From:
http://www.thru-hiker.com/articles/d...ware_myths.php
"Debunking Cookware Myths
I'm a born skeptic. When I read people making claims on internet message boards regarding the performance or failure of their gear, I duplicate the experiment to either confirm or refute their results. This article reports on an experiment I ran to determine if people's claims that there is a significant difference between boil times and fuel consumption for the three common cookware materials get the [profanely bogus] award. Pots tested:
Experimental: A large basin of water was set out and allowed to equilibrate with room temperature (72 degrees Fahrenheit). Two cups of water were transferred to each of the pots using a cooking grade measuring cup. The boiling point at my altitude was determined to be 212 degrees F. A Primus Alpine Titanium canister stove was used to heat the water to boiling as determined by the temperature probe (see sidebar for details of temperature data collection). The probe was suspended in the center of each pot so that the sensor was about one centimeter below the surface of the water. The weight of the canister after heating the water to a boil was subtracted from the weight of the canister before to determine the mass of fuel used. The time to reach a 212 degree boil was recorded in seconds. In each case the initial starting temperature of the water was 72 degrees F and final was 212 degrees F.
- MSR Titan kettle (titanium)
- MSR Stowaway (stainless steel)
- Camping Gaz (Bluet) aluminum
- generic stainless steel 2 L pot
Results:
Material/ Fuel weight consumed/ Time to reach a full, rolling boil (212 degrees F)
MSR Stowaway stainless steel 0.3 oz 2 min 38 seconds
Generic stainless steel 0.3 oz 2 min 22 seconds
Blue aluminum 0.3 oz 2 min 33 seconds
MSR Titantitanium 0.3 oz 2 min 34 seconds
Conclusion: Even though aluminum, stainless steel, and titanium have different heat transfer properties, no significant differences were observed for boiling times and fuel consumption between the different materials for the pots tested and stove used. Unsubstantiated claims to the contrary receive (fanfare & cheering) the [profanely bogus] award.
Weight, cost, and design should be at the forefront of your cookware research. Another equally important conclusion you should consider is that well-meaning people often spread misinformation on internet message boards with regard to the performance or drawbacks of gear."