WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Food Volume

  1. #1

    Default Food Volume

    We've heard of the weight-per-day rule of thumb for food consumed on the trail (either 1 1/2 or 2 lb's), but how about the volume? How many cubic inches should I plan on packing for a 5 day food drop at 2 lbs per day?

  2. #2
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    I have a 10"x21" food bag that would just about be full for 5 days of food, but not quite totally full. 10x21x3.14 would be 659 cubic inches if I figured that correctly.
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SGT Rock
    I have a 10"x21" food bag that would just about be full for 5 days of food, but not quite totally full. 10x21x3.14 would be 659 cubic inches if I figured that correctly.

    Happy to see you back, Sarge. By the way, which is worse: a Baghdad summer or Louisiana summer (assuming no air conditioning)?

    A 10 inch diameter, 21 inch long bag would have ~ 1650 cu in. pi*r²*l.

  4. #4

    Default

    No, Sgt Rock's right at 659 cu. in. Volume is pi*d*l. Sqauring the radius and multiplying gives you surface area.

    When I was consuming maximum calories on my thru-hike, my food bag was often stuffed full for 4-5 days and I had bagels and a jar of peanut butter stuffed in the pack elsewhere. My bag is 9x15, which is 424 cu. in. plus another couple hundred cu. in. for the jar and bagels.

    Incorrect formula here; see posts below
    Last edited by Moon Monster; 04-22-2004 at 09:31.

  5. #5
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    Baghdad summers seem worse, absolutly no shade at all and flak vests may make it seem worse than it really was, but 150 is going to suck no matter what.
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moon Monster
    No, Sgt Rock's right at 659 cu. in. Volume is pi*d*l. Sqauring the radius and multiplying gives you surface area.

    When I was consuming maximum calories on my thru-hike, my food bag was often stuffed full for 4-5 days and I had bagels and a jar of peanut butter stuffed in the pack elsewhere. My bag is 9x15, which is 424 cu. in. plus another couple hundred cu. in. for the jar and bagels.
    Not so. Pi is a constant. To get cubic inches you multiply in. x in. x in. Multiplying the surface area of a 10 inch circle pi x r² times the length of the bag will give the volume of a cylinder. Your calculation is square inches of something. If it were a 10 inch by 10 inch (square ends) by 21 inch container then the volume would be 2100 cu in. You could find the volume of an inscribed circular sac by multiplying this by 3.1/4. Multiply by .75 to estimate or for government work.

  7. #7

    Default

    Aha, you are correct Groucho. Upon re-doing the calculations, Sgt Rock's bag is 1650 cu.in. and my food bag is 954 cu.in. which makes since as it appears to fill 1/4 to 1/3 of my 3200 cu.in. pack when full. Altogether, I may max out at 12-1300 cu.in. of food (and packaging) for 5 days.

  8. #8
    First Sergeant SGT Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-03-2002
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Age
    57
    Posts
    14,861
    Images
    248

    Default

    OK, I'll agree with that. Like I said, my food bag is not all the way full, and inside it usually goes my kitchen stuff as well, so 1200-1300 ci of pack space may be right. I haven't done geometry in about 20 years so insead of Pi*r2*l I was doing Pi*2r*l, so instead of squaring the radus, I was doubling it which was my error.
    SGT Rock
    http://hikinghq.net

    My 2008 Trail Journal of the BMT/AT

    BMT Thru-Hikers' Guide
    -----------------------------------------

    NO SNIVELING

  9. #9
    Registered User Peaks's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2002
    Location
    Marlboro, MA
    Posts
    3,056

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by charlottebronte
    We've heard of the weight-per-day rule of thumb for food consumed on the trail (either 1 1/2 or 2 lb's), but how about the volume? How many cubic inches should I plan on packing for a 5 day food drop at 2 lbs per day?
    Well, I've never figured out food based on volume. But I know that I can put about 5 to 6 days of food in an 8 x 18 stuff sack.

  10. #10
    Donating Member/AT Class of 2003 - The WET year
    Join Date
    09-27-2002
    Location
    Laramie, WY
    Age
    74
    Posts
    7,149
    Images
    90

    Default Food Volume

    Actual "volume" of food carried depends a lot on your choice of foods. Once my diet somewhat leveled off on the trail last year I was able to get 4 days worth of food in a 7" x 15" silnylon stuff sack. That sack, when full, averaged around 9 pounds.

    Like I said ...volume changes based on your food selections and the degree to which you "repackage" your foods before stuffing them in your food bag.

    Hope that helps ...

    'Slogger
    The more I learn ...the more I realize I don't know.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SGT Rock
    OK, I'll agree with that. Like I said, my food bag is not all the way full, and inside it usually goes my kitchen stuff as well, so 1200-1300 ci of pack space may be right. I haven't done geometry in about 20 years so insead of Pi*r2*l I was doing Pi*2r*l, so instead of squaring the radus, I was doubling it which was my error.

    I did worse a couple of weeks ago; cursed myself all the way back to the store.

    Just didn't want charlottebrontė to buy by cubic inches and end up with too small a bag.

    Actually, when doing the calculation you could subtract the radius of the bag from the length (because of the drawstring at top) and get a better approximation.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •