For information about PGC, its bear management plan, public opinion, harvest records and more, refer to PGC's Pennsylvania black bear page.
For information about PGC, its bear management plan, public opinion, harvest records and more, refer to PGC's Pennsylvania black bear page.
Last edited by emerald; 12-05-2010 at 17:52. Reason: Added links.
It may matter with respect to influencing bear behavior. Backyard bird feeding stations are often raided by bears. There are ways of designing bear-proof bird feeding stations to avoid habituating bears to particular locations or food sources. Refer to Living with Pennsylvania Black Bears for more information.
Bird feeding stations can influence bird behavior and winter mortality for better or worse depending upon how and when its done.
As you know, wildlife code, regulations, ordinances and policy reflect both the professional opinion of wildlife managers and public sentiment.
Last edited by emerald; 12-05-2010 at 18:13.
I've killed a few critters over the decades -- mostly to stock my freezer. But increasingly I'm reluctant to do so. I wonder why that is? Is it a sign of growing weakness, or growing wisdom?
Henry Thoreau confessed to a similar evolution. But to the end he urged young people to be hunters and fishermen, and adults to gain wisdom.
I have a bear bag set up for my bird feeder. Bears are a regular at my house in the spring. I also have an electric fence around my bee hive.
If you find yourself in a fair fight; your tactics suck.
I'll let others decide how best to describe anyone who would make that remark.
Henry was not a God. He said some things that were only pertinent to the times through which he lived. Other things that will influence humans through the end of time. In the century and a half since he died his readership and influence continues to grow world wide.
You make my principal point for me. You had set forth bird feeding as OK, as against bear feeding, chiefly, from what I read, because the former is legal and the latter is not. I question that - both have up sides and down sides, for the animals in question, irrespective of their legality.
I think the laws, here, are slanted in favor of reducing hazards to humans, with relatively little concern for the wild animals embodied in them. Chicadees and cardinals seldom threaten people's life and health, whether fed or not. Bears, when fed, often become a nuisance at a minimum, sometimes worse. This fact set, and concern for human welfare, are what drive an otherwise arbitrary legal distinction.
The mere fact that something is legal or illegal bevavior for people in a given jurisdiction has little relevace to whether such behavior benefits animals or vice versa. As such, I'd suggest that your frequent, first resort appeals to hunting or feeding animals as OK, or not, simply based on the law of a given place are weak arguments.
The more miles, the merrier!
NH4K: 21/48; N.E.4K: 25/67; NEHH: 28/100; Northeast 4K: 27/115; AT: 124/2191
While over-rated horse's ass is over the top and intemperately harsh, I can understand some frustration with him. Picked up a couple volumes of his work recently and found him hard to stomach at times. I bit drama queenish at times, though extraordinarily lucid and insightful at others. Worth the effort, as I see it, so long as discerningly applied.
The more miles, the merrier!
NH4K: 21/48; N.E.4K: 25/67; NEHH: 28/100; Northeast 4K: 27/115; AT: 124/2191
What would be the upside of feeding bears ice cream, doughnuts, bird seed and hummingbird nectar aside from the caloric benefit to individual bears, and, more importantly, how exactly would Pennsylvania's bear population benefit? Is it not better for bears as well as humans when bears are encouraged to rely upon natural food sources rather than dumpster diving? I am not disappointed by PGC's efforts to discourage feeding bears.
One of the objectives of Pennsylvania's bear management plan is to reduce hazards to humans, but to claim there is relatively little concern for the welfare of our bear population is mistaken. It would take some time to read everything PGC has posted about bears to its website, but you may find your concerns satisfied. At least you would discover more consideration has been given to managing bears than you appear to believe and PGC makes the case for its management plan far better than I could.
Last edited by emerald; 11-27-2010 at 18:20.
Henry was a dreamer who had issues with the daily mundane routine of life - the little things like holding down a steady job, paying his bills, paying taxes, etc. While I appreciate his writing, and agree with many of his philosophical observations, a world full of Henrys wouldn't produce much in the way of a society. He writes of "economy" but never goes beyond the level of his personal needs. I can't help but think he was bipolar / ADHD and probably fit a few other modern diagnostic criteria. He's a good read though to help put industrial society in perspective.
"That's the thing about possum innards - they's just as good the second day." - Jed Clampett
I discovered Henry about the age of 18 and have enjoyed his insights ever since. Though his thoughts on "economy" become less pertinent as one accumulates a spouse and kids. We hardly would all fit in the railway tool box Henry evisioned for himself, though from time to time all five of us used to squeeze into a not much larger backpacking tent.
I brought my bride into a ramshackled house in this town almost 50 years ago. No shower. No well. We carried water from relative homes in gallon jugs. It wasn't as cheap as Henry's 10 by 15 foot cabin on the shore of Walden, but almost. Her mother cried all night before the wedding over the thought of her daughter living under such conditions.
But over the years my inlaws came to love the place, spending three or four months with us every summer, camped in the loft over the garage, designed for building a strip canoe. It's now a more valuable house than we can really afford to pay taxes on, sitting as it does on the shore of the Kennebec estuary, three miles from the open ocean. But my wife won't give it up.
Nor would I, willingly. Walden remains by my bedside to be scanned for insights as I work on land trust matters and trails. Only 2,000 copies of Walden were sold during Henry's lifetime. Now millions of copies are in print. New editions come out regularly. Walden has been translated into almost every language. Henry obviously has qualities that Lone Wolf should seek to understand.
All this comes to mind in part because today is the last day of the regular deer season in Maine. Though I've become less of a hunter as the years wear on, I usually go out for a day or two in hopes a nice tender fawn will volunteer to fill the niches in my freezer left over from summer garden vegetables.
Today, however, I think I'll simply go for a walk in the woods and leave my 30-30 at home. I'll just ponder Lone Wolf's comment while strolling through a preserve that Thoreau inspired. Henry had argued that every town should have a thousand acres of public land to be left forever wild for its citizens to enjoy. It's taken almost 40 years, but Phippsburg Land Trust has preserved 810 acres. We are still counting.
Weary
Last edited by weary; 11-27-2010 at 11:31.
i'm more of a Ed Abbey kinda guy. Thoreau is a little too mamby pampy
But his legacy lives on:
http://www.waldenwoodsliving.com/
Frosty
Some time ago, weary suggested I shouldn't underestimate the power of the written word. While rereading Wilderness and the American Mind, I recalled his comment and now appreciate more fully how transcendentalists changed how we think about the natural world. Much of what followed politically to change our relationship with it would not have been possible without their earlier contributions.
Last edited by emerald; 11-27-2010 at 21:16.
Whether I choose to hunt or not, I believe I'll always prefer surplus game finding its way into home freezers and foodbanks to looking at it smeared all over our highways. Everyone who appreciates forests and uses wood products should be glad there are people who enjoy hunting whether they choose to hunt themselves or not.