In another thread someone mentioned that he doesn't consider his heavy-ish (3/4 pound) camera as counting towards pack weight since he carries it in his pocket.
Not trying to criticise that hiker at all here. Was just musing on the differing philosophies/rationalizations that must come into play with what we hikers consider "pack weight".
I always thought that I included everything that I'm not actually wearing to be "pack weight". But then I think about my Leki's, I carry them in my hands usually, but occasionally they ride on my pack. I consider them separate from pack weight, I suppose. But why? And why not include all clothing, boots, etc? They're still items my body will be carrying...
On the flip side, even though I often carry maps, guidebooks, snacks, etc in my pockets, they are always included as pack weight. If I take my Swiss Army Knife out of my pack and put in in my pocket, it's still "pack weight" IMO.
The bottom line of course is that every ounce and gram of stuff your legs are hauling up and down the trail is gear weight, weddings rings and eyeglasses included. No question here exactly, just wondering how often we sometimes tend to minimize in our minds how much we are actually carrying...or maybe I'm the only one?