When you say "taken" do you mean via hunting and weighed in at 400 lbs?
while i'm no expert, these two look like they could be in the 300-400lb range
http://www.whiteblaze.net/forum/vbg/...?i=17303&c=548
http://www.whiteblaze.net/forum/vbg/...?i=17265&c=548
[COLOR="Blue"]Hokey Pokey [/COLOR]
probably lighter than 400, maybe closer to 300.
but i don't understand why the AT wouldn't have 400lb and upward bears.
I guess everything is bigger & better in the west...
I've always thought that SNP would have some 500lbs in there. All they do is eat and watch us hikers walk by. Never hunted. Just eat and eat and live to an old age.
There was a bear shot in either Rappahannak or Culpeper Co next to SNP last year that weighed over 700 lbs if my memory serves me right. I tried searching for it but couldn't come up with anything.
[COLOR="Blue"]Hokey Pokey [/COLOR]
i've done some more research... they just don't exist. apparently, once AT bears hit the 400-pound mark, they retire and move out west or to alaska. and when the AT is relocated in sections, all the 400+ bears move elsewhere to accommodate. there's just something about that narrow, 2100-mile corridor through prime bear country (half of which is protected from hunters) ... they wont touch it. i'm being told that biologists are baffled.
A ranger in Glacier said the average grizzly in that park is 300 lbs, which is the same weight as a full-grown mountain goat.
I was surprised. That bit of information leads me to conclude that, while there are occasional huge individuals, most of the bears are not all that big.
If not NOW, then WHEN?
ME>GA 2006
http://www.trailjournals.com/entry.cfm?trailname=3277
Instagram hiking photos: five.leafed.clover
Hard to believe. Sad to say but rangers don't always have up to date info.
Size of average adult
- weight: male = 300 - 860 pounds; female = 205 - 455 pounds
http://www.scz.org/animals/b/grizzly.html
Bears do not know if they are on the Appalachian Trail or some other trail.
Please,show me 1 pic from all members ,old or new of a 400lb on the A.T.? SIMPLE.
oooo... check out this big nama jama...
http://whiteblaze.net/forum/vbg/showimage.php?i=17964
..posted by john gault
unfortunately john couldn't get him to pose on the scales for us. but slow's rule of AT Black Bear size limits says it def' can't be over 400lbs. maybe right at 400, but that's it.
sorry for all the sarcasm, but i did offer some facts in the first place. your original comment was that black bears "on the AT" "are KID'S to the west and A.K." there are plenty of examples of large bears found in and around the Appalachian Mountains. while i realize that 400lb+ black bears are rare, there isn't any reason to suggest that appalachian black bears are inherently smaller than their western U.S. counterparts (except perhaps that they get more exercise 'cause there are more people to run away from). as for your insistence that bears within eyeshot of the AT can't also be larger than average ... you need to explain your logic here because it doesn't make sense.
a bear's size depends on its diet, the season, age and sex ... period. it doesn't depend on its east-west orientation (or its proximity to some hiking trail).
ugh! why am i still talking about this!?
indentifying bear scat. Likely not new to all, but funny nonetheless.
"I think we broke his brain."