WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 25 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 481
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-01-2007
    Location
    Nashville, Tenn.
    Age
    53
    Posts
    20

    Default Regulating thru-hikers

    Every spring a great glob of thru-hikers goes through the Smokies. They make things miserable for everyone and, as a group, probably cause the largest negative impact to the Smokies in any given year. Here is my solution: restrict the number of thru-hikers allowed into the park each day. I suggest 12 as a good number. You could let four go to Mollies, four to Russell and four to Spence, and that's it each day. You greatly lessen the impact by spreading everybody out. You could park a ridgerunner down at the Fontana entrance to hand out permits. This is a great idea, right?

  2. #2

    Default

    Excellent. The gestapo wants in on the trail. Excellent idea eh? UUUGGGHHH.
    Mabye try screenname BlackJournalist.

  3. #3

    Default 'Permit' me to comment

    About as great an idea as selling appointment calendars to prisoners assigned to solitary confinement.
    Warren Doyle PhD
    34,000-miler (and counting)
    [email protected]
    www.warrendoyle.com

  4. #4
    I'm the man on the mountain, come on up.....
    Join Date
    05-27-2006
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    979
    Images
    1

    Default

    i would think car campers and weekenders leave more of an impact than thru hikers....all things reconsidered

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warren doyle View Post
    About as great an idea as selling appointment calendars to prisoners assigned to solitary confinement.
    Maybe there should be rotating counter gates all along the trail that lock when the quota has been met for the day. And maybe hiker hunters that shoot when they deem we've overpopulated the ecosystem. Then Blackjournalist will have created a story to write.

  6. #6
    A friend 2 all notorius tic's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-25-2007
    Location
    Bradenton Beach, Florida, United States
    Age
    49
    Posts
    279
    Images
    38

    Default

    This my land this is your land? I think you might have missed that lesson in uuuuuummmm. elem. They already try to push faster than some like to hike through that section. I was there during the north eastern this year and it was cold. Ten miles a day was about anyone could do. And they do make us check in (register). And as far as impact we are probabley the least offensive to the trail<:. And really during that time of the year you do not see to many day or section hikers.. But thanks for your input.. It gives me something to think about the next time i run into a journalst on the trail... Peace Notorius TIC

  7. #7
    Registered User Frolicking Dinosaurs's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-25-2005
    Location
    Frolicking elsewhere
    Posts
    12,398
    Images
    15

    Default

    ::: Dino seen putting on asbestos base layer :::

    Limiting the number of thru-hikers entering the GSMNP might be a workable idea. I'm thinking more like 12 to 15 per day than 4, however. It would encourage people to use the so-to-be-official alternate route of the BMT which would spread the hikers out more . I'd really like to see the BMT route become the official AT route and the way-too-overused GSMNP route become the alternate.

  8. #8

    Default

    Hopefully hikers will start following SGT Rock's lead and hike the BMT in the park on their way to Maine. It's arguably a prettier part of the park. That would alleviate some of the problems with crowding and human waste by dispersing it.

  9. #9
    Peakbagger Extraordinaire The Solemates's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-30-2003
    Location
    Appalachian Ohio
    Posts
    4,406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freeleo View Post
    i would think car campers and weekenders leave more of an impact than thru hikers....all things reconsidered
    while i dont necessarily agree with journalist's solution, his observations are right on target. i would disagree with freeleo here though. thru-hikers typically have a larger negative impact to the trail than do car campers: in the smokies this may or may not be easily evident, but obviously the smokies are not the only area impacted. northern GA is hit the hardest, and its all because of disrepectful thru hikers. I've hiked GA 3 times now after the main season of hikers goes thru and their impact is astounding. The GA trail clubs really do an excellent job of cleaning up the mess and preserving the trail. thanks to all the hard workers!
    The only thing better than mountains, is mountains where you haven't been.

    amongnature.blogspot.com

  10. #10
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frolicking Dinosaurs View Post
    ::: Dino seen putting on asbestos base layer :::




    Limiting the number of thru-hikers entering the GSMNP might be a workable idea. I'm thinking more like 12 to 15 per day than 4, however. It would encourage people to use the so-to-be-official alternate route of the BMT which would spread the hikers out more . I'd really like to see the BMT route become the official AT route and the way-too-overused GSMNP route become the alternate.
    Quote Originally Posted by MOWGLI16 View Post
    Hopefully hikers will start following SGT Rock's lead and hike the BMT in the park on their way to Maine. It's arguably a prettier part of the park. That would alleviate some of the problems with crowding and human waste by dispersing it.
    I was thinking the same thing. I'm not Infantry, but I am a Scout, so in this case I'll use the Infantry motto:

    "Follow Me!"
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  11. #11

    Default

    Note to Journalist:

    You really think thru-hikers create more of a negative impact in the park?

    Well I don't think so. They don't litter as a rule; they bury their waste properly; they don't pollute or abuse water sources; they don't degrade Trails by horseback riding, and so on.

    As for "making things miserable" for everyone else, well I've seen thru-hikers share food, clothing and first-aid with ill-equipped weekenders and school groups. Is this what you mean by making other hikers miserable?

    In short, I think your comments and tone are pevish and mean-spirited.

    And instead of regulating how many can stay at each shelter, it'd make more sense to let thru-hikers camp elsewhere. Then the shelters wouldn't be crowded with them, and sensitive souls like Journalist would have to find something else to complain about.

  12. #12
    Registered User LIhikers's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-2004
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Age
    71
    Posts
    2,269
    Images
    1

    Default

    And what would happen to the hikers who wanted to get into the park but couldn't because of the quota? Would they have to form a line, and camp at the permit office and just wait until it was their turn or would there be a holding pattern for them to hike?

  13. #13
    I'm the man on the mountain, come on up.....
    Join Date
    05-27-2006
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    979
    Images
    1

    Default

    its like tee times in golf....how far in advance could you schedule a send off time

  14. #14
    Registered User Frolicking Dinosaurs's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-25-2005
    Location
    Frolicking elsewhere
    Posts
    12,398
    Images
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LIhikers View Post
    And what would happen to the hikers who wanted to get into the park but couldn't because of the quota? Would they have to form a line, and camp at the permit office and just wait until it was their turn or would there be a holding pattern for them to hike?
    My guess is most would opt to hike the BMT instead of waiting and this would be a good thing. The AT in GSMNP is currently receiving far too much use for the good of the park, trail or the ecosystems near the trail. Anything that would slow down the traffic would be a step in the right direction IMO YMMV

  15. #15
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    Get rid of the whole "must walk every mile of the AT" thing and start promoting blue blazing. The Smokies are full of great trails - no need to be all shoe-horned into just one.
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  16. #16
    Registered User Frolicking Dinosaurs's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-25-2005
    Location
    Frolicking elsewhere
    Posts
    12,398
    Images
    15

    Default

    Is there a similar problem in the SNP or has the hoard thinned out enough by then to not be as much of a problem?

  17. #17

    Default

    Check out GSMNP and the AT in mid summer. Thru hikers do cause some impact but nothing like the general public does!

    geek

  18. #18
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    Absolutly.

    But if you hike the Smokies on the AT outside of thru-hiking season you can pretty much have the trail to yourself. The thru-hikers in the Smokies do tend to clog up a system that has limited spaces based on the current system.
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  19. #19
    Some days, it's not worth chewing through the restraints.
    Join Date
    12-13-2004
    Location
    Central Vermont
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,665

    Default

    Journalist:

    According to the ATC website, roughly 1,000 thru-hikers get to Fontana Dam each year.

    According to the National Park Service, GSMNP is the most-visited park in the country, with 9 million visitors annually.

    Boy, those thru-hikers really get in the way, huh, you pack-sniffer.

    http://www.appalachiantrail.org/site...Statistics.htm

    http://www.nps.gov/grsm/parkmgmt/statistics.htm

  20. #20
    Some days, it's not worth chewing through the restraints.
    Join Date
    12-13-2004
    Location
    Central Vermont
    Age
    68
    Posts
    2,665

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SGT Rock View Post
    Get rid of the whole "must walk every mile of the AT" thing and start promoting blue blazing. The Smokies are full of great trails - no need to be all shoe-horned into just one.
    Gotta agree with that - if you can walk from Georgia to Maine or vice-versa, white blazes or blue blazes are no different. Just no yellow-blazes!

Page 1 of 25 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •