WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    ME => GA 19AT3 rickb's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-12-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    7,145
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    1

    Default Benedict Arnold and Carry Ponds

    I forget if there is an "Arnold" trail which crosses the AT around the Bigalows (Maine) or if there is a plaque or just a mention in a guide book, but I think most thru hikers are aware somehow that Benedic Arnold and his men passed through those mountain before them.

    Here is link talking about Arnold's Expedition written by a past president of the MATC. The link has some intersting pictures if you give them time to load, and comments on how Carry Ponds and the Great Carrying Place got their names.

    http://www.pressherald.com/news/stat...27arnold.shtml

  2. #2

    Default

    It's damn hard to pack light when you're pushing cannons through swamps.

  3. #3
    LT '79; AT '73-'14 in sections; Donating Member Kerosene's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Age
    67
    Posts
    5,446
    Images
    558

    Default

    And they had to use cast iron instead of titanium for those cannon!

  4. #4

    Default

    Maybe bronze...I'm not certain what the British were using at the time. Bewcause of the nature of cast iron, cannons made from cast iron either needed to be heavier than a bronze cannon of the same caliber or had to be of a smaller caliber and shorter range for the same weight. The French made very good cannon at the time, and used bronze most of the time.
    Andrew "Iceman" Priestley
    AT'95, GA>ME

    Non nobis Domine, non nobis sed Nomini Tuo da Gloriam
    Not for us O Lord, not for us but in Your Name is the Glory

  5. #5

    :banana

    Quote Originally Posted by icemanat95
    Maybe bronze...I'm not certain what the British were using at the time. Bewcause of the nature of cast iron, cannons made from cast iron either needed to be heavier than a bronze cannon of the same caliber or had to be of a smaller caliber and shorter range for the same weight. The French made very good cannon at the time, and used bronze most of the time.
    Wow, that means they had Golite Cannons. I'm sure they were much easier to drag through the woods and swamps. I wonder if they used trekking poles and Aquamira.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    08-07-2003
    Location
    Nashville, Tennessee
    Age
    72
    Posts
    6,119
    Images
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Jay
    Wow, that means they had Golite Cannons. I'm sure they were much easier to drag through the woods and swamps. I wonder if they used trekking poles and Aquamira.
    Well, they did use preserved, processed foods in lightweight (LOL) cans. Napolean had sealed, Pasteurized canned food invented for his army, as I recall.

    Sadly, I think they sealed the cans with lead solder, which leached lead into their food.

    Rain Man

  7. #7
    Registered User Dances with Mice's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-20-2003
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    3,974
    Images
    147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rain Man
    Well, they did use preserved, processed foods in lightweight (LOL) cans. Napolean had sealed, Pasteurized canned food invented for his army, as I recall.

    Sadly, I think they sealed the cans with lead solder, which leached lead into their food.

    Rain Man

    Arnold achieved significant military advantage by moving through an area that the enemy assumed was impenetrable. Today Army Rangers strive to achieve the same level of surprise by exactly the same technique, and their mountain maneuvre training ground is still on the AT but much further south, roughly between 3 Forks and Hightower Gap. It's not uncommon for Hawk Mtn. shelter campers to be rushed by a patrol of Ranger trainees, I've been there when that happened. The battles in Afghanistan (remember Afghanistan?) were won on the training fields of Georgia.

    The average life expectancy of Napoleanic soldiers was significantly reduced by lead, that's true. But not the lead in their food. If given the choice, they would have preferred to live long enough to die by lead poisoning rather than by airborne lead induced trauma. Prior to Pasteur's work more soldiers were probably killed by their own cooks than by enemy artillery. And, in a desperate attempt to segue back to AT relevancy, more hikes have probably been delayed or eneded by improper hand washing than by improper water treatment.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •