WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 46
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-13-2007
    Location
    grand prairie,tx
    Age
    69
    Posts
    41

    Default Hking in Sandals

    I plan to hike 800 miles of the AT in sandals..any thoughts?
    Semper Fi

  2. #2

    Default

    One my June section from Wayah Gap to Amicaloa I ran into a young guy just north of Neel Gap sporting a brand new pair of trail runners purchased at Mtn Crossings, the sandals he started at Amicaloa with were on the way home, YMMV. He stated they had chewed his feet up badly enough it was causing him lots of problems.

  3. #3
    Registered User jrnj5k's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-13-2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    39
    Posts
    389
    Images
    11

    Default

    go for it, lots of reasons to do it ie: ventilation, water drainage ability, light weight. i would get used to it by training in them first to see if its for you because its not for everyone.

  4. #4
    So many trails... so little time. Many Walks's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-23-2007
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    615

    Default

    Just be sure you hike in something like Keen's or a similar type with good toe protection. You'll be kicking rocks along the way. Socks are optional as to your preference.
    That man is the richest whose pleasures are the cheapest. Henry David Thoreau

  5. #5

    Default

    Sandals have their own unique problems, but my own cost/benefit analysis weighs on the side of hiking in sandals.
    Cons: Stubbed toes --doesn't happen as often as you would think. My last hike I stubbed my toe twice in GA and not after that.
    Cracking feet --a definite problem. Moisturizer, oil or vaseline are a must.
    Cold --socks.
    Ankle support --my belief is that the ankle support from boots is overrated. I think the popularity of trail runners strengthens that point.

    Pros: Comfort
    No need to carry camp shoes
    Rain is so much less of a hassle. In fact, hiking in sandals in the rain provides a perverse sense of fun. Puddle-jumping is fun. This aspect of hiking in sandals is so underrated. Hiking in wet shoes/boots sucks.

    You can always start out in sandals and if it is not for you pick up a pair of kicks from Payless or Walmart to get you home.
    Yahtzee

  6. #6
    Registered User jrnj5k's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-13-2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    39
    Posts
    389
    Images
    11

    Default

    yep keens and teva both have toe covers

  7. #7

    Default

    Try Sealskinz socks. I used them for the Hundred Mile Wilderness with good results. They keep the feet cleaner than regular socks in mud, and keep sand from getting between toes, but are a bit clammy. I wore them under my trail runners in NY in temps as low as 10 degrees and feet stayed warm as long as I kept moving.
    As I live, declares the Lord God, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that the wicked turn back from his way and live. Ezekiel 33:11

  8. #8
    Garlic
    Join Date
    10-15-2008
    Location
    Golden CO
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,615
    Images
    2

    Default

    I see a lot of sandal hikers and respect it. I haven't tried it, but most who try it swear by it. Cracking is a big issue for some, and I hear an ounce or two of bag balm will last a thru hike.
    "Throw a loaf of bread and a pound of tea in an old sack and jump over the back fence." John Muir on expedition planning

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-27-2009
    Location
    Loudoun Co. Va
    Age
    69
    Posts
    458
    Images
    64

    Default

    I've not done any serious mileage in sandals, but do prefer them or trailrunners like a Montrail's Continental Divide.
    Look at Bite sandals for support and durability.

  10. #10
    Hiker bigcranky's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-22-2002
    Location
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Age
    62
    Posts
    7,937
    Images
    296

    Default

    The Keen toe box is way too tight for my feet. I've done some long days in Tevas, which worked ok. I liked the lightness on my feet, the flexibility, and the quick dry. Not sure I'd want to do multiday hikes, though, since my feet and legs were filthy at the end of the day. (I know, I could wash them.)
    Ken B
    'Big Cranky'
    Our Long Trail journal

  11. #11
    Pilgrim of Serendipity
    Join Date
    06-05-2006
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    45
    Posts
    849

    Default

    I do day hikes and overnights in Tevas. My pair has held up to almost-daily wear for going on four years now. (Yeah, I wear them to work too.)

    They are the most comfortable shoes I've ever owned. I love being able to wade across streams with them and have them almost dry within minutes. Air circulation on my feet is great. I don't think they've ever given me a blister.

