WhiteBlaze hiking shirts fall 2006

**Skidsteer** · 08-02-2006, 17:35

New logo on either the left breast or the sleeve...or both.

**SteveJ** · 08-02-2006, 17:57

I agree with the contrarian idea of the new logo on the sleeve - put me in for 2 XLs!

**Big Guy** · 08-02-2006, 20:46

Count me in for a 2x. I prefer on the shoulder. Great new logo. Great Job Troll.
I wear m first shirt a lot but not while hiking. It is my about town shirt.

**MistressJenkins** · 08-02-2006, 21:16

Originally Posted by frieden

I would think the sleeve would be the logical place, because of the backpack straps.

Sleeve sounds great... it would go great with my pack!!!

**Frolicking Dinosaurs** · 08-02-2006, 21:28

Two large shirts for the dinos. I love the new logo and would prefer the shirt have that on the sleeve or breast.

**SGT Rock** · 08-02-2006, 21:28

Sleeve. Pack straps covering it up just make no sense. Why have a logo if you can't see it?

**Almost There** · 08-02-2006, 21:36

I vote new logo on sleeve, I'd take a XXL

**white rabbit** · 08-02-2006, 22:04

New logo on sleeve. I'll order two large when they are available.

**TJ aka Teej** · 08-02-2006, 22:10

On the sleeve on an XXL, please. Like the new logo, almost makes WB seem legit

**Ewker** · 08-02-2006, 22:10

I will take 2 XXL

**attroll** · 08-03-2006, 01:14

Originally Posted by frieden

I would think the sleeve would be the logical place, because of the backpack straps.

That is why we have put them on the left sleeve in the past. I don't know how the new logo would look on the left sleeve though. I guess I would have to get a sample done of it and see. But I think it would look weird because it would be a square logo and because the space ratio. But I could be wrong.

**dixicritter** · 08-03-2006, 07:20

Originally Posted by attroll

That is why we have put them on the left sleeve in the past. I don't know how the new logo would look on the left sleeve though. I guess I would have to get a sample done of it and see. But I think it would look weird because it would be a square logo and because the space ratio. But I could be wrong.

Well if you look at what the military puts on the sleeves of the uniforms as far as unit patches go they are all different shapes and sizes. So I think it would be just fine Troll. Maybe it could be placed like a unit patch and be just fine, I can't remember how the other logo was positioned or where Rock's shirt is to go look at it right now. LOL.

Oh I'd vote for sleeve too, btw.

**scope** · 08-03-2006, 07:30

Originally Posted by attroll

That is why we have put them on the left sleeve in the past. I don't know how the new logo would look on the left sleeve though. I guess I would have to get a sample done of it and see. But I think it would look weird because it would be a square logo and because the space ratio. But I could be wrong.

I would go for sleeve unless as you say, it might not look right. If not, how about the middle of the chest? Many mfrs, adidas, puma, etc., are putting their logos there now.

We can adjust our chest straps to show it off, right?!

Oh, and I'd love to have the long sleeve option since it seems long sleeve wicking shirts are hard to come by.

**Frosty** · 08-03-2006, 08:59

Originally Posted by attroll

I did not realize I put the word pocket in the first post. What I meant to say on the left breast pocket area. There will be no pockets. It will be the same shirt I used before with no pockets.

Too bad. A breast pocket would be a great place to keep a cell phone handy for easy conversing on the trail....

**Frosty** · 08-03-2006, 09:01

Originally Posted by Doctari

As usual, I'll take 2, Xtra large (Wish I still took a large, SIGH!).

Huh. Wish Xtra large still fit me...

**Cuffs** · 08-03-2006, 09:44

Ok, I like the sleeve idea, but Troll's thoughts on its "oddness" got me to thinking...

1. I dont think that shape would be out of place on the sleeve.

2. I DO think that if the logo goes on the left sleeve, it will look odd as the hiker will be going "backwards" and not "forward" as if moving on down the trail (in the same direction as the wearer....)

**Cuffs** · 08-03-2006, 09:45

I should have added if the logo goes on the left sleeve the logo hiker will be going "backwards" and if placed on the right sleeve it will be going "forward."

**chomp** · 08-03-2006, 09:56

Wow, the new logo looks AWESOME! It really kicks some serious ass - nice work. I will take a couple for sure. BTW - for anyone that doesn't have one, these shirts are seriously awesome.

I'd vote for making the logo a bit bigger and putting it dead center on the shirt. I don't think that the new logo would look good at all on the sleeve, and there is the problem of the strap covering up the logo on the left.

But I bet that the new logo would look really great if you made it larger and put is smack in the middle of the shirt.

**jollies** · 08-03-2006, 11:54

Why not put the logo on BOTH sleeves? That way if someone is passing you on the trail on either the left or right they can see all of the Whiteblaze glory! I don't think that the breast of the shirt is a bad idea either. If the logo goes in multiple places, it doesn't matter if it is covered up while hiking, does it? Why not do a combination of the website logo and the new logo? You don't always have a pack on your back, you know :-)

**attroll** · 08-03-2006, 13:07

Ok, now the questions.

1. If I do put it on the sleeve what size do you think it should be? Would 3" x 3" be to big or should I go smaller. I will look into getting some samples done maybe this weekend, but I can not promise anything.

2. If I put it on the left breast area what size should it be?

3. If I put it in the middle of the shirt what size should it be?

Poll: Where would you like the logo on the WhiteBlaze hiking shirt?

Thread: WhiteBlaze hiking shirts fall 2006

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Sleeve

middle breast?

Sleeve(s)

Posting Permissions