65
    Posts
    4,177
    Images
    337

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The General
    If it aint Heavy you aint Hiking



    well just keep on hiking heavy,i am going light neo

  9. #9
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    Well 30 years ago I was 9, but I was doing some hiking back then and some of my gear compared to today has changed. I really started backpacking when I was 12, so I can speak about how I and everyone around me seemed to pack back around 27 years ago.

    Back then I would use a stove with fuel that could weigh 2 pounds, now we go half that. Note that this isn't just alcohol, there are now stove like the Simmerlite and Pocket Rocket that can go pretty darn light and still have some heat.

    Back then I used a 5+ pound nylon A-Frame tent. Now you can get stuff about half that weight.

    Back then I had a 5 or so pound sleeping bag that doesn't compress as much as my sub 2 pound thing I carry now - and I am warmer than I was then.

    Back then my flashlight was a doubble D flashlight, now I have a AAA headlamp that works better since it is hands free and is a lot smaller and lighter.

    Back then I had a fairly large knife - now all I need is a small knife. Not, this isn't a gear evolution but just a change in how I use a knife.

    Back then I had a solid aluminum canteen strapped to the outside of my pack. Now I can carry a water bladder that weighs less and fits better inside my pack which takes up less space as I use the water.

    Back then I used an Army poncho, now my rain gear takes up less space.

    Back then I had never heard of using a sleeping pad, now I have one - so more space used.

    Back then I carried more canned foods and fresh foods. These days I use more easy to cook meals from the stores - less space and weight.

    Back then I carried more bulky clothing and cotton stuff - so more of it to have something dry to change into while the cotton attempted to dry. These days I carry less synthetic clothing and it takes up less space, compacts better, and I am at least as comfortable as I was back then if not more comfortable.

    Back then I carried a lot of spare things, these days I don't. I think that is more of a result of finding ways to do things differently. I can't say the same for others.

    Back then I hiked in boots and carried a spare pair of shoes for camp. These days I hike in the spare pair of shoes and leave the boots at home.

    Back then I carried a mess kit with fork, knife, and spoon. These days I just have the pot and the spoon. Funny thing is I should have figured it out back then - but then everyone I hiked with also did the same thing.

    Back then I used a 35mm camera with flash and telephoto lense for good shots plus extra film and batteries. These days I can use a 3mp digital camera with 512mb memory cards and a spare set of AAA.

    But now I also have a MP3 player - tunes I didn't have then. I also carry a book which I probably wouldn't have back then. I also keep a journal now. So in some ways I have more comfort and extra activities than I used to. I don't think I am less comfortable or have given anything up.

    I think in some ways the gear has gotten smaller and lighter, and in some ways it is just backpackers talking and finding out different ways to skin that cat.
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  10. #10
    Registered User Betsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-22-2006
    Location
    Salamanca, NY
    Age
    77
    Posts
    4

    Default

    I just did a short section hike on the AT and wish I had read this first. Took way too much gear. My daughter and I were both carrying around 45 to 50 lbs.. I will carry much less on my next weekend jaunt.

  11. #11
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default

    You have a teeny little pack, so you can hike longer days, and thus hit towns more often for food resupplies.
    Hey that's the Ray Jardine theory! But the average hiker on the AT back in the day pounded out many more miles per day with 10 days of food on thier backs than they do now with just a few (me thinks).

    Perhaps its because they didn't have to carry a water filter, IPod, Camera, Lekis, Bearbag, Pack Cover (Garbage bags worked fine),Thermarest, Thru hikers Companion, Glock, pocketmail, or cell phone? Not to mention camp shoes!

    Nah , it is because they were of stonger moral fibre!

    Seriously, I am thinking that an average thru hikers pack without food wasn't all that heavier way back when,than is the average hikers pack today.
    Last edited by rickb; 04-25-2006 at 20:07.

  12. #12
    GA - Central PA 1977
    Join Date
    05-08-2005
    Location
    Baltimore,Maryland
    Age
    66
    Posts
    788
    Images
    15

    Default

    Hey that`s a photo of the stove I carried way back when..The old sturdy SVEA 123..Could drop kick it down a mountain and fire it right up!

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •