It's time. There's a 300 pound elephant in our living room, and everyone's avoiding mentioning him. And it's a needful discussion. Let's keep it fairly civil, though; strong opinions don't have to be stated offensively....Here it goes:
What is your feeling about "A Walk in the Woods", by Bill Bryson? If you haven't read it, you'll hear a lot in following posts, I suspect, and you should if only to understand what we're talking about.
A lot of people dislike Bryson, for a lot of reasons. He didn't hike the whole AT, he exaggerated wildly (to be charitable about it) and got a lot of information incorrect. He mocked a fair number of types of people, especially "gearheads", and had some pretty pointed opinions about others that were clearly stated, even if they weren't welcomed by the targets.
Still, Bryson's book was the reason I started the AT in '00, and as a result fell in love with this wonderful, strange, boring, exciting, unusual, repetitive rut through a green tunnel (summer) and through snowbanks (winter). It started when my daughter gave me a copy. "Dad, you've always said you wanted to walk this trail. This book is pretty funny, maybe it will help you decide." I read it, and found that he was a travel writer (and not a hiker) much like Mark Twain was as a travel writer ("Innocents Abroad", "Roughing It" and a lot more). Twain, also, made a lot of fun of targets that didn't necessarily like it, exaggerated wildly (that bullfrog incident may not have exactly have happened as he relates it), and wrote scathingly of people and groups who maybe he shouldn't have taken on. But they're still great books.
I enjoyed it. I discounted a lot of what he said, wondered about the accuracy of other parts (to my regret, I didn't find a lot of gear thrown by the sides of the Springer approach), and ended up feeling that, despite it all, he'd made me want to walk this Trail. So despite its faults, I'm grateful to him for what he led me to do.
OK, folks. Other opinions?