    You do have to watch where you step and try not to kick things. I've ended up with little scratches on my legs when I'm not careful and/or on an overgrown trail. Your feet will get dirty. To me, it's worth it.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    12-06-2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Age
    49
    Posts
    56

    Default

    I'm a holdout. I love my heavy leather boots, but I have backpacked in sandals when the trail's not to rocky and/or there's multiple river crossings. If you want to do it, go for it... personal preference is the way to go when hiking. The one recommendation I would make is make sure your feet are well broken in. I had my Chaco's give my a nasty cut on the inside part of my foot which took a long, long time to heal.

  13. #13
    Registered User YoungMoose's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2008
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Age
    29
    Posts
    637
    Images
    51

    Default

    do it. i saw a thru hiker doing the same thing. he had a good pair that had a vibram bottom so it was just as sturdy as a boot.


  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Outwardboundbackpack View Post
    do it. i saw a thru hiker doing the same thing. he had a good pair that had a vibram bottom so it was just as sturdy as a boot.
    two of my thruhikes were wearing chaco sandels. i just sent (2 pair) in to chaco customer service to have them restrapped and have them resoled(with the older vibram soles) for my upcoming thruhike. the chacos they sell today are not performance minded sandels like a few years ago. the new soles are more college campus than trail worthy. the person in customer service even admitted it. the soles are harder to last longer! if you buy chacos IMO don't use the z2 models. by the way i hardly ever kicked anything with my toes usually my heals after i stepped over something. very comfortable never needed campshoes!

  15. #15

    Default

    got 1,100 AT mls out of a pair of keen sandals. Stitching, lamentation, and tread held up wonderfully.

  16. #16

    Default

    I just thought of one negative to hiking with sandals. Several times in the Hundred Mile Wilderness, I stepped on a stick which stuck up in the air and found its way between the straps of my other sandal - an annoyance once, very painful the second time. I got used to it after a few times.
    Last edited by Tinker; 02-09-2009 at 21:42. Reason: Added sentence
    As I live, declares the Lord God, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that the wicked turn back from his way and live. Ezekiel 33:11

  17. #17

    Default

    its easy

  18. #18

    Default No problems

    You won't have any more problems wearing sandals than you would have had with trail runners. The problems will just differ (dry and cracked feet, possible abrasions or blisters at contact points, etc).

    I plan on hiking a portion of the AT this year and I may do it in Tevas.

    I would never use Keen's (you know, the sandals that look like shoes with every other 1/2 inch cut out?). I tried Keen clip-bicycle-sandals on a cross-country ride last year--yeouch. The toe box killed my toes. They were like wearing iron. Keens, for me, seem to exhibit all negative aspects of a sandal, all negative aspects of a trail runner and all negative aspects of a rigid boot without delivering any of the positives.

    Keens are best worn while driving Yuppie-Grocery-Getters (Subaru's) and for zipping in and out for a latte-double-frappe-dash-of-hazenut-soy-skim-recycled-material-cup-of-coffee.

    That said, I've some hikers in Keens who love 'em and do very well in 'em.

  19. #19
    Super Moderator Marta's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-30-2005
    Location
    NW MT
    Posts
    5,468
    Images
    56

    Default

    I often wear sandals. The Morton's neuroma problem I'm having in one foot seems to do better when I'm wearing sandals.

    Ditto to the comment that your feet are more vulnerable to bruising/stabbing injuries. The worst one, though, was when I was wearing toe socks. Something snagged my little toe, jerked it to the side, and dislocated it. Not fun.

    I usually have to wear socks with the sandals, not for warmth, but to create a layer between sandal and skin that alleviates the friction.

    Sandals are great in hot weather, and on trails that have a lot of stream crossings.
    If not NOW, then WHEN?

    ME>GA 2006
    http://www.trailjournals.com/entry.cfm?trailname=3277

    Instagram hiking photos: five.leafed.clover

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-02-2007
    Location
    east killingly, ct
    Posts
    1,196
    Images
    270

    Default

    thruhiker roy uses sandals all the time. i hiked 100+ miles with him and he could move rather quickly in those things. he says that he has been using sandals for quite some time now. over ten years if i remember correctly..

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •