WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Default Bill to protect trail advances - Philadelphia Inquirer


    Bill to protect trail advances
    Philadelphia Inquirer, PA - 36 minutes ago
    By Diane Mastrull A bill that would require Pennsylvania towns along the Appalachian Trail to enact zoning to protect land abutting the historic footpath ...


    More...

  2. #2

    Default Bill preserves Appalachian Trail - PoconoNews.net


    PoconoNews.net

    Bill preserves Appalachian Trail
    PoconoNews.net, New York - 5 minutes ago
    HARRISBURG - Legislation requiring municipalities that border the Appalachian Trail to adopt ordinances protecting the trail has been approved and now goes ...


    More...

  3. #3

    Default Pa HB 1281

    The following is summary of the reasons for proposing it, courtesy of its primary sponsor, Rep. Bob Freeman.

    The legislature enacted legislation back in 1978 calling upon municipalities that border the Appalachian Trail to preserve the natural scenic, historic and esthetic values of the trail, but there was no requirement for them to pass land-use ordinances to enforce that,” Rep. Freeman said. “My legislation will have these bordering municipalities put in place zoning and other land-use measures necessary to preserve those values.” Rep. Freeman said the legislation was suggested by Easton environmental attorney Charles “Chot” Elliott. It resulted following the loss of ATC’s appeal to the state appellate court of a lower court ruling in Monroe County where a developer proposed constructing a private automobile racing club, known as the Alpine Rose.
    Chot worked with law student James Y. Miles at Temple University to discern the weaknesses in the lawsuit brought by the Appalachian Trail Conservancy and Blue Mountain Preservation Association under the Commonwealth’s 1978 Appalachian Trail Act (P.L. 87 No. 41). In an unpublished J.D. thesis, Miles found that townships have split loyalties between economic development and environmental protection even as the latter is required by the Commonwealth’s constitution. “The question remains regarding whether those entities charged with the public trust have been loyal, or are capable of being loyal, to the express policy of the Trail Act.” The study holds promise for all progressive states with constitutions guaranteeing citizen rights to clean water, air and natural environments. The proposed amendment, underlined at House Bill 1281, will hopefully ensure adequate land-use zoning among the fifty-plus townships crossed by the A.T. in Pennsylvania.



    A copy of the Bill itself can be found here. http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/...r=1281&pn=3767
    Early Bird 2007

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    07-19-2007
    Location
    Hummelstown & Tioga, PA
    Posts
    2,465

    Default

    EB07 - Will this bill help the monster warehouses or the White Rocks Ridge?

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ki0eh View Post
    EB07 - Will this bill help the monster warehouses or the White Rocks Ridge?
    I think it will help some. The law (assuming the Governor signs the Bill) will require municipalities to pass land use ordinances that will promote the preservation of the Trail itself as well as its viewshed. However, the elected leaders of municipalities are still subject to the wishes of the people who elect them. When we learn of a development, warehouse, etc. that threatens the trail, we need to express our views forcefully.
    Early Bird 2007

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-08-2005
    Location
    By the tall marsh grass.
    Posts
    1,485

    Default

    As unpopular as this will translate, The federal government should mind it's own business.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •